| 
			 Welch said he appeared before the council as a concerned citizen 
			of Lincoln, asking them to delay the vote to hire the marketing 
			firm. 
 He said DCC Marketing was the firm hired by the Logan County Tourism 
			Bureau to put together its branding initiative. The firm had 
			provided research on Logan County and had prepared a marketing 
			playbook for the tourism bureau. As part of their work, DCC 
			Marketing had designed a new website for the Bureau.
 
 Welch said the website was a problem that brought to question just 
			how well DCC Marketing was doing its job. He said the website was 
			missing information that should have been included. There are also 
			items to click on for more information that are empty. Therefore 
			when visitors to the website click on those items, error messages 
			are displayed saying nothing is available. He added that it was not 
			a secure website; it can be breached by hackers.
 
 Welch said the website was developed by DCC Marketing. He said ‘I 
			should point out, that a high-quality tourism website was replaced 
			by this initiative. That website is Explore Logan County.com.” Welch 
			explained that Explore Logan County had been developed by a Logan 
			County citizen, David Doolin, who had a clear understanding and a 
			strong passion for promoting Logan County.
 
 
			 
			He said that he didn’t hold DCC Marketing completely responsible for 
			the lack of quality information on the new tourism website. He said 
			the Tourism Bureau was also responsible. But, he said it was DCC 
			Marketing’s responsibility to follow through and make sure the site 
			was functional.
 
 He noted the website had been online more than 70 days, and problems 
			and voids still exist.
 
 He then turned to the money involved and questioned how the figures 
			came to be. He noted that soon after being established, the Logan 
			County Alliance had come to the city with a proposal to help them 
			with their branding initiative. In that proposal, the LCA had asked 
			for $30,000, with plans for hiring DCC Marketing to do the work. The 
			city declined that offer.
 
 Later, the city brought DCC Marketing in on its own, and the firm 
			quoted a fee of just over $17,000, for what appeared to be the same 
			services LCA had proposed. Welch said he didn’t know the details, 
			but would like to know. What happened with the $13,000? Did DCC 
			Marketing scale back on what work they would do for the city? Or, 
			was that extra $13,000 for the LCA to perform tasks on behalf of the 
			city?
 
 He said if the $13K was for the LCA to perform tasks for the city,
 it raised the question how much of the $60,000 paid by Lincoln to 
			the LCA for economic development was being used for legitimate 
			economic development activities.
 
 Welch also mentioned that the LCA was required to deliver a report 
			to the city about its activities by April 1st. He said he didn’t 
			know if that happened.
 
 He ended his comments saying, “I politely ask that you consider my 
			request to remove the vote for the branding initiative from this 
			evening’s agenda. Take some time to look into their quality and the 
			concerns which have been raised. I also encourage other members of 
			the community to reach out to their aldermen with their concerns, 
			whether that is by phone call, email or city council meeting. We 
			cannot expect our elected officials to make wise choices on our 
			behalf if they are not aware of our concerns.”
 
			
			 
 During the discussion, Jeff Hoinacki asked Welch if he is or has 
			been involved with the LCA. Welch explained that he was the former 
			president of the Main Street Lincoln organization that was disbanded 
			at the end of the year. He became a member of the LCA board but has 
			resigned that position. He said he was currently an active member of 
			the City of Lincoln Planning Commission.
 
 Welch said there were a number of circumstances that prompted his 
			resignation from the LCA, but that he still believes in the mission 
			of the new organization. He added, “I want to be clear, I did not 
			point out and bring up the Logan County Alliance to point fingers at 
			them. I brought this up because, in this community, we spent 
			$200,000 on tourism initiatives. That is the number of tax dollars 
			that go to that organization. We expect that organization to spend 
			money wisely on our behalf.”
 
 Welch said that yes, the money for the branding came from a State of 
			Illinois tourism grant. He said, “But I would say this, we all in 
			this room are residents of the state of Illinois, and it is our 
			responsibility to ensure those dollars are spent wisely regardless 
			of where they came from.”
 
 Todd Mourning asked if Welch was on the Alliance board when the 
			tourism initiative came up. Welch said he was not. He explained that 
			the tourism bureau began this initiative before the LCA was formed. 
			Mourning then wondered what the agreement between the tourism bureau 
			and DCC Marketing was. Was DCC Marketing responsible for the 
			website? Welch said it was his understanding that the agreement was 
			a 50-50 with the bureau being responsible for half of the website 
			content and DCC Marketing the other half.
 
