Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.
 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


Nanny of the week: Towns ban sledding

Send a link to a friend  Share

[January 19, 2015]  By Eric Boehm  

It’s one of the great joys of childhood — zooming down a snowy hillside in a plastic toboggan, determined to go farther and faster than all your friends.

Do you dare to go head-first? Can you find just the right path on the steepest part of the hill to hit record-breaking speed, while deftly avoiding any trees, rocks or fences that might make the trip both riskier and, of course, more fun?

Shutterstock image
Shutterstock image
WINTER FUN BANNED: Towns are banning sledding and tobogganing because of fears about lawsuits. There’s plenty of blame to go around for this one.
In an increasing number of towns, there is now an additional obstacle added to this kind of traditional winter fun: government nannies.

From Iowa to New Jersey, from Nebraska to Oklahoma, more towns are passing rules than ban sledding, tobogganing, tubing and other kinds of winter-sliding-down-the-hillside fun.

As Free Range Kids reported earlier this month, the problem is that people do sometimes get hurt while sledding. And sometimes, those people — or their parents — filelawsuits and try to get taxpayers to pay outlandish settlements over those mishaps.



It’s a great example of how the nanny state doesn’t just happen spontaneously, at least not all the time. In many cases, nanny laws are the consequences, intended or no, – of a worldview that says government can either keep us safe from all threats or be held responsible for every minor thing that goes wrong.

“While the no-sledding towns sound like killjoys. perhaps the issue is really us, unable to hold these two ideas in our brain at once: Sledding is fun and, once in a long while, deadly. Sled at your own risk,” writes Lenore Skenazy, editor of Free Range Kids.

[to top of second column]

 

So if we’re going to assign blame for why the next generation of children will never know the simple joys of spending a snowy school day whizzing down the neighborhood hill, let’s start with the parents and their lawyers.

Falling off a sled should not be considered grounds for a lawsuit, any more so than falling off a bike or scrapping your knee while playing baseball should be. These things happen when children play.

But do they happen often enough to justify outright bans?

According to one study that surveyed emergency rooms at American hospitals, there are about 20,000 sledding injuries each year. As you might expect, kids are the most likely victims, and broken bones the most common ailment.

That pales in comparison to the national figures of more than 200,000 kids injured each year in bike accidents and more than 80,000 each year injured in skateboarding crashes 80,000 each year — activities that are still legal just about everywhere.

And the bans don’t even protect taxpayers from being on the hook for huge settlements.

The city of Hamilton, Ontario, in Canada, had to pay more than $900,000 in a settlement to a man who was seriously injured while sledding last year, despite the fact that the town had already banned the activity.

[This article courtesy of Watchdog.]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article

< Recent commentaries

Back to top