| Pekin Street Parking Lot project 
			“on hold”  Send a link to a friend
 
			
            
            [July 20, 2016] 
            
            
			LINCOLN 
			- On Monday evening, the Lincoln city council entertained two 
			motions regarding the Pekin Street Parking Lot project. This project 
			was voted down in the May 16, 2016, voting session of the council. 
			At that time, all eight aldermen were present for the vote. Those 
			voting “no” were Tracy Welch, Steve Parrott, Kathy Horn, Jonie Tibbs 
			and Rick Hoefle. Those who voted “yes” were Michelle Bauer, Jeff 
			Hoinacki and Todd Mourning. | 
		
            | 
			
			 With no alternate plan in place it appeared that the parking lot 
			was a dead issue. However, a few weeks later it was announced that 
			the city wanted to revisit the parking lot plan. To do so the vote 
			of May 16th would need to be rescinded and a new motion placed on 
			the agenda. Consequently, new action items were added to the voting 
			agenda this week. 
 The first action item posted under ‘New Business/Communications’ 
			read, “Motion to rescind vote to reject bid from Illinois Civil 
			Contractors, Inc. (ICCI) for Pekin Street Parking Lot project.” The 
			second action was listed under ‘Bids’ on the agenda and read, 
			“Approval of bid from Illinois Civil Contractors, Inc for the Pekin 
			Street Parking Lot Project in an amount not to exceed $480,644.70.”
 
 After calling the meeting to order for the evening, Mayor Marty 
			Neitzel asked if there was anyone who wished to address the council 
			during public participation. Leslie Hoefle came forward to talk 
			about the Pekin Street project.
 
 She opened by saying that she had heard that Neitzel had told local 
			business owners impacted by the project that she would ask the 
			council to table the approval of the bid, pending further 
			discussion. Hoefle applauded that decision.
 
			
			 Hoefle commented on the current design saying that considering the 
			semi traffic that needs access to the businesses from that alley, it 
			was dangerous to children and all pedestrians. She commented that 
			her husband, Rick Hoefle, who is a city alderman, had 33 years of 
			insurance experience working specifically with the trucking industry 
			as a litigation specialist, serving as an expert witness. She urged 
			the council to take his advice on the liability and safety concerns 
			regarding this parking lot.
 She said that after the last vote there was an impression left that 
			the downtown business owners didn’t want anything at all done to the 
			parking lot; and that was not the case. She said the business owners 
			do want a better parking lot, and they want the city to address the 
			sewer issues, as well as the storm water run-off issues.
 
 She talked about the unsightly wires in the parking lot and alderman 
			Steve Parrot’s suggestion at a previous meeting that those issues 
			should be addressed. She said she agreed with his assessment.
 
 She suggested that to beautify the backs of those buildings, which 
			can be seen from Pekin Street, perhaps there could be murals painted 
			on the buildings. She added that it could be a community painting 
			project, and noted other communities that have done similar 
			projects.
 
			
			[to top of second column] | 
 
Hoefle commented, “The city needs a strategy to determine when a plan or person 
goes from being a community asset to a community liability.” She said that it 
appeared that the revitalization plan was slanted to benefit certain people and 
that she had put together documentary evidence that she would be sharing with 
the press and aldermen to support her claim. 
When Hoefle completed her presentation, there were no comments or questions from 
aldermen. 
 After voting on the consent agenda, Neitzel did address the council asking them 
to first rescind the previous vote, but then to also table the new vote to 
approve the bid from ICCI, pending further discussion.
 
 Michelle Bauer, combining the two action items into one, made a motion to 
rescind and table the Pekin Street Parking Lot project. The motion was seconded 
by Kathy Horn. With all eight aldermen present for the evening, the motion 
carried by a unanimous vote.
 
				 
			[Nila Smith] 
			NOTE:  The document 
			offered by Leslie Hoefle to the Lincoln City Council on Monday, July 
			18, 2016 began by questioning who and why the Library/Community 
			Parking Lot issue was brought back before the city council. It then 
			launched into reviewing the whole Downtown Revitalization Project 
			planning process. The emphasis was on the persons who were involved. 
			It speculates on individual motives and integrity. 
 In keeping with our editorial policy to not attack individuals, but 
			speak to the issue(s), Lincoln Daily News will not display the pdf.
 
			Past related articles |