| 
		 
		 
		Madigan muzzles 
		Illinoisans on term limits 
		Written By: Austin Berg, INN Contributor 
		 May 5, 2016 
		  
		 When Mike Madigan first took his seat in 
		the Illinois House of Representatives, the wide-eyed youth of the world 
		were proclaiming the virtues of Coca-Cola. 
			 | 
        
        
            
					
 “I’d like to teach the world to sing, in perfect harmony,” they sang on an 
Italian hilltop. 
 
Peace. Unity. Democracy. It was 1971. 
 
More than four decades into Madigan’s tenure, Illinois couldn’t be much further 
from those ideals. 
 
In fact, Madigan has muffled one of the few common choruses among Illinoisans of 
all political stripes – support for term limits. For yet another year, 
Illinoisans will be deprived of a referendum on the ballot to vote on this 
matter. 
 
Nearly 4 out of 5 Illinois residents support term limits, according to polling 
from the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University 
Carbondale. It’s no wonder Madigan doesn’t want to give voters the choice to 
restrict political staying power. 
 
Strong demand for term limits in Illinois should come as no surprise. 
 
Only 25 percent of Illinoisans are confident in their state government, 
according to poll numbers released Feb. 17 by Gallup. This stands as the lowest 
rate in the nation by an eight-point margin, and is far lower than that of any 
other Midwestern state.
  
The best case for term limits in Illinois might be the fight surrounding, well, 
term limits. Only the strongest of political machines could so effectively deny 
Illinoisans their voice on an issue with such widespread support. 
 
In a 2014 fight to put legislative redistricting to a popular vote, that same 
political machine provided a prime example of why Illinoisans feel a need to end 
the status quo in the first place. 
 
A citizens group wanted a vote on its plan to take redistricting out of the 
politicians’ hands and make the process nonpartisan. The group collected nearly 
double the 300,000 signatures required by law to get the measure on the November 
2014 ballot. But a lawsuit filed by a longtime associate of Madigan prevented 
voters from being heard on the matter. 
 
Instead, the ballot saw three nonbinding survey questions, one of which Madigan 
later admitted was placed purely to boost Democratic turnout for then-Gov. Pat 
Quinn. 
 
It’s no wonder so many Illinoisans see state politics as a power trip and not a 
public service. 
 
[to top of second column]  | 
            
             
              Opponents of term limits often argue they restrict the voice of 
			voters. If constituents put a politician in office for decades, 
			doesn’t that mean he or she is doing a good job? 
			Perhaps, but tenures stretching across generations have led to 
			un-democratic outcomes for voters across the state. Madigan has 
			consolidated his power through decades of fundraising, redistricting 
			and scare tactics to the point where nothing can become Illinois law 
			without his approval. 
			 
			How’s that for democracy? 
			 
			With more than 80 years of combined experience between Madigan and 
			Senate President John Cullerton, entrenched political figures run 
			the show in Illinois. The same is true in cities across the state – 
			especially the Windy City. Of the top 10 biggest cities in the U.S., 
			Chicago is the only one without term limits for its mayor or City 
			Council members. 
			 
			Chicago Alderman Ed Burke, often dubbed “the real mayor of Chicago,” 
			took office in 1969. 
			 
			As things stand, Illinois taxpayers are on the hook for politicians 
			who use the system to earn a paycheck at all costs. The average 
			lawmaker salary in the General Assembly is more than $80,000, 
			according to the Commission on Government Forecasting and 
			Accountability. And that’s for what is legally considered a 
			part-time job. 
			 
			And don’t forget about politicians’ pensions. A career state 
			lawmaker who retires at age 66 can expect to receive $2.1 million in 
			lifetime pension benefits, according to Illinois Policy Institute 
			research. With that kind of money on the line, it’s unsurprising 
			that Statehouse stalwarts are fighting to maintain the current 
			system. 
			
			
			  
			Term limits aren’t just a cosmetic change. They aren’t a feel-good 
			Coke commercial. They’re a powerful reform that can make Illinois 
			democracy work again. 
			 
			Austin Berg is a writer for the Illinois Policy Institute. He wrote 
			this column for the Illinois News Network, a project of the 
			Institute. Austin can be reached at aberg@illinoispolicy.org. 
  
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article 
			 |