County considers actions on
recreational vehicles, junk yards and other zoning matters
Send a link to a friend
[February 05, 2016]
LINCOLN
- On Wednesday, February 3, 2016, the Planning and Zoning Committee
met to discuss setting ordinances for recreational vehicles and
junkyards in subdivisions, consider two-acre rural residential
zoning, and suggest some additional amendments to the Conditional
Use Ordinance.
|
Committee member Kevin Bateman said there is a property in the
county with several recreational vehicles, or campers, sitting on
it. At the Committee’s January meeting, Zoning Officer Will D’Andrea
said the property owners have building permits, but have not
finished building. Bateman then asked if there were regulations
about how long one can stay in the recreational vehicle.
D’Andrea said are no regulations of the time length, and Bateman
said there is a need to craft an ordinance saying that people cannot
live in campers. Bateman said potential buyers who looked at a house
for sale near the property did not want to live next to a place with
campers on it.
Bateman said he likes Laurie Muck’s suggestion that they follow
Whiteside County’s ordinance, which prohibits using recreational
vehicles for “permanent housing outside of a legal campground.” It
only allows recreational vehicles to be used as temporary housing
for up to 180 days if someone’s residence was destroyed.
D’Andrea asked if the committee wanted a definition section on
recreational vehicles near a dwelling, regulations for specific
uses, what zones they could be allowed in, and whether to prohibit
use of campers outside a campground. He said they need to figure out
specific language and definitions.
Bateman said he would like to add the use of recreational vehicles
to dwelling standards. He said allowing people to use them as
temporary housing when their home is destroyed seems acceptable.
Board Chairman David Hepler said D’Andrea could craft language to be
brought to the committee next month.
Bateman motioned D’Andrea adopt language to add to Logan County’s
dwelling standards to eliminate people from using campers or
trailers as a permanent residence, and all approved. D’Andrea will
have new language ready at the next meeting.
The committee also discussed junkyards in subdivisions which had
been brought up at January’s meeting. Hepler said there is a
property on Nicholson road that has several code violations and has
had seven site visits and received multiple certified letters. This
case and six others have been turned over to the State’s Attorney’s
office, but Hepler said the cases had not been resolved as of
January.
Committee Chairman Pat O’Neill said maybe they should have a retired
lawyer, judge, or University of Illinois law student come and help
with such cases. Muck said some counties have civil attorneys that
handle these types of cases. He said the board may need to consider
hiring someone to handle these problems even if it is on a part-time
basis.
Bateman said they need to draft a letter to the State’s Attorney,
that the entire board would like to see movement on this issue.
Committee members Emily Davenport and Gene Rohlfs had questions
about the fines and cases being postponed.
Both Bateman and Hepler said there is a need for more enforcement
since the code violations can affect many people.
Bateman said the State’s Attorney should draft a letter listing all
the charges and fines, and giving a deadline for taking care of
them. If the person does not meet the deadlines, a court appearance
would be required.
Hepler said he would like the Health Department to share the status
of the seven cases with the County Board. Bateman motioned that the
board ask for copies of the information by next month. Two-acre
residential zoning
Two-acre residential zoning was then discussed. Bateman said he and
committee member Dave Blankenship had been talking about the zoning,
and would like two-acre plots to be used for residential purposes if
60 percent is deemed non-tillable. He said there are several pieces
of hilly and non-tillable land that could be sold. Right now, lots
sold are at least five acres. Blankenship said they do not want to
take away good farmland.
Rohlfs said he thought two-acre lots used be sold, and D’Andrea said
there was a Country Home Ordinance allowing a minimum of one acre of
land to be sold, but that ordinance changed.
[to top of second column] |
Guest Todd Steinberg said his family is interested in buying a two-acre plot
near his home, though it is tillable, and most farmers would not give up a lot
of land.
Doug Muck said the Plat Act addresses how much land can be split off, so the
committee should look at the Act.
D’Andrea said he gets “chewed out” by those who just want two acres, but the
other side is that Logan County is largely agricultural. He said more people
moving to the country can cause conflicts.
Bateman said he lives next to a farm and has to be careful where he stands when
the neighbor is combining or he may get hit in the head by corncobs. People
moving from a big city may not be aware of these hazards.
Guest Aaron Steinberg said when people are spending so much money to live in the
country, they will know what they are getting into, but realizes others may not.
Rohlfs and O’Neill both said perhaps there needs to be a “buyer beware”
disclosure, but Muck said buyer beware is almost dead in real estate
transactions. Muck said a civil law principle of “moving to a nuisance,” or next
to a cement plant, race track, farm, hog operation, or limestone quarry means
people cannot complain in court because they were aware of what was there when
they moved in.
Bateman’s motion to change the ordinance from five to two acres was passed and
will be further discussed. The issue will need to go before the Zoning Board of
Appeals at some point.
The committee also had some suggestions for language to be added to the
Conditional Use Amendment currently on display at the courthouse. The changes
will be considered after it is taken off display later in the month.
Committee member David Hepler motioned that the Board insert language about
toxic and volatile chemicals into the Conditional Use Ordinance since there are
potential dangers where chemicals are stored. The board will look into possible
fencing and barriers and do more research into state rules as they consider new
standards. Police already watch the tanks with anhydrous chemicals closely.
Chemical owned by farmers and stored on their residence would be excluded.
O’Neill motioned to bring this language forward.
Committee member Dave Blankenship said he wants to add language about
“sequential” activity into the Sunset Clause so that it is more business
friendly and encourages dialogue with the Zoning Officer during the process.
Hepler said the term may also be less obscure and less adversarial, allowing
people to advance with their business. Hepler said the term sequential could
also show a business is moving step-by-step, and large projects such as wind
farms would have more time to "maximize quality." Rohlfs and Muck felt the term
was less subjective than the term "substantial" that they had discussed
previously.
D’Andrea said they should consider tying the term “sequential” to extensions
rather than the first five years set in the Sunset Clause.
Hepler motioned to bring this language forward to the board.
Discussions of these issues will continue in upcoming months.
The next Planning and Zoning meeting will be Wednesday, March 2, 2016.
[Angela Reiners]
|