| 
			
			 LaHood began his day at home in Peoria, then went to Bloomington 
			for a meeting. He stopped for lunch at the Palms Grill in Atlanta 
			where he enjoyed time with an intimate group of constituents. He 
			then moved on to Mount Pulaski to visit with students before moving 
			on to Springfield where he participated in a pre-election debate 
			with his Democrat opponent, Junius Rodriguez. 
 In Atlanta, several of the local community leaders came to have 
			lunch with LaHood and have casual conversations about concerns they 
			have for federal, state, and local issues.
 
			
			 
 Among those on hand were Atlanta Mayor Fred Finchum, Lincoln 
			Alderman Rick Hoefle, Logan County Board Chairman David Hepler, 
			county board members David Blankenship and Gene Rohlfs, Lincoln 
			Mayoral candidate Wanda Lee Rohlfs, Bill Thomas of the Logan County 
			Economic Development Partnership, Bill Kelly of the Illinois Scenic 
			Byways, Illinois State Representative Tim Butler.
 
			
			 
			LaHood started the conversation talking about his career and how he 
			had served as a prosecutor in Illinois, then Las Vegas, Nevada. He 
			and his wife had reached a point where they were concerned about 
			where they were, as opposed to where they wanted to raise their 
			children and decided that was not in Las Vegas. The couple returned 
			to Illinois for that reason.
 LaHood said he’s been in office just over a year, but throughout 
			that time spent in Washington D.C., he has come “home” every 
			weekend, and at the same time, has never missed a vote in the House 
			of Representatives. He laughingly proclaimed that he is no longer 
			the very lowest man on the totem pole, as since his arrival another 
			new congressman has come on the scene, giving LaHood the rank of 
			434th member instead of 435th.
 
 LaHood said he takes the position that the United States needs to 
			return to a “pro-growth economy,” doing more to make it possible for 
			business and industry to exist in this country rather than on 
			foreign soil. He said that he is a great proponent for agriculture 
			and respects that his district is the eighth largest agricultural 
			based district in the United States. His goal is to work toward 
			promoting agriculture, creating more trade opportunities and less 
			regulation for ag producers.
 
 He said that with agriculture being a large portion of our nation’s 
			trade, it is disturbing to realize that fewer and fewer 
			representatives in Washington D.C. represent agricultural districts.
 
 LaHood went on to speak about the work with his Illinois 
			Agricultural Advisory Committee and added that on the whole, we need 
			to figure out what it will take to incentivize young people to stay 
			on the farm.
 
 Moving on, he said he wanted to complement the community leaders in 
			Atlanta. He noted that many small communities in rural areas are 
			dying out, but Atlanta is thriving through good, strong leadership.
 
 While they ate, LaHood invited his guests to address any topics or 
			questions they had for the representative.
 
			
			 
			Wanda Lee Rohlfs was the first to speak, inquiring about 
			transparency in government and communication between federal, state, 
			and local agencies. LaHood said that frankly, he didn’t think there 
			was a whole lot of coordination between the governing entities. He 
			said the key was to elect officials who are communicative, and open 
			and transparent. He said that he tried to set an example for others 
			as a communicator with his constituents.
 Rohlfs then asked about the theory of “pro-growth,” wondering where 
			it was to begin, was that a federal-level task that would work its 
			way down to local communities, or must it start on the lower levels 
			and work its way up.
 
 LaHood said that he did not believe the Republicans, in general, 
			have not done enough to get behind pro-growth. He said the last time 
			the United States had seen pro-growth was during the Bill Clinton 
			administration. He added that part of what is hindering growth in 
			America is over-regulation, and he believes the federal government 
			needs to back off.
 
 He went on to say that another hindrance to pro-growth was Obama 
			Care. He said the federal health initiative was hurting business in 
			general, and that there is a serious need to look at the program, 
			repeal and restructure the health program.
 
 David Hepler asked a compound question regarding terrorism, and the 
			military and the true size of the problems. LaHood said there were 
			issues with the “Lone Wolf” terrorism that is the work of ISIS. He 
			said that the federal administration had not done enough to stop 
			ISIS from infiltrating into our country. LaHood also noted that the 
			United States erred in pulling troops out of Iraq. He said when the 
			U.S. pulled out the Iraqi army fell apart and ISIS stepped in and 
			took over.
 
			
			[to top of second column] | 
 
LaHood also noted that changes are needed in the immigration policies that would 
further prevent these terrorist groups to send infiltrators into the United 
States. 
			 
At the same time, he noted that the country has to be fiscally aware of the cost 
of the military actions and that it cannot go into debt.
 Bill Kelly commented that it appeared that there was a need for compromise in 
the Congress. He said that there was an attempt to take on the attitude, “I may 
not like you, but we do have to work together.” He wondered if
 Congress was working toward being more unified.
 
 LaHood said that he felt that Congress was somewhat of a dysfunctional unit 
because of the divisions. He noted that having John Boehner out of the picture 
was good, but there needed to be more change. He also mentioned a bill to revamp 
congressional rules and set up a better Congress. He noted there is a proposal 
for a “Congress of Tomorrow.” He noted that there is a segment on the LaHood 
website about the Congress of Tomorrow.
 
 
 Bill Thomas and Bill Kelly noted the value of Route 66 in Illinois and shared 
with LaHood work that is already underway in Illinois for the celebration of the 
100th anniversary of the Route 66 Mother Road. Kelly noted that Route 66 brings 
people from all over the world through the state.
 
 Thomas shared that since the city of Atlanta began exploiting its Route 66 
heritage in 2009, sales tax collections in Atlanta during peak tourist season 
has risen 43 percent. Thomas said he wanted to see the federal government 
declare Route 66 as a national trail.
 
 
With Representative Butler on hand, Thomas also noted that Butler is working on 
the state level for a Route 66 program in preparation for the 100th anniversary.
 Rick Hoefle noted that the city of Lincoln is also working toward drawing 
attention to Route 66 in the city. He noted that the city has been working with 
Geoff Ladd and Kelly’s organization to increase signage in the heart of the city 
that will bring tourists into town and the downtown businesses.
 
 Kelly also noted that the Scenic Byways recently started selling motorcycle 
license plates to support Route 66 projects. The state already offers a vehicle 
plate for Route 66, but Scenic Byways must take orders for a minimum of 2,000 
motorcycle plates before the state offers them to the public through its 
specialty plate program.
 
 The final question of the day came from Hepler who inquired of Representative 
Butler about the stop-gap budget and what was going to happen in the state at 
the end of the year. Butler said there is work in progress, and he is hopeful 
that discussions will continue into the first of the year, with a budget 
forthcoming.
 
 As the questions wound down, LaHood noted that he was on a schedule that 
included a trip to Mount Pulaski where he would address some students at one of 
the schools. He thanked everyone for joining him for lunch.
 
 He closed responding to a question from Wanda Lee Rohlfs about what the people 
can do to move the country in the right direction. LaHood said he believed that 
everything starts at a local level. He said community leaders could stress the 
importance of voting, and electing good leaders, first on a local level, then on 
up to the federal level, saying that all good things that happen in this country 
start on a local level.
 
 [Nila Smith]
 
 |