|
Weeks after a Cook County judge ruled it unconstitutional for
the Illinois General Assembly to reject its own pay raises, a bill filed in the
Illinois House of Representatives seeks to let state lawmakers do just that.
State Rep. Maurice A. West II, D-Rockford, filed House Bill 3855 on July 19. The
bill would allow lawmakers to forgo annual cost-of-living increases granted to
the General Assembly under state law.
The money lawmakers would give up would instead go to the state’s severely
underwater pension system. The state pension systems were projected to end
fiscal year 2019 with deficits of $136.8 billion.
Lawmakers could opt out of their cost-of-living increase at any point during the
fiscal year under HB 3855. Upon opting out, the bill would require lawmakers to
repay each cost-of-living increase earned up to that point, with the state
depositing those funds into the pension systems.
Until this year, the Illinois General Assembly had voted each year since 2009 to
“freeze” its annual cost-of-living increase. And pending the outcome of a
lawsuit brought by two former lawmakers, all those nixed pay raises could still
reach lawmakers’ pockets.
On July 2, Cook County Circuit Judge Franklin Valderrama ruled the Illinois
Constitution prohibits changes to lawmaker compensation in the middle of a
lawmaker’s term. The judge has not yet ordered the state to issue back
paychecks, but has scheduled another hearing for Aug. 7.
[to top of second column] |
Former state Sen.
Michael Noland, D-Elgin, sued the state comptroller shortly after he
retired in 2017, seeking repayment for himself and all other members
of the General Assembly who passed eight bills rejecting their
annual cost-of-living raises. Noland himself voted for at least one
of those bills in 2012.
Noland’s co-plaintiff, former state Sen. James Clayborne,
D-Belleville, joined the case in 2018. He, too, voted for the 2012
pay freeze and said he was rejecting it in solidarity with
taxpayers. The judge recently removed Clayborne from the lawsuit
because Clayborne decided not to seek reelection, although he still
stands to receive the same back pay as his peers at the judge’s
direction.
If passed, West’s bill would protect taxpayers from the kind of
duplicity shown by former lawmakers Noland and Clayborne, who
advocated on behalf of taxpayers when it was politically
advantageous only to demand more of them later.
Lawmakers receive pensions from the General Assembly Retirement
System, or GARS, which costs taxpayers millions in annual payments.
It contains about 15 cents for every dollar needed to pay future
benefits, and is the worst-funded of the five state pension systems.
West’s bill would be a small but welcome step toward reducing the
GARS deficit.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article |
