Supreme Court to hear major case on
Send a link to a friend
[June 20, 2017]
By Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court agreed on Monday to decide whether the U.S. Constitution limits
how far lawmakers can go to redraw voting districts to favor one
political party over another in a case that could have huge consequences
for American elections.
The high court has been willing to invalidate state electoral maps on
the grounds of racial discrimination, as it did on May 22 when it found
that Republican legislators in North Carolina had drawn two electoral
districts to diminish the statewide political clout of black voters.
But the justices have not thrown out state electoral maps drawn simply
to give one party an advantage over another.
The justices will take up Wisconsin's appeal of a lower court ruling
last November that state Republican lawmakers violated the Constitution
when they created state legislative districts with the partisan aim of
hobbling Democrats in legislative races. The case will be one of the
biggest heard by the Supreme Court during its term that begins in
The case involves a long-standing practice known as gerrymandering, a
term meaning manipulating electoral boundaries for an unfair political
advantage. The lower court ruled that the Republican-led legislature's
redrawing of state legislative districts in 2011 amounted to "an
unconstitutional partisan gerrymander."
A panel of three federal judges in Madison ruled 2-1 that the way the
Republicans redrew the districts violated the U.S. Constitution's
guarantees of equal protection under the law and free speech by
undercutting the ability of Democratic voters to turn their votes into
seats in Wisconsin's legislature.
In a possible sign of deep ideological divisions among the nine justices
over the issue, the court's conservative majority granted Wisconsin's
request, despite opposition from the four liberal justices, to put on
hold the lower court's order requiring the state to redraw its electoral
maps by Nov. 1.
That means Wisconsin will not need to put in place a new electoral map
while the justices consider the matter.
A Supreme Court ruling faulting the Wisconsin redistricting plan could
have far-reaching consequences for the redrawing of electoral districts
due after the 2020 U.S. census. State and federal legislative district
boundaries are reconfigured every decade after the census so that each
one holds about same number of people, but are sometimes draw in a way
that packs voters who tend to favor a particular party into certain
districts so as to diminish their statewide voting power.
Wisconsin Republican Attorney General Brad Schimel welcomed the
justices' decision to hear the state's appeal and called the state's
redistricting process "entirely lawful and constitutional."
The case in the short term could affect congressional maps in about half
a dozen states and legislative maps in about 10 states, before having
major implications for the post-2020 redistricting, according to the New
York University School of Law's Brennan Center for Justice.
[to top of second column]
A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington,
U.S., November 15, 2016. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
'POLITICS GOING HAYWIRE'
"Wisconsin's gerrymander was one of the most aggressive of the
decade, locking in a large and implausibly stable majority for
Republicans in what is otherwise a battleground state," said Brennan
Center redistricting expert Thomas Wolf. "It's a symptom of politics
going haywire and something that we increasingly see when one party
has sole control of the redistricting process."
Justice Anthony Kennedy, a conservative who sometimes sides with the
court's liberals in major cases, could cast the decisive vote.
Kennedy, writing in a 2004 case, indicated he may be open to the
idea that racial gerrymanders could violate the Constitution. Though
a "workable standard" defining it did not exist, he suggested one
might emerge in a future case.
Democrats have accused Republicans of taking improper actions at the
state level to suppress the turnout of minority voters and others
who tend to support Democrats and maximize the number of party
members in state legislatures and the U.S. House of Representatives.
Republicans call their actions lawful.
Republicans control the U.S. Congress. They also have majorities in
an all-time high of 69 of 99 state legislative chambers, according
to the Republican State Leadership Committee.
After winning control of the state legislature in 2010, Wisconsin
Republicans redrew the statewide electoral map.
They were able to amplify Republican voting power, gaining more
seats than their percentage of the statewide vote would suggest. In
2012, Republicans received about 49 percent of the vote but won 60
of the 99 state Assembly seats. In 2014, the party garnered 52
percent of the vote and 63 Assembly seats.
A dozen Wisconsin Democratic Party voters in 2015 sued state
election officials, saying the redistricting divided Democratic
voters in some areas and packed them in others to dilute their
electoral clout and benefit Republican candidates.
The lower court found that redistricting efforts are unlawful
partisan gerrymandering when they seek to entrench the party in
power, and have no other legitimate justification.
The state argues recent election results favoring Republicans were
"a reflection of Wisconsin's natural political geography," with
Democrats concentrated in urban areas like Milwaukee and Madison.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.