| 
			 Early in the evening, during the public participation portion of 
			the meeting, Hoffman, and Toby Prang, who signs his artwork “Moses 
			Pinkerton” addressed the council. 
 Jason Hoffman spoke first saying that he had heard questions about 
			the title of the sculpture, and he wanted to explain it. The 
			sculpture is named “Maintain Equilibrium.” Hoffman said that he 
			first designed the sculpture while a student at Eastern Illinois 
			University in 2000-2001. Hoffman said at that time, he was going 
			through some personal issues and felt his life was out of balance. 
			He said there were many days that he felt like “taking the easy way 
			out.” But he didn’t. He said that he was hopeful that the sculpture 
			would encourage others to maintain their equilibrium even in times 
			when they feel like giving up.
 
 Prang aka Pinkerton also spoke. He began by asking the aldermen to 
			define art, then said, “no matter what your answer, you had to use 
			your imagination to reply.”
 
 He said he is “a firm believer that art leads the way, and people 
			with disposable income will follow.” Prang said, “the piece is going 
			to cast ever-changing shadows as the sun moves accrues the sky. 
			Giving whoever sees it the opportunity to use their imagination.”
 
			
			 Later in the evening when the item came up for a vote, Rick Hoefle 
			asked if the council could talk before the motion was made. He was 
			advised that according to the rules of order, the motion had to come 
			first. Michelle Bauer made the motion to approve, which was seconded 
			by Jeff Hoinacki.
 Hoefle then began the dialogue regarding the sculpture. He said that 
			he was not opposed to the artwork at all. But, he also realized that 
			it was being placed in the historic downtown district, and he 
			wondered if it could be placed somewhere else. He noted that Hoffman 
			and Pinkerton had two pieces of art on Sangamon Street. He wondered 
			if this work could also go there, perhaps on the Sangamon side of 
			the Lincoln Depot.
 
 Jonie Tibbs asked if the proposal for the sculpture had been taken 
			to the Downtown Historic Preservation Committee for their review and 
			approval or rejection. City Building and Safety Officer John Lebegue 
			said that it had not gone before that committee.
 
 City Administrator Clay Johnson said he wanted to mention that 
			Sangamon Street is also within the Downtown Historic District.
 
 Tracy Welch said he did want the HCP to review the proposal; he 
			thought that was the fitting procedure. He said he was also 
			wondering if the art project, if approved, could be funded through 
			the city’s new Civic Foundation. That foundation has not been 
			finalized as of yet. Johnson and Mayor Marty Neitzel were recently 
			authorized to move forward with the formation of the Foundation, but 
			work on that is not yet completed.
 Kathy Horn said that she had 
			talked to constituents from all over the city, not just her ward, 
			who said that with city streets being in the shape they are in, the 
			taxpayers don’t think the city should be financing art. 
			
			[to top of second column] | 
 
Todd Mourning asked how the site for the sculpture was selected. Johnson said 
that quite some time ago when Keith Snyder was mayor and the design work was 
begin put together for the Library Parking Lot; the artists approached the city 
about a new piece of art. Because the project was under design, it was 
considered that it could be placed at that corner.
 At the last meeting about the sculpture, Steve Parrott, who was absent this 
week, asked if there could be a comparison done with a local metal provider on 
the price. Hoffman and Pinkerton had provided an estimate of the cost of 
materials from a firm in Kentucky that had quoted the best price.
 
 This week, Welch asked if artists had requested a quote locally from Lincoln 
Iron and Metal. Hoffman said he had, but had not yet heard back from that 
company.
 
 Michelle Bauer said that she was a supporter of art, but was hearing the 
concerns about the appropriateness of the proposed modern art in the historic 
district. She asked Hoffman if he would be willing to discuss with the city a 
different design, to go into that corner. Hoffman said that he certainly would.
 
 Mourning came back to the Foundation idea and said that the Foundation would be 
a vehicle for donations from the public specifically to the sculpture. He said 
he liked the idea of private funding as opposed to using taxpayer dollars. He 
said he liked the piece as designed, and would also be willing to consider a 
different piece, as well as make a personal donation to the Foundation for the 
construction.
 
 Mourning added that art at that corner would make the parking lot more than just 
a parking lot, that it would be an attraction or draw to bring people downtown.
 
 Mayor Marty Neitzel said she too thinks that there should be a piece of art on 
that corner, and noted that it would be a nice tie-in to the Art in the Park 
Festival.
 
 
 At the end of the conversations, Bauer asked if she could amend her motion. 
Johnson said that she could, if Jeff Hoinacki, who offered the second agreed. 
Hoinacki did so, and Bauer offered the amendment. She asked to table the motion 
while the city and artists discuss other options for the artwork to be placed at 
the corner of Pekin and Kickapoo Streets. When the roll call was taken seven 
aldermen voted “yes.” The eighth alderman, Steve Parrott was absent for the 
evening.
 
 [Nila Smith]
 |