Welch asks for public hearing and
input on waste hauler contract
Send a link to a friend
[July 30, 2017]
- On Tuesday evening, the Lincoln City Council met for their
Committee of the Whole Workshop. Five aldermen were present, Rick
Hoefle, Kathy Horn, Ron Keller, Steve Parrott and Tracy Welch.
Included in the items discussed for the next voting agenda were bid
proposals for trash collection services within the city limits. The
city has been looking into a hauler contract that would offer
options for recycling that in the end could cost less than the
annual support paid to the Logan County Joint Solid Waste program.
Currently the LCJSW is serving the city without a clear contract for
the 2017-18 fiscal year. The city council voted to extend their
contract with the LCJSW recently, while they continue to investigate
Tuesday, City Administrator Clay Johnson said the city had gone out
for bid on a contract with specifications that included three
options for waste hauling and recycling. Three companies - Area
Disposal, Advanced Disposal, and Waste Management had submitted
Johnson explained what the options were.
Option one: Weekly collection of garbage and recycling curbside.
Option two: Weekly collection of garbage and collection of recycling
Option three: Weekly collection of garbage and a collection bin
location in the city, similar to what is on Kickapoo Street and
managed by the LCJSW.
Johnson said additional specifications were that the entire city be
collected within one business day, but said the city would consider
a proposal that would divide the city into regions, IF that would
provide a savings to the homeowner or property owner.
Johnson said there were not cut and dried bids, because of the
He also noted that Area Disposal had submitted a fourth option that
permitted them to provide the recycling bins to customers with
recycling collected every two weeks, but also permitted for a large
collection bin at a public location. That bid came in at $14.71 per
month per customer with a two-point-five percent escalator.
All bids are for the contract to begin October 1st. All the bids
were projected out for five years. The base contract would be 3
years with an additional two year option.
Advance Disposal bid for 2017
$16.25 for option one
$15.25 for option two
$14.25 for option three
Waste Management bid
Option one: $21.20
Option two: $18.30
Option three: $15.30
Area Disposal bid
Option one: $16.57
Option two: $15.17
Option three: 13.05
Additional fourth option: $14.71
Reviewing the net costs of the contracts, Johnson said that Waste
Management’s bids were not comparable to the others, so eliminating
them from consideration, the other two companies were left as the
Comparing the costs, he noted that Advanced Disposal was the lower
of the two in option one. In Option two, the 2017 price was higher
from Advanced, but over a five year period would end up being less
costly for the consumer, but minimally.
In option three Area was the lowest cost.
Johnson said that the two companies were offering comparable
pricing, so what he felt the aldermen needed to consider was the
level of service provided.
Johnson also offered a professional opinion that the first option
was pretty high and offered services residents may not need. He said
specifically that he felt there was a small chance that any resident
would fill a 95 gallon recycling bin each week, so perhaps looking
at the recycling collection every other week might be best.
Johnson said that in the request for proposals the city had included
specifications for city-wide cleanup events, trash collection during
festivals and other events, and a discount for senior citizens. All
three had complied with the request.
Rick Hoefle offered comments and questions. He said he had checked
his personal trash bill, and noted that these bids were less, so he
felt like the companies were offering a “pretty good deal.” However,
he said that in the past, the trash hauler had added a fuel
surcharge to the bill, and he wondered if that would be possible
with these contracts. Johnson said it would not. He told the council
“The amount quoted will be the amount charged.” He went on to say
that the companies might add an administrative fee to the accounts
that pay with a credit card.
[to top of second column]
Tracy Welch said that he could see there were pros and cons to
this type of program, but what he noted was that the city would be saving the
dollars paid to the LCJSW, which comes to $65,000 per year.
He noted that there were differences in how the billing would be handled. He
said one company was going to do the billing to Lincoln residents, while another
had stated that the city would have to do the billing. He noted that the
mandated plan would also impact the zoning and ordinance programs.
Welch concluded that he wanted to take his time considering this, and that he
also wanted the city to take the time to collect constituent feedback about the
Hoefle said that there was another subject to consider. He said “This is going
to be a mandate. I agree with Alderman Welch, I want the public to not only
understand the savings, but understand they are all in. How are we going to make
those who currently don’t use any of our disposals; how are we going to bring
Hoefle commented on the savings of $65,000 per year and said he wanted to see
that money go toward something positive, “even a tax reduction to the citizens.”
He said that that giving the taxpayers the savings could make the mandate “more
Johnson said that he felt that the mandate would actually help the code
enforcement office with some of its trash issues. He said that if the city were
to mandate constituent participation, the aldermen would have to pass an
ordinance requiring participation.
A member of the audience immediately questioned the legality of such a mandate.
Johnson said that it was legal, and he named off several other towns that have
this type of program and run it successfully.
City Treasurer Chuck Conzo commented that mandating would add costs to
constituents who are currently not subscribing to a trash service. He said that
these could be folks who have a very good reason for not paying for trash
service. He also noted that creating a mandate was denying the citizens of
Lincoln the freedom of choice.
Ron Keller said he agreed with Welch, that aldermen should take their time in
considering this and should talk to the residents in their respective wards.
Welch reiterated he felt there needed to be a public hearing. He said he wanted
to table any action.
Johnson said the topic should be tabled until the July 17th meeting of the
council, and Mayor Seth Goodman then verified the councils wished to table this
item and hold a public hearing. All those present appeared to agree by nod of
Contact information for Lincoln aldermen is listed below:
Steve Parrott Alderman Ward 1 - Phone: 217-871-9224
Tracy Welch Alderman Ward 1 - Phone: (217)671-1589
Kathleen Horn Alderman Ward 2 - Phone: 217-732-3437
Michelle Bauer Alderman Ward 2 - Phone: 217-750-1061
Ron Keller Alderman Ward 3 - Phone: 217-732-5476
Heidi Browne Alderwoman Ward 3 - Phone: 217-871-4061
Rick Hoefle Alderman Ward 4 - Phone: 612-805-9845
Jeff Hoinacki Alderman Ward 4 - Phone: 217-871-7504
The city of Lincoln website also provides an email resource. Use this
And follow the drill-down for your alderman to the “contact form” page.
Press release from the city of Lincoln
Copy of information presented to the council: