|
 A nationally representative online survey of 16,280 U.S. adults
found that many ascribe health benefits to marijuana that haven't
been proven, researchers report in Annals of Internal Medicine.
"The American public has a much more favorable point of view than is
warranted by the evidence," said the study's lead author, Dr.
Salomeh Keyhani of the University of California, San Francisco.
"Perhaps most concerning is that they think that it prevents health
problems."
While studies have shown that cannabis can help quiet seizures in
children with hard to treat epilepsy, quell the nausea and vomiting
that can accompany chemotherapy and sooth nerve pain, there's no
evidence that it can help with the vast majority of other medical
conditions, Keyhani said. And yet, people think of it as a cure all,
she added.
"Google marijuana benefits and the top hit is a Business Insider
story titled '23 Health Benefits of Marijuana,'" Keyhani said.
The new survey looked at public perceptions of the benefits and
risks of cannabis. Keyhani and her colleagues found that more than
one third (36.9 percent) of respondents thought edible marijuana
could prevent health problems, and more than a quarter (29.2
percent) believed smoking or vaping marijuana was protective.
While 76 percent believed marijuana could be addictive, 22.4 percent
thought it had no addictive potential. Scientists have found that
nine percent of people become addicted to cannabis.
Heartening news - that 92.1 percent thought marijuana was unsafe
during pregnancy - was undercut by the fact that 7.3 percent thought
it was somewhat or completely safe. "That 7 percent is a lot of
people who think that it's OK during pregnancy," Keyhani said.
Also worrisome is the fact that 27.6 percent thought driving while
under the influence of marijuana was safer than driving while drunk.
Keyhani suspects that a big part of the problem is that there is
little, if any, regulation of cannabis advertising. "It's a
multibillion dollar industry," she said. "That's big business."
[to top of second column] |
Another part of the problem is that Americans seem to conflate
legality with safety, said Dr. Ajay Wasan, a professor of
anesthesiology and psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh School
of Medicine and vice chair for pain medicine at the University of
Pittsburgh Medical Center.
"People perceive it as more like a dietary supplement than as a
Schedule I drug with addiction potential," said Wasan, who is
unaffiliated with the new study.
Classification of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, which puts it in
the same category as heroin, LSD and ecstasy, has gotten in the way
of a lot of research, said Dr. Timothy Fong, a professor of
addiction psychiatry at the University of California, Los Angeles,
and a faculty member of the UCLA Cannabis Research Initiative.
When a substance is Schedule I, scientists need to jump through a
lot of regulatory hoops to do research, Fong said. "We want to do
more studies, but we can't do a darn thing if the federal government
handcuffs us," he added. "This is the kind of study (Keyhani's) that
I think elevates the discussion. And it shows we have a long way to
go."
Fong suspects that with little actual data on cannabis, the public
gets their information from "pop culture, television shows,
celebrities, social media and cannabis conventions."
One big reason people think cannabis is safe is there aren't
overdose deaths, said Fong. But that doesn't mean there aren't any
deaths. "People get intoxicated and they fall off roofs or they get
into automobile accidents," Fong said. "Sometimes they show up in
the hospital with a psychotic condition."
Without research, laws are driven by politics, Fong said, adding "I
like science based legislation."
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2wYH0qu Annals of Internal Medicine, online
July 23, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |
