Logan County and Lincoln discuss electric aggregation for 2016

Send a link to a friend  Share

[December 01, 2015]  LINCOLN - When the city of Lincoln Aldermen and Logan County Board members met on Monday, November 23rd, they discussed several topics of mutual interest.

Among those was the subject of Electric Aggregation.

In 2012-13, the city of Lincoln, all of the other municipal units in the county, and the county board opted to implement an electric aggregation program for Logan County residents. With guidance from Farnworth Group, Mark Pruitt of Illinois Community Choice Aggregation Network was selected to represent the county and cities in finding a competitive electric rate for residents. The provider selected was Integrys and the rate secured was $0.3965/kWh for two years. In 2014, Pruitt was contracted once again to seek out the best electric rate. This time, he came back to the governing bodies and suggested that they roll back to Ameren as their electric provider because that company had the best rates. That advice was taken, and the aggregation program was temporarily suspended.

Last week, Lincoln City Administrator Clay Johnson spoke on this topic. He explained that the city has it on good authority that Ameren rates will be increasing this year, so he believes it would be good to look into doing an electric aggregation program for the city and county this year.

Johnson said, however, that he would recommend that there be a six-month contract starting in January and expiring in June, and then a possible new contract starting in June of 2016 and lasting for one to two years.

Mourning asked how much constituents had saved in the last aggregation program. County Board member Andy Anderson said as he recalled it was about $120 per year per household. He also noted that there were differences in the rates charged by Ameren at certain households. Because of this switching to Integrys was not the best option for some Logan County residents.

With the “opt out” option, Logan County constituents had the option of switching providers or staying with Ameren, according to which program was the least expensive.

Anderson asked Johnson why he was recommending only a six-month contract to start. Johnson said there is state legislation that is probably going to pass that will have an effect on how electric aggregation works. A short term contract will not lock Logan County residents into a plan that doesn’t work well. He also noted that May and June of each year are “critical” times for electric rate pricing. Ending the short term program in June will allow Pruitt the opportunity to search out the best price and make a sound recommendation for the next one to two years, based on those rates established in June.

Lincoln Alderwoman Michelle Bauer asked about using ICCAN again. She wondered if there were other consultants that were being offered the chance to bid on representing the cities and county. Johnson said yes, that others had been contacted. ICCAN, he said, had offered their services at the same rate as in their last contract. The quote from ICCAN, he said would be the least costly.

[to top of second column]

Logan County Board Member, Chuck Ruben, spoke in support of ICCAN and Pruitt. He reminded the group that in 2014, it was Pruitt who recommended that the aggregation program be suspended because it would not save money for Logan County residents. He said he thought it spoke well of Pruitt that he would make a recommendation that did not benefit him and his company.

Johnson also reminded the group that while Pruitt may make the recommendation, the various municipalities, and the county act as a consortium that has the authority to say ‘no’ to the recommendation. In addition, with an “opt-out” program, every household in the county can also say no, if they don’t believe the aggregation will be to their benefit.

Logan County Board member Gene Rohlfs brought up a question about involving Farnsworth Group in this process. He wondered if that was necessary. Bill Thomas of the Logan County Economic Development Partnership said that “yes,” having Farnsworth involved was to the advantage of everyone involved. Rueben noted that the role of the Farnsworth Group was to act as a general contractor in the process, doing the work for the county and other governing agencies.

In the first round of aggregation, Farnsworth Group acted as the mediator, taking the aggregation program to the various communities, and holding special meetings for constituents to help educate them on the aggregation process.
 


One advantage of electric aggregation is that it creates a larger buying group by incorporating all the municipalities in the county, plus the unincorporated areas of the county, into one consortium. When seeking competitive bids on electricity, there is no “group discount,” but at the same time, electric providers are attracted to a larger customer base and will make a greater effort to bid competitively to gain those customers.

It was also noted by Logan County Board Chairman David Hepler that the governing bodies have the option to collect a small administrative fee in the electric aggregation program. In the first round, the county did not collect a fee, but Hepler said this time, that option would be considered by the board. The county would be able to collect that fee only from residents and businesses in the county that are currently Ameren customers, but not inside any incorporated portion of the county.

[Nila Smith]

Back to top