Trump banking review
raises fears for global standards talks
Send a link to a friend
[February 07, 2017]
By Huw Jones
(Reuters) - President Donald Trump's review of post-crisis banking rules
could sound the death knell for new global standards now being finalised
and rip apart a common approach to regulating international lenders,
bankers and regulators said.
Central banks and watchdogs around the world have spent the past eight
years drawing up regulation aimed at preventing a repeat of the
2007-2009 financial crisis, but there are fears that project could
unravel after Trump said he wants the U.S. to row back on capital rules.
Trump's order for a regulatory review to overcome what he sees as
obstacles to lending came as banking watchdogs were trying to complete
the final piece of global capital requirements, known as Basel III.
Given that the United States wants to shrink the banking rule book,
there are doubts over whether the Basel rules can make it over the
finishing line next month if they don't have backing from the United
Without support from the world's biggest capital market, other countries
would be less willing to commit too.
The core aim of the outstanding part of Basel III that regulators are
working on - dubbed Basel IV by critical banks who worry about more
stringent capital requirements - is to impose more consistency into how
banks calculate the amount of capital they hold against risky assets
JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon said in the aftermath of the
financial crisis that European rivals had been "a lot more aggressive"
than American banks in calculating capital, meaning they were holding
European policymakers have rejected that criticism, but their region's
banks have been lobbying against the remaining Basel rules, saying they
would force them to increase significantly the amount of capital they
need to hold.
If the United States fails to approve the completion of Basel III, the
perceived problem that European banks get away with holding less capital
than U.S. lenders may not be properly tackled, a source involved in the
"It's in the interests of American banks to get this done," the source
Others are less optimistic that a deal can now be done after Trump's
"It's going to delay completing Basel III, and perhaps lead to it not
being concluded," an adviser to banks said on condition of anonymity.
"I do fear that Basel IV is doomed," a banking industry official added.
There are headwinds from elsewhere, too.
Patrick McHenry, Republican vice chairman of the House financial
services committee, fired a warning shot at Federal Reserve Governor
Janet Yellen about the Basel talks in a letter dated Jan. 31, ahead of
Trump's executive order.
The Fed must "cease" all attempts to negotiate binding standards
"burdening American business" until the Trump Administration has had the
opportunity to nominate officials that prioritize "America's best
interests", McHenry said.
While lawmakers often call on regulators to ease pressure on firms,
regulators said Trump's intervention in banking rules gives more clout
to McHenry's warning.
The Basel Committee declined to comment.
[to top of second column]
Trump's decision to review existing, post-crisis banking rules has rung alarm
bells among regulators outside the country.
Mario Draghi, president of the European Central Bank, which regulates the euro
zone's main lenders, said on Monday that easing banking rules could threaten
Draghi was chairman of the Group of 20 Economies' (G20) regulatory task force,
the Financial Stability Board, which during the financial crisis was
instrumental in building up a global approach to reinforcing banking standards.
A former regulator said the United States would be scoring an own goal by
withdrawing from multilateral bodies like Basel as it would no longer be shaping
rules that impinge on U.S. banking competitiveness globally. "It's early days,
but what we have seen in language and rhetoric from Washington is worrying,"
said David Wright, a former top EU official who was part of crisis-era efforts
to create the global regulatory consensus. "If you break international
consensus, you are effectively opening up a regulatory race and heaven knows
where it will end," said Wright, now at Flint Global, which advises companies on
Wright was referring to what was seen in the run-up to the financial crisis,
when countries like Britain resorted to a "light touch" approach to banks to
make London a more attractive financial center.
Valdis Dombrovskis, the EU's financial services chief, said last week that
international regulatory cooperation had been vital in tackling the financial
crisis and must continue.
Much will hinge on how much regulatory change Trump can actually push through.
Former Democratic Congressman Barney Frank, who jointly sponsored the Dodd Frank
Act that Trump wants to review, told the BBC last week he does not expect
Congress to approve the wholesale rolling back of rules, but the Trump
administration could pressure U.S. regulators to ease up on applying existing
requirements. Anil Kashyap, a Bank of England policymaker, said last month that
Trump's nomination for the powerful role of Fed Vice Chair in charge of banking
supervision would shape the U.S. approach to international rule-making.
It will have a "huge impact", a regulatory source added. The fear among global
regulators is that multilateral bodies like the Basel Committee and the
Financial Stability Board could be abandoned by the United States under Trump.
Jose Ignacio Goirigolzarri, chairman of Spain's Bankia, told Spanish television
on Tuesday he would be concerned if Trump was questioning the usefulness of
international banking rules.
"It would worry me very much because I think it's very important, very relevant
that there have been advances in the homogenization of regulation amongst
developed countries," he said.
(Additional reporting by Paul Day in Madrid, editing by Giles Elgood
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.