Trump's EPA budget proposal targets
climate, lead cleanup programs
Send a link to a friend
[March 03, 2017]
By Timothy Gardner and Valerie Volcovici
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House is
proposing to slash a quarter of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's budget, targeting climate-change programs and those designed to
prevent air and water pollution like lead contamination, a source with
direct knowledge of the proposal said on Thursday.
President Donald Trump has long signaled his intention to reverse former
Democratic President Barack Obama's climate-change initiatives. But the
Republican president has vowed his planned overhaul of green regulation
would not jeopardize America's water and air quality.
The 23-page 2018 budget proposal, which aims to slice the environmental
regulator's overall budget by 25 percent to $6.1 billion and staffing by
20 percent to 12,400 as part of a broader effort to fund increased
military spending, would cut deeply into programs like climate
protection, environmental justice and enforcement.
Politico and other news outlets reported the staff and overall budget
cuts earlier, but the source disclosed new details on the impact the
cuts would have on programs and grants to states.
Environmentalists slammed the proposed cuts, which must be approved by
the Republican-led Congress.
The agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the
budget proposal or its counter proposal. The White House said it had no
Under the proposal, which was sent to the EPA this week, grants to
states for lead cleanup would be cut 30 percent to $9.8 million,
according to the source, who read the document to Reuters.
Grants to help Native American tribes combat pollution would be cut 30
percent to $45.8 million. An EPA climate protection program on cutting
emissions of greenhouse gases like methane that contribute to global
warming would be cut 70 percent to $29 million.
The proposal would cut funding for the brownfields industrial site
cleanup program by 42 percent to $14.7 million. It would also reduce
funding for enforcing pollution laws by 11 percent to $153 million.
The budget did not cut state revolving funds for programs, that Congress
tapped last year to provide aid to Flint, Michigan, for its lead
All staff at a research program, called Global Change Research, as well
as 37 other programs would be cut under the plan.
Some of the cuts are unlikely to pass the Republican-led Congress as
they are popular with both Democrats and Republicans. Congress would be
unlikely to approve a proposal to cut all staff in a diesel emissions
program, for example.
[to top of second column]
Scott Pruitt, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), speaks to employees of the Agency in Washington, U.S.,
February 21, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
Scott Pruitt, the new head of the EPA, told U.S. mayors on Thursday
he would make a priority of cleanups of industrial and hazardous
waste sites and improving water infrastructure, even as the White
House proposed severe proposed cuts to those programs.
"In this budget discussion that is ongoing with Congress that is
just starting, there are some concerns about some of these grant
programs that EPA has been a part of historically," Pruitt said.
"I want you to know that with the White House and also with
Congress, I am communicating a message that the brownfields program,
the Superfund program and the water infrastructure grants and state
revolving funds are essential to protect," he said.
Greenpeace spokesman Travis Nichols said: "As a candidate, Trump
made a big deal out of EPA's failure in Flint, but now he's cutting
30 percent out of lead cleanup in his proposed budget. This is an
example of his empty promises to do right by the American people."
Officers of the Environmental Council of the States, composed of
local regulators, raised concerns to the White House and EPA about
the budget process, which they said lacked input by directly
ECOS officers will meet with the environment team of the Office and
Management and Budget, a White House office, on Friday and have
slated a teleconference with Pruitt in March.
ECOS head Alexandra Dapolito Dunn said states had been hopeful after
Pruitt's confirmation hearing that they would get resources to do
their work. "Now they are feeling very vulnerable,” she said.
(Reporting by Timothy Gardner and Valerie Volcovici; Editing by
Richard Valdmanis and Peter Cooney)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.