| 
			
			 Hoagland has been on the job since the day after he was hired. 
			The bureau office assistant Marlea Elias was also introduced. Elias 
			will serve as the recording secretary at the monthly meetings of the 
			board. 
 Board members present this week were Kevin Bateman, Emily Davenport, 
			Kathy Horn, Ron Keller, Steve Parrott, Gail Sasse and Shawn Taylor.
 
 During the course of the evening, the board met and heard from three 
			prospective new board members, Marilyn Wheat, Kenna Shaffer and 
			Cindy Fleshman.
 
 Fleshman has been serving as the Interim Director of the Bureau. She 
			has remained on the payroll to assist in the transition of Hoagland 
			into the director position. Earlier in the evening, she said that 
			she was now finished with her employment, but is hopeful that she 
			will be able to serve the Bureau as a board member.
 
 Shaffer is the manager of the Best Western and Econo Lodge in 
			Lincoln, both owned by former tourism board member Paresh Patel. 
			Shaffer’s family moved to the Middletown area when she was a 
			youngster. They later moved to Lincoln. After she married, she and 
			her husband lived for a time in Bloomington, but eventually moved 
			back to Lincoln where they intend to stay.
 
			 Ron Keller noted that having a board member with insight to the 
			motel industry is important to the Bureau as much of what the 
			tourism bureau does revolves around bringing people into the 
			community for overnight stays. The hotel/motel tax is based on 
			“heads in beds,” and the goal of the bureau is to help promote 
			tourist activity that will increase the heads in bed on an annual 
			basis, thereby increasing the revenue generated by the tax.
 Wheat is a lifelong resident of the Lincoln area, who says she has a 
			love for the town as well as the county on the whole. Her 
			professional career includes years as an employee at Lincoln 
			Developmental Center in Lincoln and also eight years working for the 
			city of Lincoln at City Hall.
 
 Wheat is heavily involved with the Humane Society of Logan County 
			and serves annually on the garage sale committee, and this past year 
			worked beside Judy Conzo in a new First Responder calendar 
			fundraiser, both of these events are highly successful for the HSLC.
 
 Sasse explained that the board would discuss the three applicants in 
			executive session, and then would present to the Lincoln City 
			Council the names of those they wish to add. The council will then 
			provide their “advice and consent” to the appointments. Sasse said 
			the board would make its decision, and submit the names to the 
			council in time to have the council vote next Monday evening.
 
 Hoagland presented an update on the hotel/motel tax, showing the 
			board that the dollars collected by local motels is trending 
			downward somewhat. Hoagland said he had met with Lincoln Treasurer 
			Chuck Conzo for a review of the numbers over the past few years, and 
			on a month-to-month basis the numbers have dropped to a point that 
			the total for this year may be about $30,000 short of previous 
			years.
 
 Board member and Lincoln Alderman Steve Parrott said he was confused 
			as to why the numbers are down, when the local motels report that 
			they are often fully booked. He asked if the motels were current in 
			their payments to the city. Hoagland said that Conzo had reported 
			there were some issues that needed to be “cleaned up in December.” 
			This could mean a bit of a catch up on revenues in the January 
			report, which has not yet been completed.
 
			
			 It was also noted there were a few months where the numbers didn’t 
			seem to be in line with what was going on in the community. The 
			question became, had there been an issue with the city making the 
			payments in those months, or had something else gone wrong the board 
			wasn’t aware of.
 Sasse said she felt that Hoagland should look into this further, and 
			see if the questions can be answered. Parrott also noted that while 
			there were months that varied widely from year to year in 2014 and 
			2015, at the end of the year, the net difference was only $7,000.
 
 Hoagland also reported that he had met with Lincoln Mayor Marty 
			Neitzel and City Administrator Clay Johnson regarding the funding 
			agreement between the two entities. He said during that discussion, 
			bullet number nine was removed from the agreement. Sasse would later 
			explain that bullet nine referred to the tourism putting money into 
			capital investments for tourism. She said the word capital implied 
			putting money in brick and mortar projects, and that was not in line 
			with the role of the bureau.
 Hoagland also said that the 
			amendments to the new Tourism by-laws that had been requested by the 
			city have been added, and the document is now ready for board 
			approval. The board voted unanimously to approve the amended 
			by-laws. 
			
			[to top of second column] | 
 
			The tourism board reviewed amendments to the mini-grant application 
			used when organizations apply for advertising funds for their 
			events. The application included a requirement that anyone 
			requesting funds must appear before the board with their request, so 
			as to field questions about their event and the intended use of the 
			funding. 
A second amendment stated that the bureau would award mini-grants to one day 
events, but that the amount awarded would not exceed $500 per event.
 Ron Keller said he was concerned about setting a limit on what the bureau would 
award to one day events. He said there were circumstances where even though it 
was not an overnight event, something held locally could bring in a lot of out 
of town visitors who would stay over.
 
 Shawn Taylor agreed. He said that the city and county wanted the bureau to help 
promote all local tourist events, and that what is considered should not be just 
the heads in beds, even though that does generate the income for the bureau. He 
also noted that some of the one day events go into the night, and there is a 
chance that attendees do stay over and go home the following morning. He noted 
as example the Oktoberfest at the Oasis where live music goes into the late 
hours. Another example was the live concert at the Logan County Fair each year.
 
 Tourism and County Board member Kevin Bateman added that even though the Up in 
Smoke, and Pigs and Swigs is a multiple-day event, there are portions of the 
whole that are completed in one day. Parrot commented also that there are 
vendors who come to the Up in Smoke, and wondered if they stayed in motels. Also 
what about the competitors. Bateman said that in all fairness, there are not all 
that many who stay in local motels. He said many of the competitors stay 
downtown overnight utilizing campers. All-in-all, he said he might guess that 
there are 30 to 40 people who seek motel accommodations.
 
 
Keller also mentioned that he thought the mini-grant application should include 
a request for a total budget for the event. In the past, the board has sometimes 
wondered if they did not support an event what impact it would have. Their 
concern is that they have a limited amount of money to disburse, and they want 
to support the events that need it the most. If one event is able to promote 
itself without help from the tourism bureau, then money would be freed up for an 
event that cannot invest in advertising without tourism dollars. 
Bateman said he wanted to look at that from another perspective. He explained 
that in the case of the BBQ weekend, money received from outside sources frees 
up the money made at the event so that it may be invested elsewhere within the 
competition.
 Parrott suggested that the $500 maximum be taken out of the application and that 
awards could still be given based on a case-by-case method.
 
 Bateman explained how the county board handles such matters. He said an amount 
is set aside annually, and organizations have a one-time opportunity to apply 
for funding. The board makes the decision of who to support, then the total 
dollars budgeted are disbursed. He said the tourism bureau could do something 
similar, opening the application process up only once, and everyone who wanted 
to be considered would apply at the same time for these special funds.
 
 Hoagland said that he would get together with Keller to discuss this further and 
re-write portions of the application.
 
 At the end of the evening Sasse said that it was now time for the board to go 
back to meeting only once per month. She said that many of the issues that had 
to be worked through had required more frequent meetings. However, the bureau 
now appears to be on a steady course, and the board should be able to go back to 
conducting business monthly.
 
 The next meeting will be held on February 20th at 4:45 p.m. at the Best Western.
 
 [Nila Smith]
 
 
 |