|
 The Defend Trade Secrets Act passed 87-0, amid strong White House
backing.
Supporters hope the unanimous vote will boost the bill's prospects
in the House of Representatives.
"Some thieves would rather not go through the trouble of developing
products themselves; they'd rather just steal the fruits of others'
creativity," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said in urging
passage of a bill he argued would "help protect American
innovation."
Theft of intellectual property, including trade secrets, costs U.S.
businesses more than $300 billion a year, according to a 2013 report
by the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property,
which was made up of a bipartisan group of high-ranking former U.S.
officials.
 For that reason, the bill has received support from a wide array of
companies, including Boeing Co <BA.N> and Johnson & Johnson <JNJ.N>,
and trade groups such as the Biotechnology Industry Organization,
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and a software lobby whose members
include Apple Inc <AAPL.O> and Microsoft Corp <MSFT.O>.
Trade secrets are confidential information that can give a business
a commercial edge. They can vary widely depending on the industry,
including manufacturing processes, formulas, computer algorithms,
industrial designs, business strategies, and customer lists.
Companies have become increasingly concerned about protecting
themselves against threats, including hacking and rogue employees.
The legislation would give companies the right to sue in federal
court to recover damages, enforce injunctions and prevent the
further dissemination of stolen trade secrets.
[to top of second column] |
It would also create a uniform standard for what constitutes trade
secret theft. Currently, if companies want to sue, they are
relegated to state courts, where there is a patchwork of state laws.
Trade secret theft is already a federal crime, but according to the
bill's sponsors, the U.S. Department of Justice lacks the resources
to prosecute such crimes.
Some critics, including a group of legal scholars, has warned that
broad legislation on trade secrets could lead to more frivolous
litigation in federal courts.
The House version of the bill has more than 120 sponsors, but the
House Judiciary Committee has not yet considered it and it was not
clear whether it would act in coming months.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York and Richard Cowan in
Washington; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Matthew Lewis)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
