From two would-be Fed leaders, the
central bank needs to change
Send a link to a friend
[May 06, 2017]
By Howard Schneider and Ann Saphir
PALO ALTO, Calif. (Reuters) - Unemployment
is at a decade low, the American economy is growing, and inflation is
nowhere in sight, yet for two leading candidates to head the Federal
Reserve, the central bank needs shaking up.
The Fed is credited by most economists for its rapid response to the
2008 financial crisis. Under Chair Janet Yellen whose term expires next
year, it has been able to shift into post-crisis mode, ceasing to add to
its balance sheet and embarking on a series of rate hikes that will take
interest rates back to "normal".
For former Wall Street banker Kevin Warsh, who served as a Fed governor
at the time of the financial crisis, the economic recovery is
characterized by bloated central bank balance sheets, financial risks,
and a hidebound institution that needs new approaches.
"We should not allow a failure of imagination, a failure of courage," to
impede changes to how the Fed is run, Warsh said in remarks at the
Hoover Institution, an intellectual home of conservative economics where
he is a visiting fellow.
While he did not refer to a potential candidacy for the Fed Chair job,
Warsh's speech struck some in the audience as an audition. Warsh and
Stanford University economics professor John Taylor have emerged as
potential frontrunners to succeed Yellen whose term ends in February
Warsh, a Wall Street lawyer by training rather than one of the Phd
economists who have come to dominate monetary policy in recent years,
called for "fresh air from the real side of the economy, fresh air from
the markets," in revamping the Fed.
He says the central bank has left the public confused, lacks a long-term
strategy, and is too beholden to short-term stock market and other
Warsh, who was consulted frequently by former chair Ben Bernanke when at
the Fed, was speaking at the Hoover Institution, a center of
conservative thinking on monetary policy that has in recent years tried
to amp up its profile in the Washington policy debate.
Along with being close to Bernanke, Warsh has family connections to
President Donald Trump, and is on one of the president's White House
advisory panels - advantages some feel put him on any short list for
IF TRUMP WANTS RULES, THERE IS TAYLOR
Hoover is also Taylor's intellectual base.
Taylor is a favorite among Republicans who feel the Fed should be held
closely to a formula, a "Taylor rule", for setting interest rates and
give up some of the discretion policymakers currently enjoy.
The list of possible chairs is a long one for a president who has
surrounded himself with a not always coherent set of economic advisers
-- from trade skeptics and gold standard advocates to Wall Street
[to top of second column]
Taylor delivers a speech during a plenary session of the annual
meeting of the IADB in Ginowan. REUTERS/Issei Kato
At this point Trump has not indicated whether he thinks the Fed
needs fundamental reform. He has not taken much interest in the
nuances of monetary policy and has three open vacancies on the Fed's
seven-member board of governors.
Trump, who is skeptical of the statistics that are the current Fed's
stock-in-trade, also has not indicated whether he is inclined to
stick with an economist like Taylor to run the central bank or will
turn to a Wall Street figure like Warsh, as he has done for other
top economic appointments
While attending a two-day conference, neither Warsh nor Taylor
referred publicly to whether they want to be Fed chair. But neither
were shy in saying they think the Fed and monetary policy needs to
In a speech on Thursday night, Taylor compared current times to the
situation Paul Volcker faced in the 1970s when he wrangled a
sometimes resistant Fed board to battle inflation with aggressive
interest rate increases.
The implication: that it would be possible to steer a reluctant
central bank towards the sort of regime he and some members of
Congress feels it needs, where rules are agreed for setting interest
rates and followed as closely as possible.
Commercial banks would also be freed from regulation if they agree
to set aside more capital, and the U.S. would make the case
internationally for a more rules-based central bank system.
"The idea is a package” of changes that the central bank could adopt
to overcome what he feels are potentially "destructive" divisions
over policy, Taylor said.
But some policymakers listening to both Warsh and Taylor wondered
whether Trump would actually want the kind of radical change
outlined at Hoover.
St. Louis Fed president James Bullard told Reuters that with the Fed
hitting its targets, Trump might not want to pick “somebody that's
going to deviate substantially from the Bernanke-Yellen policy."
(Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.