 Mourning asked who the webmaster is for the site. Welch said it was 
			his belief that the tourism bureau should be the webmaster. He added 
			that the bureau had staff that could have been working on the site.
 
			
			[to top of second column] | 
 
				 
			City Administrator Clay Johnson asked again if Welch thought the 
			maintenance of the website was the responsibility of DCC Marketing. 
			Welch said they were responsible for half the content. He went on to 
			say that the Explore Logan County website was a much better 
			representation of Logan County. He said that Doolin was a valuable 
			asset that had been overlooked in the community. He expressed that 
			Doolin was a Logan County native. DCC Marketing was not local, and 
			possibly did not care about the things that Logan County residents 
			see as important. 
			Michelle Bauer said she thought that was an improper statement. She 
			said that the council couldn’t know what DCC Marketing does and does 
			not care about. Jonie Tibbs added that she wouldn’t say they don’t 
			care, but she might say they don’t know.
 Tibbs went on to comment on the billboards along Interstate 55, 
			“These billboards along the highway, is a darn poor excuse for 
			advertising and a real slap in the face to us.” She concluded that 
			she would be in favor of looking at Doolin.
 
 Johnson said he wouldn’t speculate on what tourism considered in 
			making their decisions. He said that as far as the agreement between 
			the city of Lincoln and DCC Marketing was concerned, there was no 
			website included. He wondered how Welch was relating the tourism 
			website to a concern for the city. Welch said he felt that the poor 
			quality of the website was a reflection of the work done by DCC 
			Marketing and that it showed a lack of commitment on the part of 
			that firm.
 
 Tibbs shifted gears to the tourism bureau specifically wondering why 
			the city didn’t know about their activities. She said the city was 
			financing the tourism bureau, and the city should have known what 
			the bureau was doing.
 
 Bauer said that the city did know to a certain degree. She said that 
			the tourism branding initiative was started last year, before the 
			merger under the LCA. She also reminded the council that Sarah 
			Wallick had appeared before the Council almost immediately after 
			starting her job with the Logan County Tourism Bureau. She added 
			that Wallick had inherited this marketing plan; she had not been 
			involved in its development.
 
			
			 
			
 Temporary Chairperson Marty Neitzel asked who then was the plan 
			developed under, what director. No one had an answer to that 
			question.
 
 The talk moved on to the LCA. Steve Parrott asked about the report 
			that was due to the city council. Bauer said that quarterly reports 
			had been suggested, but she didn’t know it was a requirement. Welch 
			said that it was a requirement stated in the funding agreement that 
			the LCA would provide a report on April 1st.
 
 Tibbs said that the report then needed to be brought before the 
			council of the whole, not just something written and filed or sent 
			to one person.
 
 Hoinacki commented on the tourism website, saying that the city did 
			need to find out if it was DCC Marketing that dropped the ball or 
			the Alliance. Mourning agreed, saying the city needed to ask the 
			right questions about the site -- who owns it, who maintains it and 
			so on.
 
 Scott Cooper said he would like to table the vote on DCC Marketing 
			until some of these questions are answered, and all seemed to agree.
 
 Bauer did offer a comment on the LCA saying that the LCA has been 
			present at all the city council meetings except for the current one. 
			She noted that someone was on vacation, and everyone is entitled to 
			a vacation. However, Parrott contradicted that saying that vacation 
			or no, if the LCA had a responsibility to deliver a report on April 
			1, they should have done so.
 
 When the item came up on the voting agenda later in the evening, the 
			motion to table was made by Tibbs and seconded by Kathy Horn. The 
			motion passed by unanimous vote.
 
 [Nila Smith]
 
 Post script: The Logan County Tourism 
			Bureau has hired a new Executive Director, Maggie McMurtrey. The 
			Bureau will hold its first meeting of 2015 on April 14th.
 
			Past related 
			articles
 Feb 28, 
			2014 - 
			
			Tougher Tourism Bureau seeks stronger identity
 
 April 9, 2014 - 
			
			Tourism bureau to interview marketing firms
 
 June 11, 2014 - 
			
			Logan County Tourism Bureau is working on 
			Rebranding
 
 July 24, 2014 - 
			
			Tourism Update: A new board president, a new 
			interim director, a new board member, a new logo, a commitment to 
			UOC
 
 October 7, 2014 - 
			
			Logan County Tourism Bureau anxious to get 
			market and branding plan in place
 
 December 12, 2014 - 
			
			Unified organization to be called Logan County 
			Alliance
 
 January 15, 2015 - 
			
			City to vote on financial support for Logan 
			County Alliance
 
			 |