Most U.S. aid groups
working abroad hobbled by banking barriers: survey
Send a link to a friend
[February 07, 2017]
By Yeganeh Torbati
(Reuters) - Most U.S. aid groups working abroad face the unintended
consequences of U.S. banking regulations aimed at preventing terrorist
financing, just as the number of people displaced worldwide has reached
record levels, according to a survey published on Tuesday.
Two-thirds of U.S. non-profits working internationally experience
banking problems, according to the survey commissioned by the Charity &
Security Network and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Fifteen percent of non-profits experienced those problems constantly or
regularly. Smaller organizations were more likely to face banking
barriers, the report found.
Major western banks have pulled out of certain lines of business or
parts of the world because they fear violating tighter U.S. regulations,
a trend referred to as "de-risking." Those hit hardest include
charities, money remittance services, and even entire regions.
The most common problems charities face include delayed wire transfers,
sometimes stretching into weeks, requests for more documentation, and
higher fees, the survey found. Some non-profits see their accounts
closed or banks refuse to open accounts for them in the first place.
Non-profits are forced to use riskier ways to move money, including
carrying cash, the report said.
The Swasia Charity Foundation has had problems accessing banking
services ever since it was founded in New Jersey in 2012 to provide aid
to Syrians affected by the civil war, Rami Bitar, a board member, said
in an interview.
[to top of second column]
2014, Bank of America Corp <BAC.N> blocked a transfer for about $35,000 because
Swasia's treasurer mentioned the money was destined for an education program in
a Syrian village. The bank asked for more information and in the end did not
complete the transfer, Bitar said.
The same year, JPMorgan Chase & Co <JPM.N> gave the group two months' notice
before it closed its account, Bitar said.
"We did not inquire about why or whether they can do it or not," Bitar said. "We
assumed the reason behind it is that we are a charity for the Syrian people and
simply that was it."
of America and JPMorgan Chase declined to comment.
Critics say the U.S. government is primarily concerned with stopping terrorist
financing, an approach they argue drives transactions outside the formal
financial system and makes it harder to track illicit activity.
"They want the bad guys out and that's the only thing they're set up to do,"
said Scott Paul, senior humanitarian policy advisor at Oxfam America.
A State Department official said the U.S. government's interests are served by
charities being allowed to do their work, but that priority competes with that
of protecting the global financial system from abuse.
"It's not like there are great solutions that are leaping forward that are being
ignored by anyone," said the official, on condition of anonymity.
The Treasury Department declined to comment.
(Reporting by Yeganeh Torbati; Editing by Yara Bayoumy and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.