|
 The league approved the St. Louis Rams’ move to L.A. but only gave
conditional approval for the Chargers to join them. But that won't
happen unless the teams can cut a stadium-sharing deal.
The unique dynamic sets up a fresh round of brinkmanship involving
the Rams, the Chargers and San Diego that could drag on another
year.
Will the Chargers get a better deal from Rams owner Stan Kroenke, or
from public officials in San Diego? And does Kroenke want to share
his dramatic new stadium - and the coveted Los Angeles market?
“It’s certainly not over,” said Roger Noll, a Stanford University
economist who studies the business of sports.
The decision follows years of contentious talks between three cities
and their teams: the Rams, the Chargers, and the Oakland Raiders.
All three applied to be the first Los Angeles NFL team since 1995.
The Rams and Chargers - if they can come to terms - would both play
at a stadium that could cost as much as $2 billion in Inglewood, a
suburb southwest of Los Angeles.
Should the Rams-Chargers talks fail, the Raiders could then try to
work out their own deal with Kroenke and the Rams.
Mark Fabiani, special counsel to the Chargers, said the team and its
chief executive, Dean Spanos, were “working with the NFL and the
Rams on a potential deal framework.”
The League gave the Chargers and Rams until January 2017 to make a
deal.
STICKY NEGOTIATIONS
In the NFL, only MetLife stadium in New Jersey pairs two teams - the
New York Giants and the New York Jets. The teams worked together to
privately finance the stadium.
By contrast, the Rams and Chargers, until now, have been rivals with
competing L.A. stadium plans. The Chargers had proposed to share a
stadium with the Oakland Raiders in Carson, another suburb.
That and other factors complicate the negotiations ahead.
For the Rams, the obvious advantage to sharing the stadium is
splitting the costs - in this case, the cost of the most expensive
stadium in league history. The Chargers, for their part, would get
to play in a better venue in a bigger market.
But the talks could get sticky from there. Kroenke’s plans include
much more than a stadium.
His development company, the Kroenke Group, will have a major stake
in the ambitious real estate project and entertainment complex
surrounding the proposed stadium. The company is partnering with
Stockbridge Capital Group, which was developing the site before
Kroenke planned to move his team there.
The glass-roofed, 80,000-seat stadium would be surrounded by a
6,000-seat performance venue, 890,000 square feet of retail space,
780,000 square feet of office space, 2,500 residences, a 300-room
hotel and 25 acres of parks and open spaces, according to
Stockbridge.
Kroenke will invest more than $800 million in the Inglewood project,
according to documents filed by the Rams to the NFL earlier this
month.
The Kroenke Group and Stockbridge declined to comment. The Rams did
not respond to requests for comment.
A key question is how such sprawling plans will play into the talks
between the Chargers and the Rams.
“If you’re the Chargers, you don’t want to pay a full half of the
money to build the stadium without getting half of the benefits from
the development deal,” said Victor Matheson, an economics professor
who studies sports business at College of the Holy Cross in
Massachusetts.
The Inglewood stadium project will be privately financed, making it
a steep buy-in for the Chargers.
Kroenke chose to spend his own money in L.A. instead of accepting a
proposed $400 million public contribution for a new St. Louis
stadium. But the Chargers face a tougher calculation.
[to top of second column] |
“The Chargers don’t have as much money, and they’re not
participating in this grander development,” said Noll. “So their
willingness to pay for the stadium cost in Inglewood is much less
than the Rams.”
According to Forbes, Chargers owner Alex Spanos and family have a
net worth of $1.69 billion - compared to $7.4 billion for Kroenke.
ASSET APPRECIATION
A move to Los Angeles could nearly double the value of the Chargers,
from about $1.5 billion in San Diego to more than $3 billion over
time, said Marc Ganis, president of Sportscorp Ltd., a Chicago-based
sports business consulting form.
“There’s a high location premium for Los Angeles,” Ganis said.
And high upfront costs: The team would also have to pay the league a
$550 million relocation fee.
“I can’t imagine that Dean Spanos would pay half of a $2 billion
stadium,” plus the league fee, said Andrew Zimbalist, a Smith
College sports economist.
Even if Spanos wanted to split the costs, it’s questionable whether
Kroenke would want to split the stadium, its revenues and the L.A.
market – where the NFL hasn’t tested fan enthusiasm in two decades.
The league may have to apply pressure or offer incentives to get the
Rams owner on board, said Neil deMause, editor of Field of Schemes,
a website that tracks stadium subsidies.
"Kroenke has pretty much no motivation to allow a second team into
Inglewood,” deMause said.
Asked whether the league had any preference for two teams over one,
NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said: “That is up to the 32 owners.
We’ve said all along that any stadium development should be prepared
to accommodate two teams."
ENDLESS TALKS
The other pivotal question is whether the league’s conditional
approval gives the Chargers new leverage to wring more public money
out of San Diego - where stadium talks have already dragged on for
14 years.
The current offer on the table calls for the city and the county to
contribute $350 million toward a new $1.1 billion stadium. San Diego
voters would need to approve that subsidy in an election yet to be
scheduled.
San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer spoke of a fresh start during a
Wednesday news conference.
“Now we’re waiting to hear from the Chargers,” said San Diego County
Board of Supervisors Chairman Ron Roberts.
The city’s plan for a new, 67,500-seat stadium calls for the
Chargers to pay $363 million, a fraction of their potential share of
Kroenke’s planned L.A. stadium. The NFL would contribute $200
million, and the team would raise another $187 million from the sale
of personal seat licenses.
Of course, the Chargers could also stay in their current home,
Qualcomm Stadium, Matheson said.
“It’s not as if their stadium is obsolete,” he said. “It just isn’t
as fancy as some of these others – and they have a case of stadium
envy.”
(Reporting by Robin Respaut and Mark Lamport-Stokes; editing by
Brian Thevenot)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
