| 
			 Logan County Board to put jail and 
			courthouse building costs to public by referendum 
			 
            Send a link to a friend 
            
 
			
			
			 [November 28, 2017] 
            
			 
			
			
			LINCOLN   
			On 
			Tuesday, November 21, the Logan County Board voted to put a 
			referendum on the March ballot for repairs to the courthouse.  
			 
			Building and Grounds Chairman Kevin Bateman made a motion to go out 
			for bids for repairs for the interior and exterior dome of the 
			Courthouse, which passed unanimously.  
			 
			Bateman has been researching contractors and said bids for the dome 
			repair will be done by a reliable contractor.  
			 
			Board member Gene Rohlfs asked if the contractor would write 
			specifications.  
			 
			Bateman said the contractor would design the Requests for Proposal 
			to meet specifications. The contractor also plans to bid on the 
			repairs.  
			 
			Bateman said the dome is in dire need of repair and small pieces 
			have already fallen off. It would cost $157,000 to take the oculus, 
			the circular opening at the dome's center, out of the building. They 
			would then store it for restoration and put up a Lexan (high 
			strength plexiglass) dome to keep the heat and cold out. The Lexan 
			dome would be resistant to the smaller pieces falling.  
			 
			Bateman's motion to put a referendum on the ballot in March for 
			building restoration purposes in the amount of $4 million, including 
			a feasibility study on what it would take to build a new facility.
			 
			 
			Bateman said he wanted to discuss bumping up the referendum amount 
			to $15 M because the county also needs a new jail facility.  
			 
			Board member Gene Rohlfs said if we are talking about a new facility 
			to increase capacity in addition to repairs at courthouse, we are 
			probably "conservative" with the $15 M figure.  
			 
			State's Attorney Jonathan Wright said the public should be informed 
			that in the executive session that evening, the board discussed 
			security issues at the jail. That discussion turned into a motion 
			for the possibility to expand the jail as part of this bond 
			referendum. The jail expansion is based on numbers.  
			 
			Wright said new prison reform coming will "put more pressure on 
			local county jails as opposed to few Department of Correction 
			sentences."  
			
			
			  
			Bateman said the new laws going into effect January 1st mean the 
			county will have to expand the jail to add jail cells.  
			 
			Board Chairman Chuck Ruben asked Bateman about a $19 M, 188-bed jail 
			up north.  
			 
			Bateman said the one Ruben referred to was built brand new from the 
			ground up for $19 M.  
			 
			Bateman said in discussion with other board members and sheriff, if 
			we can add on to the facility we have since we have the land to do 
			so, the figure would be about $10 M.  
			 
			The dome part of the roof and the oculus inside is 112 years old and 
			repair would be about $3.5 million. The outside elevator is obsolete 
			and if one part breaks, they are taking spare parts from the spare 
			elevator, and Bateman got a rough estimate from an elevator firm for 
			an outside elevator. Bateman said a couple other projects need to be 
			addressed at the courthouse, which puts the amount just shy of $14 
			M, so he "rounded the amount to $15 M to cover it all."  
			 
			Ruben said it would be an increase in property taxes. On a $4.4 M 
			bond paid back in 20 years, it would mean a $14 increase in annual 
			property taxes for someone who owns a $100,000 home.  
			 
			Ruben said if you keep doubling that amount out, you get a higher 
			increase, which becomes a substantial burden on taxpayers.  
			 
			Rohlfs said he would like to eliminate that on the tax burden 
			through a sunset clause.  
			 
			Ruben said he did not think a sunset clause would be needed. Once 
			the bond is paid off, the higher tax rate would go away.  
			
			
			  
			
			
			[to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
Board member David Hepler asked if they could vote on the issue 
without having the language for the referendum.  
 
Ruben said the board has until January 2 to put the issue on the March 
referendum, They can get the bond company to come in and write the resolutions 
in December.  
 
Board member Scott Schaffenacker said the last building referendum was in 1972. 
He motioned to amend the referendum amount to $15 M.  
 
Bateman has reached out to other counties as he researched the issue and said 
Livingston County just built a new facility with courtrooms for $13 M, which did 
not include a jail. Bateman said $15 M is "still extremely frugal with taxpayer 
dollars." 
			 
  
Wright asked the board if they could accomplish getting this issue on the 
referendum between now and March. When the Public Safety Tax was put on the 
ballot, Sheriff Nichols and EMA Director Dan Fulscher had 17 town hall meetings. 
One county had 47 town hall meetings about a jail expansion and the measure 
"barely passed."  
 
Wright said there is only so much political capital to go to the public with a 
bond referendum and you cannot keep coming back to the public every couple years 
asking for more bond and more tax money. The voting public may ask why the 
amount is $15 M and not $12 M or some other figure.  
 
Bateman said there is not enough time to sell the issue properly. The problem is 
the courthouse is in need of immediate repair because small pieces are already 
falling from the dome. They have not done a feasibility study on the jail yet 
either.  
 
Bateman said he would look to remodel and expand on the jail we already have.
 
 
Bateman said he would tell citizens who ask, we are under a time crunch and we 
have come up with the best number we possibly can. He said they could easily 
stay under $15 M and come in under budget.  
 
Schaffenacker asked about putting the issue on the November ballot and motioned 
they amend it to put it on the November ballot.  
 
Bateman asked about putting it on the November ballot if it fails on the March 
ballot. That would give the board time to "sell" the issue.  
 
Rohlfs said he has seen some referendums take three or four times to pass.  
 
The motion to put the referendum for $4 M on the March ballot passed 7-5 with 
Kevin Bateman, Janet Dahmm, Emily Davenport, David Hepler, Gloria Luster, Scott 
Schaffenacker and Annette Welch voting yes; and Dave Blankenship, Bob Farmer, 
Gene Rohlfs, Chuck Ruben, and Bob Sanders voting no.
			 
  
The amended motion to put a $15 M referendum on the ballot in March passed 8-4 
with Kevin Bateman, Janet Dahmm, Emily Davenport, David Hepler, Gloria Luster, 
Chuck Ruben, Scott Schaffenacker and Annette Welch voting yes; and Dave 
Blankenship, Bob Farmer, Gene Rohlfs, and Bob Sanders voting no.  
 
Ruben said it is a difficult decision, but putting it on the ballot will give 
people a chance to look on it and decide whether it is a worthwhile expense.  
 
Board members present were Kevin Bateman, Dave Blankenship, Janet Dahmm, Emily 
Davenport, Bob Farmer, David Hepler, Gloria Luster, Gene Rohlfs, Bob Sanders, 
Scott Schaffenacker and Annette Welch, with Board Chairman Chuck Ruben 
presiding. 
 
[Angela Reiners]  |