Pekin Street Parking Lot project
“on hold”
Send a link to a friend
[July 20, 2016]
LINCOLN
- On Monday evening, the Lincoln city council entertained two
motions regarding the Pekin Street Parking Lot project. This project
was voted down in the May 16, 2016, voting session of the council.
At that time, all eight aldermen were present for the vote. Those
voting “no” were Tracy Welch, Steve Parrott, Kathy Horn, Jonie Tibbs
and Rick Hoefle. Those who voted “yes” were Michelle Bauer, Jeff
Hoinacki and Todd Mourning.
|
With no alternate plan in place it appeared that the parking lot
was a dead issue. However, a few weeks later it was announced that
the city wanted to revisit the parking lot plan. To do so the vote
of May 16th would need to be rescinded and a new motion placed on
the agenda. Consequently, new action items were added to the voting
agenda this week.
The first action item posted under ‘New Business/Communications’
read, “Motion to rescind vote to reject bid from Illinois Civil
Contractors, Inc. (ICCI) for Pekin Street Parking Lot project.” The
second action was listed under ‘Bids’ on the agenda and read,
“Approval of bid from Illinois Civil Contractors, Inc for the Pekin
Street Parking Lot Project in an amount not to exceed $480,644.70.”
After calling the meeting to order for the evening, Mayor Marty
Neitzel asked if there was anyone who wished to address the council
during public participation. Leslie Hoefle came forward to talk
about the Pekin Street project.
She opened by saying that she had heard that Neitzel had told local
business owners impacted by the project that she would ask the
council to table the approval of the bid, pending further
discussion. Hoefle applauded that decision.
Hoefle commented on the current design saying that considering the
semi traffic that needs access to the businesses from that alley, it
was dangerous to children and all pedestrians. She commented that
her husband, Rick Hoefle, who is a city alderman, had 33 years of
insurance experience working specifically with the trucking industry
as a litigation specialist, serving as an expert witness. She urged
the council to take his advice on the liability and safety concerns
regarding this parking lot.
She said that after the last vote there was an impression left that
the downtown business owners didn’t want anything at all done to the
parking lot; and that was not the case. She said the business owners
do want a better parking lot, and they want the city to address the
sewer issues, as well as the storm water run-off issues.
She talked about the unsightly wires in the parking lot and alderman
Steve Parrot’s suggestion at a previous meeting that those issues
should be addressed. She said she agreed with his assessment.
She suggested that to beautify the backs of those buildings, which
can be seen from Pekin Street, perhaps there could be murals painted
on the buildings. She added that it could be a community painting
project, and noted other communities that have done similar
projects.
[to top of second column] |
Hoefle commented, “The city needs a strategy to determine when a plan or person
goes from being a community asset to a community liability.” She said that it
appeared that the revitalization plan was slanted to benefit certain people and
that she had put together documentary evidence that she would be sharing with
the press and aldermen to support her claim.
When Hoefle completed her presentation, there were no comments or questions from
aldermen.
After voting on the consent agenda, Neitzel did address the council asking them
to first rescind the previous vote, but then to also table the new vote to
approve the bid from ICCI, pending further discussion.
Michelle Bauer, combining the two action items into one, made a motion to
rescind and table the Pekin Street Parking Lot project. The motion was seconded
by Kathy Horn. With all eight aldermen present for the evening, the motion
carried by a unanimous vote.
[Nila Smith]
NOTE: The document
offered by Leslie Hoefle to the Lincoln City Council on Monday, July
18, 2016 began by questioning who and why the Library/Community
Parking Lot issue was brought back before the city council. It then
launched into reviewing the whole Downtown Revitalization Project
planning process. The emphasis was on the persons who were involved.
It speculates on individual motives and integrity.
In keeping with our editorial policy to not attack individuals, but
speak to the issue(s), Lincoln Daily News will not display the pdf.
Past related articles
|