Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.
 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.

Donít regulate Uber to death

Send a link to a friend  Share

[August 30, 2014] BY SCOTT REEDER | Special to
 SPRINGFIELD Ė Awhile back I took a cab to Chicagoís Navy Pier and attempted to pay for my ride with a credit card.

My effort was greeted with a torrent of obscenities..

The driver didnít want to take my card despite a placard of regulations in the cab that said he must do so.

When I pointed out the stack of credit card carbons on his dashboard, he hollered even louder.

It seems some drivers want the taxicab business to be strictly cash.

In the last year, or so, an alternative to cabs come on the scene. Itís called Uber.

Folks can use an app on their cellphone to get a ride. No cash changes hands. Itís all done online.

The drivers for Uber and its competitor, Lyft, have been screened by those companies and are driving their own cars. The pair get high marks for customer service.

But the competition had the owners of some big-time Chicago cab companies hopping mad.

The firms operate what economists call an oligopoly, thatís when a handful of big businesses control the market.

In June, the median price for a Chicago taxi medallion was $339,625. There arenít too many cab drivers who can fork over that kind of dough. So these big taxi outfits buy the medallions and rent them out to drivers for a portion of the day.

The medallions are issued by Chicago City Hall.

So, the bureaucrats like it because it keeps money pouring into city coffers. The cab companies like the system because they can continue to control the market. And the politicians like it because they get campaign contributions from the cab companies.

Thatís crony capitalism at its worst.

The group that isnít being looked after in this arrangement is the consumer.

Consumers suffer because they have to pay inflated prices.

[to top of second column]

And even though the industry is regulated, service can be Ė as my experience shows Ė pretty lousy.

But now there is a game changer in the mix ó Uber.

So what did the taxi company fat cats do when they found out they might have to really compete

They started hiring Springfield lobbyists left and right. And they tried to force onerous regulations on Uber and Lyft.

The measure passed with the help of a coalition of Chicago Democrats and downstate Republicans.

To his credit, Gov. Pat Quinn vetoed the measure this past week.

He cited the ďhome ruleĒ powers of cities such as Chicago as a reason.

ďThe principle of home rule is an important one,Ē Quinn said in a statement. ďI am vetoing this legislation because it would have mandated a one-size-fits-all approach to a service that is best regulated at the local level.Ē

But, governor, it is local government that created the cost prohibitive taxicab medallion system in the first place. It has helped keep the cost of cab rides high for consumers and prevented entrepreneurs lacking the money from going into the cab business.

This is service best regulated not at the state or local level.

The best regulators are the consumers themselves.

If they donít like the service, they wonít use it.

Scott Reeder is a veteran statehouse reporter and a journalist with Illinois News Network, a project of the Illinois Policy Institute. He can be reached at Readers can subscribe to his free political newsletter by going toILNEWS.ORG or follow his work on Twitter @scottreeder

[This article courtesy of Watchdog.]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article.

< Recent commentaries

Back to top