Lincoln City Council:
Liquor Ordinance to get re-write
Rick Hoefle to be appointed to commission
Send a link to a friend
[January 17, 2019]
At the end of the Lincoln City Council’s Committee of the Whole on
Tuesday evening, Alderwoman Heidi Browne asked the council to
approve a re-write of the recently passed Liquor Ordinance for the
city. She noted that the numbers reflected in the ordinance are
backward to the original intention of the recommending committee,
and was causing much concern among local businesses.
The topic of the liquor license has been a challenge for Lincoln
aldermen as they have struggled to determine how to provide a liquor
license that will also put in place some control on video gambling
within the city. The city has no say in the issuance of gaming
licenses, but they can control gaming by stipulating that the
gambling machines only be a portion of the total gross receipts of
any business holding the license.
The license for gaming is issued by the state, and only to certain
establishments such as bars, restaurants, and other qualified
businesses that serve liquor by the glass. Gaming licenses are also
offered to truck stops, but are not available to businesses that
sell package liquor only.
When the topic came up several months ago, it was because one
convenience store in Lincoln wanted to partition off a portion of
the store for gaming. To do so, the business would also have to
provide beer or alcohol by the glass and would have to be separated
from the convenience store and offer a separate entrance. The
business was going to meet all those requirements, but there was not
a liquor license available for them.
A second business wanted to build a gaming room near the interstate
and the Thornton’s truck stop, focusing mainly on gaming, that
business would also serve beer by the glass. Again there was no
license available.
The city began working on addressing the issue. Among the viable
solutions was to combine the Class B and Class C licenses into one
and expand the number of licenses available.
At the December 26th meeting of the council, Steve Parrott
introduced the recommendations of a special committee. In that
meeting, Parrott said that part of the recommendation was to drop
the 60 percent requirement to 30 percent. This was the requirement
that said each business must provide evidence that 60 percent or
more of its annual sales come from something other than gambling.
With the change it would mean that those businesses would need to
provide evidence that at least 30 percent of their annual revenues
come from something other than gaming. This could include food,
alcohol or other retail sales.
On the 26th, City Attorney John Hoblit was asked to draft the new
ordinance. He was instructed on what to draft and at that time
recommended that the city review the draft in the next committee of
the whole before placing it on a voting agenda. However, aldermen
agreed that they wanted to vote on the new ordinance as quickly as
possible, so they would do so at the January 7th voting session.
[to top of second column] |
At the January 7th voting meeting the aldermen discussed the ordinance and at
that time there appeared to be some confusion about the 30 percent requirement.
However, the ordinance was voted upon and passed with a vote of 5-2-1.
Aldermen who voted yes included Michelle Bauer, Heidi Browne, Dayne Dalpoas, Ron
Keller and Steve Parrott. Those who voted no were Jeff Hoinacki and Tracy Welch.
Ron Fleshman abstained from the vote.
This week Browne said that the ordinance had been written backward to what the
recommending committee had asked for, and that she wanted the aldermen to
instruct Hoblit to re-do the ordinance. She noted that the 30 percent was
indeed, as originally interpreted on December 26th, supposed to go toward the
percentage of sales that would come from something other than gaming.
The ordinance, as passed, implied that 30 percent or less of the
total revenue may come from gaming. The original intention was for the ordinance
to say that 30 percent or more of the total gross revenue should
come from the sale of products other than gaming.
Steve Parrott commented saying that several had read about the change to the
ordinance and had reached out saying that the 30 percent or less from gaming
would put some of the local businesses out of business. He said there was a
great deal of concern expressed over what the city had passed.
Hoblit said that he would draft a new amendment for the ordinance, but this
time, he would strongly recommend that the entire ordinance be reviewed by the
full council in a committee of the whole meeting before placing it on a voting
agenda. Aldermen agreed.
The ordinance will be amended and reviewed by aldermen at the Council’s
Committee of the Whole on January 29th and may be placed on the voting agenda
for February 4th.
After the meeting, Tracy Welch noted that the 30 percent had been stated
correctly in one portion of the ordinance document and incorrectly in another.
This added to the general confusion.
Rick Hoefle to be appointed to liquor commission
In other business related to the liquor license. Aldermen will vote on February
4th to appoint former Lincoln Alderman Rick Hoefle to the Lincoln Liquor
Commission. As a part of the new rules for the liquor license, the council
approved adding members to the commission and also paying the commissioners a
stipend of $25 per meeting attended.
[Nila Smith] |