Welch said he appeared before the council as a concerned citizen
of Lincoln, asking them to delay the vote to hire the marketing
firm.
He said DCC Marketing was the firm hired by the Logan County Tourism
Bureau to put together its branding initiative. The firm had
provided research on Logan County and had prepared a marketing
playbook for the tourism bureau. As part of their work, DCC
Marketing had designed a new website for the Bureau.
Welch said the website was a problem that brought to question just
how well DCC Marketing was doing its job. He said the website was
missing information that should have been included. There are also
items to click on for more information that are empty. Therefore
when visitors to the website click on those items, error messages
are displayed saying nothing is available. He added that it was not
a secure website; it can be breached by hackers.
Welch said the website was developed by DCC Marketing. He said ‘I
should point out, that a high-quality tourism website was replaced
by this initiative. That website is Explore Logan County.com.” Welch
explained that Explore Logan County had been developed by a Logan
County citizen, David Doolin, who had a clear understanding and a
strong passion for promoting Logan County.
He said that he didn’t hold DCC Marketing completely responsible for
the lack of quality information on the new tourism website. He said
the Tourism Bureau was also responsible. But, he said it was DCC
Marketing’s responsibility to follow through and make sure the site
was functional.
He noted the website had been online more than 70 days, and problems
and voids still exist.
He then turned to the money involved and questioned how the figures
came to be. He noted that soon after being established, the Logan
County Alliance had come to the city with a proposal to help them
with their branding initiative. In that proposal, the LCA had asked
for $30,000, with plans for hiring DCC Marketing to do the work. The
city declined that offer.
Later, the city brought DCC Marketing in on its own, and the firm
quoted a fee of just over $17,000, for what appeared to be the same
services LCA had proposed. Welch said he didn’t know the details,
but would like to know. What happened with the $13,000? Did DCC
Marketing scale back on what work they would do for the city? Or,
was that extra $13,000 for the LCA to perform tasks on behalf of the
city?
He said if the $13K was for the LCA to perform tasks for the city,
it raised the question how much of the $60,000 paid by Lincoln to
the LCA for economic development was being used for legitimate
economic development activities.
Welch also mentioned that the LCA was required to deliver a report
to the city about its activities by April 1st. He said he didn’t
know if that happened.
He ended his comments saying, “I politely ask that you consider my
request to remove the vote for the branding initiative from this
evening’s agenda. Take some time to look into their quality and the
concerns which have been raised. I also encourage other members of
the community to reach out to their aldermen with their concerns,
whether that is by phone call, email or city council meeting. We
cannot expect our elected officials to make wise choices on our
behalf if they are not aware of our concerns.”
During the discussion, Jeff Hoinacki asked Welch if he is or has
been involved with the LCA. Welch explained that he was the former
president of the Main Street Lincoln organization that was disbanded
at the end of the year. He became a member of the LCA board but has
resigned that position. He said he was currently an active member of
the City of Lincoln Planning Commission.
Welch said there were a number of circumstances that prompted his
resignation from the LCA, but that he still believes in the mission
of the new organization. He added, “I want to be clear, I did not
point out and bring up the Logan County Alliance to point fingers at
them. I brought this up because, in this community, we spent
$200,000 on tourism initiatives. That is the number of tax dollars
that go to that organization. We expect that organization to spend
money wisely on our behalf.”
Welch said that yes, the money for the branding came from a State of
Illinois tourism grant. He said, “But I would say this, we all in
this room are residents of the state of Illinois, and it is our
responsibility to ensure those dollars are spent wisely regardless
of where they came from.”
Todd Mourning asked if Welch was on the Alliance board when the
tourism initiative came up. Welch said he was not. He explained that
the tourism bureau began this initiative before the LCA was formed.
Mourning then wondered what the agreement between the tourism bureau
and DCC Marketing was. Was DCC Marketing responsible for the
website? Welch said it was his understanding that the agreement was
a 50-50 with the bureau being responsible for half of the website
content and DCC Marketing the other half.
