Rising Medicare costs leave many U.S. seniors with a
Send a link to a friend
[November 21, 2017]
By Mark Miller
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Millicent Graves will
get a raise from Social Security next year, but her household budget
will get worse, not better.
The 2 percent cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) announced by Social
Security for 2018 last month will boost Graves’ monthly benefit by
$20.70. But in reality, that increase will be wiped out by a higher
Medicare Part B premium, which will be deducted from her Social Security
The federal government announced last Friday that the standard Part B
premium will be $134 per month next year, unchanged from 2017. That
sounds like good news at first blush. But for roughly 70 percent of
seniors, Social Security benefit amounts will stay flat due to the
relationship between the premium and the Social Security cost-of-living
Graves is 73 and lives near Williamsburg, Virginia. Her Social Security
benefit - a little less than $1,000 after Medicare Part B is deducted -
provides roughly half of her total income. The rest comes from
retirement savings, which she will use to close the budget gaps next
year. “It is frustrating, but I’m lucky in that I can handle it. I know
plenty of other people who are living just on Social Security, and it
will be hard for them to get by.”
COLAs are determined by an automatic formula tied to the Consumer Price
Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). From 2013 to
2015, the annual increases ranged around 1.5 percent. No COLA at all was
awarded in 2016; this year, the adjustment was a paltry 0.3 percent.
For most beneficiaries, Medicare Part B premiums are deducted from
Social Security. The impact of the Part B premium on net benefits next
year will vary due to what is known as the “hold harmless” provision
governing Social Security.
By law, the dollar amount of Part B premium increases cannot exceed the
dollar amount of the COLA - a feature that ensures net Social Security
benefits do not fall. The hold-harmless provision applies to the 70
percent of the Medicare population enrolled in both programs. Those not
held harmless include anyone delaying their filing for Social Security
benefits, but others affected include some federal and state government
retirees. Affluent seniors who pay high-income Medicare premium
surcharges also are not protected.
The stingy COLAs of the past two years were rare - but they also set the
stage for the odd 2018 situation now facing Graves and millions of
THE MATH MATTERS
The recent flat COLAs meant that nonprotected Medicare enrollees
shouldered most of the burden of rising Part B premiums; the premiums
for this group jumped sharply in 2016 and 2017. This year, they are
paying $134 per month, while protected beneficiaries are paying an
average of $109.
[to top of second column]
An elderly couple looks out at the ocean as they sit on a park bench
in La Jolla, California November 13, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File
But the more-generous 2018 COLA will spread higher Part B program costs across
the entire Medicare population. That means premiums will stay flat for this
year’s nonprotected enrollees, while the protected group will pay more.
“The lower the benefit the lower the Medicare Part B premium people were paying
in 2017 and the more they need to reach $134,” said Mary Johnson, a policy
consultant at the Senior Citizens League. “The upshot is Part B will take their
The hold-harmless situation affects people differently according to the level of
their Social Security benefit. A held-harmless beneficiary with a $2,000 monthly
benefit would still receive a net COLA of $15 next year, for example. But the
COLA flattens to zero with a monthly benefit of around $1,250 and below.
The math matters to many seniors living on fixed incomes. Half of all Medicare
beneficiaries had income below $26,200 in 2016, according to the Kaiser Family
Foundation - a figure that includes Social Security, pensions, retirement
account withdrawals, wages, and other miscellaneous income sources.
At the same time, 62 percent of beneficiaries relied on Social Security for more
than half of their income in 2015, according to the Social Security
Administration; 34 percent relied on the program for 90 percent or more of
income. Seniors heavily reliant on Social Security find themselves forced to
make tough choices as healthcare consumes a larger share of income.
Graves is a former veterinary technician who also sold real estate for a few
years before retiring. She claimed Social Security at the earliest possible age
- 62 - to help pay the premiums on her health insurance. Now, she finds a
variety of expenses rising sharply, including her Medigap and Part D
prescription drug plans, homeowners insurance and utilities.
“I never realized before how people can just work all their lives and then
retire and find themselves living on the edge,” she said. “I am not going to
starve because of this, but I know people who could.”
(The writer is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)
(Editing by Matthew Lewis)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.