|
 The second report found a cell-phone-based system that alerts
trained volunteers when someone nearby needs CPR can significantly
increase the chances of a victim getting immediate help.
Many people are trained in CPR and "if we can send these volunteers
to the right place at the right time, we may finally improve rates
of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and realize the
public health potential of bystander-initiated CPR," Drs. Comilla
Sasson and David Magid of the University of Colorado School of
Medicine said in a Journal editorial.
Cardiac arrest strikes about 420,000 people outside a hospital in
the U.S. each year. Another 275,000 such cases occur in Europe.
The first Swedish study found that while 4 percent of the 14,869
people who didn't get CPR survived for 30 days after their cardiac
arrest, the rate rose to 10.5 percent for the 15,512 who did.
Because of some earlier research, "there was starting to be a little
controversy about efficacy of bystander CPR in the real world,"
Sasson, who was not involved in the new studies, told Reuters
Health. "This study showed that at 30 days, there is a survival
benefit."
"We have clearly shown that CPR is a life-saving procedure" and the
results should "encourage people to intervene if they are in that
real-life situation," study coauthor Dr. Jacob Hollenberg, head of
research at the Center for Resuscitation Science at Karolinska
Institute in Stockholm told Reuters Health.
Not surprisingly, when the researchers looked at the time between a
patient's collapse and the start of CPR, the 30-day survival rate
was highest when CPR was begun within three minutes of collapse.
The highest 30-day survival rate - 21.6 percent - was among people
who collapsed away from home with CPR initiated within three
minutes. The rate was just over 19 percent among patients under age
73 who were treated within three minutes; it was 11 percent for
older patients who received prompt attention.
The team also found that emergency calls tended to be initiated
faster when bystander CPR was done, which may be an indication that
trained bystanders recognize cardiac arrest faster, they said.
"The message we are trying to send out is, take a CPR course and
act" if someone collapses, said Dr. Leif Svensson, another coauthor.
"If you don't have the knowledge, act anyway. You cannot harm anyone
by doing just chest compression."
"In my mind, this adds to the body of evidence that says CPR really
matters," Sasson said. "We as a community need to start thinking
about what are we really going to do to get to the next level so it
isn't just a 50-50 shot of whether I get CPR if I have cardiac
arrest. It really needs to be 100 percent."
[to top of second column] |
The second study, involving four of the same researchers, was
designed to help in that effort. It looked at the effectiveness of
having a system that used mobile phones to alert people trained in
CPR that someone within a third of a mile (500 meters) had
collapsed.
When the system was used, 62 percent of 305 patients got CPR before
EMS workers arrived. When the system wasn't activated, the rate of
bystander-initiated CPR was 48 percent for 360 patients.
The system, which ultimately had 9,828 volunteers, did not produce a
significant increase in 30-day survival. However, the study didn't
have enough cases to definitively resolve the question of whether
such a system could prevent deaths, said Svensson, who is also with
the resuscitation center.
Hollenberg said the system now has 14,000 volunteers and it is being
enhanced with better GPS technology and the ability to tell a person
where to find the nearest defibrillator, a device designed to shock
the heart into beating properly.
In their editorial, Sasson and Magid said several barriers would
need to be overcome to implement a similar system in the U.S.
"Most 911 dispatch centers in the United States cannot automatically
identify call locations from cell phones and cannot send or receive
text messages," they said. Also, "lay volunteers may be reluctant to
allow dispatchers to have constant access to their location or fear
being sued if they do not respond to a call. Clarification of local
Good Samaritan laws would address these concerns."
"We believe that many people will welcome the opportunity to
respond," they said. "If we can send these volunteers to the right
place at the right time, we may finally improve rates of survival
after out-of-hospital cardiac and realize the public health
potential of bystander-initiated CPR."
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1JADiFO and http://bit.ly/1GiQ3ng New England
Journal of Medicine, online June 10, 2015.
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
