Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.
 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


Traffic cams just revenue scams? One legislator says stop red light cameras

Send a link to a friend  Share

[January 23, 2015]  By Mark Fitton

SPRINGFIELD — A suburban legislator says its time to tow red light cameras to the junkyard.

Rep. David McSweeney, R-Barrington Hills, has filed legislation to repeal the state law that allows automated red light cameras at intersections.

McSweeney says the red light cameras don’t improve safety, are simply a way for municipalities to raise money and promote big government at the expense of already overburdened taxpayers.

“Taxes are too high, and a lot of the municipalities — including Chicago — are just trying to hit people with fees,” he said. “I think they (the cameras) are unnecessary and all they lead to is big government because all they’re doing is collecting additional revenue.”

McSweeney pointed out a Chicago Tribune series that documented alleged bribes, unexplained spikes in ticketing and a $7.7 million windfall for the city from 77,000 questionable tickets.

The lawmaker says the evidence that red light cameras increase traffic safety is questionable and, for the most part, they generate a tax by a different name.

“Red light cameras primarily serve as a revenue enhancement tool at great cost to taxpayers,” McSweeney said.

State Sen. Tim Bivins, R-Dixon, who served 20 years as a sheriff, said he has problems with automated red light traffic cameras.

[to top of second column]

“I’m not a fan of them,” he said. The process for fighting an automated ticket is different than a traditional ticket and somewhat deprives the driver of his or her day in court, he said.

Still, Bivins said, he’d need to take a look McSweeney’s bill, because there are times when matters are better left in local government hands than in the state’s.

Proponents of automated enforcement systems, such as the Governors Highway Safety Association, say the systems are intended to supplement and not replace traditional enforcement.

They also argue the greatest benefit from automated system is deterrence.

The association, however, says cameras should not be used as a revenue generator.

It warns against paying for systems based on the amount of revenue generated and says any revenue derived should only go to highway safety.

[This article courtesy of Watchdog.]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article

 

< Recent commentaries

Back to top