Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.

 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


http://www.lincolndailynews.com/images/frontpage/killebrew2.jpgRadical choices

By Jim Killebrew

Send a link to a friend  Share

[January 08, 2015]  Once again the world is watching the aftermath of a radical Islamic terrorist attack apparently carried out in the building of a satirical newspaper in Paris, France where the terrorists entered the building, called out the names of those they wanted to kill, then proceeded to shoot them. The result of that terror attack was 12 people killed by an ideology that hides itself in a religion that calls for the death of anyone who will not believe what the terrorists believe.

As those radicalized Islamic terrorists began their killing spree, a video captured part of the incident where at least one of the terrorists shouted, "Allahu Akbar" before shooting unarmed, innocent workers in a place of business. The end result of that attack was twelve people dead and at least fifteen injured. During the incident at least two of the terrorists were filmed running back to their get-away vehicle. On the way to the escape point the camera also recorded a terrorist committing a cold-blooded murder by shooting a wounded officer lying on the sidewalk; one of the terrorists walked up and shot the officer dead while he begged for mercy.

We shake our head at such wanton violence. We wonder what the motivation for such behavior encourages people to become radicalized to such an extent that it "gives them permission" to seek out those with whom they disagree and actually take their lives. Main-stream Islam practitioners refuse to accept the radicalized Islamic terrorist as being a true Muslim. At the same time, however, there seems to be no organized repulsion from the legitimate group that denounces the radical terrorist acts of those who are speaking in the name of Islam.

The Islamic State identifies their motivation. In essence, they have stated they believe that anyone who does not accept their religion can be marked with a jihad, either national or personal. From what they have said in their broadcasts during times they have beheaded innocent people is they will not tolerate any counter beliefs, especially those of the Christian or Jewish beliefs. They are sworn to eradicate all who do not denounce their oppositional beliefs, and are doing so by initiating individual jihad against the so-called "infidels." For their reward, they expect to receive seventy-two virgins to participate in a life of pleasure once they pass over the bridge of this life to the next. In many ways they seem to be winning the cultural and religious war, especially when it is coupled with the effects of political correctness that has increased the killings of Christians across the world by the "cultural marginalization of Christians."

Compare that perception of their "heaven" with the Scriptures that recorded the words of Jesus.

Matthew, one of Jesus' Disciples, recorded something that Jesus said about judgment:

[to top of second column]

“When the Son of Man comes in his glory and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. All the nations will be assembled before him, and he will separate people one from another like a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. Then the king will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or naked and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?’ And the king will answer them, ‘I tell you the truth, just as you did it for one of the least of these brothers or sisters of mine, you did it for me.’" (Matthew 25:31-40)

By contrast from the radical Islamic terrorist position, as Christians when we act in love toward the "least" of our brothers or sisters who belong to Jesus, our obscurity is thrown out the window, because we, in fact, are doing that kindness to Jesus.
If you are a Christian, I would like to think at least two things happen when you arrive in heaven: The first is that you might be met with many who will simply say “Thank you.” The man who learned of Jesus when he was 12 because you took the time to teach his Sunday School class. The woman who didn’t have quite enough money to pay her heating bill and you finished out the payment. The lad who got into your car by hitchhiking and went the last 100 miles home after having lived in “a far country” and woke up one morning having “come to his right mind.”

Those acts, little acts, done in Jesus’ name helped each of those to walk “the streets of gold” forever. Yes, Jesus got the glory, but on that day, in heaven, Jesus will turn to you and say, “but you get the thanks.” He will thank you for yielding to Him and allowing Him to work through you to touch the lives of so many.

It is not likely that Jesus will consider the murder, rape, violence, terrorist acts, beheadings, kidnapping, and the waging of war as has been seen by ISIS or ISIL will be seen as kindly acts for "the least of these." The terror attack in Paris was met with a couple of statements from our government: A "Terrible act of violence" from the White House Press Secretary; and, a "Cowardly evil attack" from the President. The world is in the process of making a decision of what behavior should be acceptable; the position of radicalized Islamic terrorism, or the emulation of the acts of Jesus. Which one of those ideological positions and actions should be called "radicalized terrorism"?

[By JIM KILLEBREW]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article.

 

< Recent commentaries

Back to top