'Febrile' might be a better descriptor.
Tension is now growing between central banks and governments, urging
calm, and global investors nursing heavy losses from one of the
worst starts to the year on record.
Unnerved by the oil collapse and its fallout, China's yuan 'trilemma'
and growing fears of world recession, for many money managers this
will be at best a long haul with no easy fixes.
"Central banks, although remaining vigilant on financial stability,
are progressively losing effectiveness, and may fail to effectively
curb market volatility in the medium term as they did after the
Great Financial Crisis," said Giordano Lombardo, Group Chief
Investment Officer at Pioneer Investments.
So do policymakers go up a gear or stand back a little and hope warm
words and small monetary tweaks limit the shakeout?
So far, they are sticking to the script. Measures mooted over the
past two weeks are all consistent with G20 finance chiefs, meeting
in Shanghai on Feb. 26 and 27, reading straight from last year's
Sticking to standing G20 communiques, central banks have so far been
true to the pledge "to monitor financial market volatility and take
The Bank of Japan went furthest by adopting negative interest rates
last week for the first time. The European Central Bank continues to
stoke expectations of another cut in its already negative deposit
rate as soon as next month.
Both the U.S. Federal Reserve and the Bank of England have cited the
fresh market ructions as major policy considerations and, in doing
so, pushed back market expectations for planned interest rate rises
there into late 2016, or even 2017 in the case of the United
Again, this is straight from G20 texts: "In an environment of
diverging monetary policy settings and rising financial market
volatility, policy settings should be carefully calibrated and
clearly communicated to minimise negative spillovers."
China, the G20 chair for 2016, has insisted it can and will hold the
yuan steady. Premier Li Keqiang phoned International Monetary Fund
chief Christine Lagarde last week to pledge Beijing would keep the
yuan "basically stable" and improve communication with financial
For that, read G20 texts saying: "We reaffirm our previous exchange
rate commitments and will resist protectionism."
What's more, alarmed by the relentless oil rout, major energy
exporters, including G20 members Saudi Arabia and Russia, have at
least started talking about draining the crude glut even if they're
still far from agreeing on how and when.
Prior communiques have been clear here too in stating that
relentless oil price falls are not an unambiguous positive and can
be deeply destabilizing. "There are important challenges including
volatility in exchange rates and prolonged low inflation, sustained
internal and external imbalances, high public debt, and geopolitical
So far, so good. But is that enough?
The big concern for many investors and governments is that even
though projections for aggregate global economic performance still
look reasonable, a loss of financial market confidence in itself can
catalyze a crunch.
[to top of second column]
So some reckon a more forceful 'Grand Bargain' is needed.
Strategists at Bank of America Merrill Lynch reckon something akin
to a 1985-style Plaza Accord may require a large one-off devaluation
of China's yuan to lance speculation fuelling capital flight. They
also talked of quid pro quo measures such as fiscal boosts from
Germany, France and the UK.
But "our deep concern is that the macro and the markets may first
need to worsen to inspire the correct policy response," they added.
Reality for many in the marketplace is that the attrition is not
just about sentiment or even monetary settings, it's now about real
distressed selling from sovereign funds and emerging market central
banks, as well as blue-chip corporate hits or asset writedowns and
fears for junk credit or dividends.
The full extent of the hit to leveraged U.S. shale companies has yet
to be felt. Oil majors such as BP are only starting to register the
scale of their losses as their credit quality deteriorates and
dividends across all firms in the natural resource sector come under
With trillions of dollars now changing hands as a direct result of
what looks like a sustained 70 percent drop in oil prices over 18
months, there are many shoes yet to drop.
Using publicly available models from oil exporters' reserve managers
and sovereign funds, and assuming only liquid assets were sold, JPM
Morgan estimates they dumped about $90 billion of government bonds,
$50 billion of public equities, $7 billion of corporate bonds and
$15 billion of cash instruments in 2015.
Even if oil prices stay about $35 per barrel this year, it reckons
on at least another $220 billion depletion of FX reserve and
sovereign wealth fund assets this year. Western European equities
and financials are most exposed, it said.
Selling from reserve managers and sovereign funds in China, where
hard currency reserves are estimated to have dropped about $700
billion from the peak in 2014, is another pressure point.
As for more illiquid assets, such as high yield bonds or property
and private equity, "to the extent that this liquidity risk triggers
solvency risk, we need to be very nervous in certain areas," wrote
Axa Investment Managers' Mark Tinker.
(Additional reporting by Patrick Graham; Editing by Ruth Pitchford)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.