Spring 2018 Logan County
Farm Outlook Magazine

'Tax Bill 199a' boost to coop elevators, raises local concerns
 

Send a link to a friend  Share

[March 24, 2018]  Some analysts say that the changes to section 199 were an unintended mistake, while others are saying that the advantages given to coops in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) were intentional. Whether intentional or not, 199a has been described as “a seismic shift5.”

President Donald Trump signed the Republican tax overhaul into law in December that allows farmers a 20 percent tax deduction on payments for sales of crops to co-ops, but not for sales to private or investor-owned grains handlers1.

Some lawmakers have said they made a mistake by including the new language in last-minute changes to the bill1. The last minute addition to the tax bill passed late last year was supposed to continue an existing tax break that benefited cooperatives2, not make this significant change.

Rob Holcomb, a University of Minnesota Extension educator and tax expert, says farmers can gain thousands of dollars in tax breaks by selling their grain to a co-op. Here's how it works: If a farmer sells grain to a privately owned grain elevator, they can claim a 20 percent deduction on the net proceeds, or profit, from the sale. But if they sell to a cooperative they can claim the 20 percent deduction on the gross, or total amount of the sale. Holcomb used a simplistic example. A farmer sells $500,000 worth of grain and makes $100,000 in profit. Selling to a co-op would result in a $100,000 tax benefit, while selling to a private company limits the tax benefit to $20,0002.

The impact of 199a might mean that some producers would be able to wipe out all their federal tax liability.

On Wednesday February 14, Republican U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch said he and other senators were working toward “a solution to this issue that does not choose winners and losers1.”

There are, though, some state organizations that feel enthusiastic about maintaining it. The genie may be out of the bottle and will be hard to put back in4.

Teresa Castanias, a Certified Public Accountant, led the effort to get this special provision for cooperatives into old Section 199. She thinks that it is possible that there won't be a fix negotiated. “From what I have seen, negotiations are going nowhere at this point. Everything they try hurts someone, and they are fixated on the “double counting” aspect of this (income to the patron is a deduction for the coop). Current 199A(g) doesn’t have a double counting problem though, so I am not sure why they haven’t worked more from that angle. The 199A(g) benefit should still be pretty good for most ag coops. From what I hear, there is a growing interest in keeping the law as is from all parties involved. Particularly in the farm sector where word is out in the press that farm income is down to a 12 year low nationwide. I was at an ag coop conference last week, and that was the general mood of the participants that I talked to4.”

Castanias said, “Of even greater interest is that the provision creates a huge opening for professionals to work around the Section 199A exclusions. Worker owned cooperatives in the fields of health, law, accounting, etc. are not out of the question4” to take advantage of these tax benefits.

If legislators are going to make changes, they will want to make them soon. The longer the delay, the more costly it is to the government and to non-cooperative grain and livestock buyers. It also becomes, as you note, the status quo, and harder to reverse4.

Locally, 199a is having quite an impact. However at this time Paul Crombie, CEO of Elkhart Grain, a private grain company said, “In this post harvest time the effect is hard to gauge but we don’t greatly feel the full effect of 199a yet.”

Crombie said, “Legislators indicated 199a had unintended consequences they were going to fix. If it stands as written, producers will sell grain to coops. So far the U.S. Senate is not releasing any language, and both producers and consumers are anxiously awaiting the specific changes in the language of the bill. The advantage of selling to a coop at today’s prices would amount to about 70 cents on a bushel.” Elkhart Grain has had some limited discussion on becoming a coop. Crombie believes that if it stands, then businesses outside of ag may find their way to also get the tax credit.

[to top of second column

General Manager Troy Bauer of Hartsburg Grain, a private grain company, said that they "are a private surrounded by coops. If the law doesn’t change, in the long run it will put us out of business. If it doesn’t change by harvest, it will have a dramatic effect.”

“We are operating assuming it is going to get fixed. Dysfunctional as Washington DC is, though, we are not 100% sure it is going to get done. Timing is really important,” Bauer said.

Bauer said, “For Hartsburg Grain, because of our size and financial restraints, becoming a coop is not a viable choice.”

“The fear is that we will not see profitable volume. Our costs are fixed and we need a certain volume to cover our operating costs. Hartsburg Grain is in a strong enough financial position that we could handle it one season but not two,” Bauer added.

Finally, Bauer said, “There are challenges every year. This is one challenge I can do nothing about.”

Scott Docherty, CEO/General Manager of Top Flight Grain in Monticello, a coop grain company with elevators in Logan County, said, “We have seen an increase in calls from current customers and others who have traditionally not been customers of Top Flight inquiring about becoming members.”

Docherty believes there will be resolution put forth in the March 23 Omnibus Spending Bill that is currently before the U.S. Congress.

Docherty said, “If it does not get amended, coops will see a pickup from producers.” He does not think they will get overrun, but would likely experience a 10-20% increase.

In a conciliatory note, Docherty said they were not out to steal customers. “Top Flight will work with the privates to allow their customers to sell to our coop to receive the tax credit but then give the sale to the private elevator they usually do business with.”

Docherty said he wants to make sure people know that it will get worked out, and believes that the tax code will revert back in an amendment to eliminate the language giving tax credits of 20% on the gross.


[Jim Youngquist]

1U.S. tax law co-op preference 'wasted money': agricultural companies by Tom Polansek, Mark Weinraub

2Co-op chaos: Provision from tax bill has farmers, companies scrambling by Dan Gunderson

3Lobbies Seek Ag Tax Change by Chris Clayton

4Cooperative Glitch In Tax Bill May Mean Food Fight In Congress by Peter J Reilly

5A “seismic shift”: Federal tax changes jeopardize private grain elevator business By Morgan Chilson
 

Read all the articles in our new
Spring 2018 Logan County
Farm Outlook Magazine

Title
CLICK ON TITLES TO GO TO PAGES
Page
The Big Picture 4
Tax Bill 199a boost to coop elevators raises local concerns 8
Is a re-designed NAFTA an exercise in futility or just a political pawn? 13
The Dicamba dilemma:  turning neighbor against neighbor 17
Seed corn growers move out of Logan County 24
Impacts of wind and solar farms 27
Illinois Farmers get shor reprieve from EPA's restrictive WOTUS Act 31
Wading through the confusion of crop classification 35
Logan County corn and soybean 2017 crop yields 40

< Recent features

Back to top