Mourning asked who the webmaster is for the site. Welch said it was
his belief that the tourism bureau should be the webmaster. He added
that the bureau had staff that could have been working on the site.
[to top of second column] |
City Administrator Clay Johnson asked again if Welch thought the
maintenance of the website was the responsibility of DCC Marketing.
Welch said they were responsible for half the content. He went on to
say that the Explore Logan County website was a much better
representation of Logan County. He said that Doolin was a valuable
asset that had been overlooked in the community. He expressed that
Doolin was a Logan County native. DCC Marketing was not local, and
possibly did not care about the things that Logan County residents
see as important.
Michelle Bauer said she thought that was an improper statement. She
said that the council couldn’t know what DCC Marketing does and does
not care about. Jonie Tibbs added that she wouldn’t say they don’t
care, but she might say they don’t know.
Tibbs went on to comment on the billboards along Interstate 55,
“These billboards along the highway, is a darn poor excuse for
advertising and a real slap in the face to us.” She concluded that
she would be in favor of looking at Doolin.
Johnson said he wouldn’t speculate on what tourism considered in
making their decisions. He said that as far as the agreement between
the city of Lincoln and DCC Marketing was concerned, there was no
website included. He wondered how Welch was relating the tourism
website to a concern for the city. Welch said he felt that the poor
quality of the website was a reflection of the work done by DCC
Marketing and that it showed a lack of commitment on the part of
that firm.
Tibbs shifted gears to the tourism bureau specifically wondering why
the city didn’t know about their activities. She said the city was
financing the tourism bureau, and the city should have known what
the bureau was doing.
Bauer said that the city did know to a certain degree. She said that
the tourism branding initiative was started last year, before the
merger under the LCA. She also reminded the council that Sarah
Wallick had appeared before the Council almost immediately after
starting her job with the Logan County Tourism Bureau. She added
that Wallick had inherited this marketing plan; she had not been
involved in its development.
Temporary Chairperson Marty Neitzel asked who then was the plan
developed under, what director. No one had an answer to that
question.
The talk moved on to the LCA. Steve Parrott asked about the report
that was due to the city council. Bauer said that quarterly reports
had been suggested, but she didn’t know it was a requirement. Welch
said that it was a requirement stated in the funding agreement that
the LCA would provide a report on April 1st.
Tibbs said that the report then needed to be brought before the
council of the whole, not just something written and filed or sent
to one person.
Hoinacki commented on the tourism website, saying that the city did
need to find out if it was DCC Marketing that dropped the ball or
the Alliance. Mourning agreed, saying the city needed to ask the
right questions about the site -- who owns it, who maintains it and
so on.
Scott Cooper said he would like to table the vote on DCC Marketing
until some of these questions are answered, and all seemed to agree.
Bauer did offer a comment on the LCA saying that the LCA has been
present at all the city council meetings except for the current one.
She noted that someone was on vacation, and everyone is entitled to
a vacation. However, Parrott contradicted that saying that vacation
or no, if the LCA had a responsibility to deliver a report on April
1, they should have done so.
When the item came up on the voting agenda later in the evening, the
motion to table was made by Tibbs and seconded by Kathy Horn. The
motion passed by unanimous vote.
[Nila Smith]
Post script: The Logan County Tourism
Bureau has hired a new Executive Director, Maggie McMurtrey. The
Bureau will hold its first meeting of 2015 on April 14th.
Past related
articles
Feb 28,
2014 -
Tougher Tourism Bureau seeks stronger identity
April 9, 2014 -
Tourism bureau to interview marketing firms
June 11, 2014 -
Logan County Tourism Bureau is working on
Rebranding
July 24, 2014 -
Tourism Update: A new board president, a new
interim director, a new board member, a new logo, a commitment to
UOC
October 7, 2014 -
Logan County Tourism Bureau anxious to get
market and branding plan in place
December 12, 2014 -
Unified organization to be called Logan County
Alliance
January 15, 2015 -
City to vote on financial support for Logan
County Alliance
|