Public Hearing for Whitney Hill
Wind Farm draws questions and comments
Send a link to a friend
[March 11, 2019]
On Thursday, March 7, the Zoning Board of Appeals held a public
hearing on the Whitney Hill Wind Farm project planned near Mount
Pulaski to consider whether to recommend approval of the conditional
use permit and two variance requests.
This project is the second phase of the HillTopper wind project
currently in operation.
Matt Birchby of Swift Current Energy and Kyle Barry, attorney for
the project, shared basic information about the plans. Birchby has
been working with the HillTopper project since it started, and Barry
has been the attorney for both projects.
Barry said the ZBA would be voting on three separate items, the
conditional use permit and two variance requests. One request is for
sound variance from a landowner who signed an easement waiver
allowing the company to exceed sound thresholds on that tower. The
other is an agricultural zone variance because the portion where the
wind turbine will be located is in an area zoned special district.
The Regional Planning Commission heard about the plans last month
and unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use permit.
Birchby said the HillTopper project cost $350 million and brought in
economic benefits to the county that included $787,888 in building
permit fees. Payments to participating landowners will add up to
$26.2 M over the 30-year project life.
For non-participating landowners, payments will add up to $5.7 M
with those within 3,000 feet of a turbine receiving $1,000 a year.
Birchby said from the HillTopper project, they have learned what
they can do better in terms of construction and roads. He is already
talking to the Logan County Highway Department and other road
authorities about plans for Whitney Hill.
Birchby said the Whitney Hill project will be 1.5 miles from Mount
Pulaski near Lake Fork and at the eastern end of HillTopper towards
2000th Avenue. It will cover about 4,000 acres.
Whitney Hill will use the same switchyard as HillTopper because it
allows up to 350 megawatts to be connected.
This project will be capped at 26 turbines and 65 megawatts. The
turbines will be a GE model newer than what is at HillTopper and
will be up to 499 feet at tip height and have a 2.82-megawatt
capacity. Three turbines will be about 455 feet tall.
There will also be underground collection lines, a project
substation, and access roads.
An Agricultural Impact Mitigation Agreement was executed January
2019.
Birchby said they will use HillTopper’s Operation and Management
Building in the former Bo-Jac office. Construction is anticipated to
begin May 2019.
Birchby said the Whitney Hill Project is a $100 M project and would
bring in between $236,939 and $256, 913 in permit fees to the county
and $400,000 per year in property taxes.
Participating landowners would receive $16 M in payments over the
30-year course of the project and $2.2 M would be paid to
non-participating landowners. Birchby said non-participating
landowners within 3,000 feet of a turbine would receive $1,000 a
year and there are about 45 homes within 300 feet.
The company is hoping to have an aircraft detection lighting system
that detects whether there are any aircraft in the vicinity of the
project installed for both Whitney Hill and HillTopper wind
turbines. If there are no aircraft nearby at night, it will turn FAA
lights off for at least 98 percent of nighttime hours. Birchby said
they are working to get it approved by the FAA.
The Logan County Ordinance establishes a 1,000-foot minimum setback
from any structure and Birchby said average setbacks from homes will
be 1,800 feet. Additional setbacks from other structures are 1.1
times the height of the wind turbine when sited by public roads,
transmission lines, communication towers, pipelines and pipeline
utilities, property lines of non-participating landowners. If a 499
foot tall turbine is used, the required setback would be 549 feet.
Birchby said they will follow Illinois Pollution Control Board
standards, except in the case of the sound variance, which would be
less than two decibels above the range.
After Birchby’s presentation, Barry had witnesses share results of a
sound study, wildlife studies, property value studies, and
decommissioning plans.
Jeff Long, who has worked for AWS Truepower for eleven years, has
done over a dozen project sound studies. Long did a projection of
sound levels using UL’s open wind software, looking at turbine and
receptor locations and site-specific variables like temperature and
humidity. Long said he concluded the layout would be compliant with
IPCB sound rules for both night and day hours as all turbines will
be lower than 41 decibels, aside from the one requesting a sound
variance.
Barry asked Long to explain the noise reduction operation.
Long said Noise Reduction Operation means the rotor speed of the
turbine is reduced to reduce sound output if needed.
Rebecca Schmitt, who has been doing wildlife risk and impact studies
for over 25 years, has done studies for over 15 proposed projects.
Schmitt said West, the company she works for, did surveys of the
risks to birds, bats, and other sensitive species, an avian use
survey of endangered birds like bald eagles, eagle nest survey, and
surveys of bat activity in the spring and fall. They expect low
risks for all the species.
In a wetland study, Schmitt said there were no high-quality wetland
observed. There are couple waterways, but less than 0.1 acres of
stream and wetland impacts. Schmitt consulted with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and Illinois Department of Natural Resources for
each study and both concurred with her findings.
Pete Polletti, a township assessor in Collinsville and designated
appraiser, did a real estate impact study. Poletti’s real estate
study looked at operational wind projects and sales data along with
the assumption of impact.
Polletti did property value studies in Wind Groves and Mendota Hills
to look at the impact of their wind farms on property values. He
checks a target area of homes near wind farms and a control area
with similar land and looks at home sales in both, then averages
sales numbers.
[to top of second column] |
Poletti said he found no statistical difference between homes near a wind farm
and those a distance from it, and has concluded there is no considerable impact
on sales. He does not feel there will be an impact on homes near the project.
Jay Whetmore, who has done 13 decommissioning plans and cost estimates, talked
about the decommissioning plans. Whetmore did the plan for the Whitney Hill
project and said the total costs would be $4,009,675, which includes costs to
disassemble towers, remove concrete foundations and aggregate from the
substation and payments for crop loss.
Whetmore said the structural steel from the turbine can be salvaged for almost
$2.8 M and the aluminum for about $129,657.
Whetmore said this plan conforms to HillTopper’s Logan County approved
decommissioning plan and methodology. The plan will be reviewed after ten years.
With their presentation Barry asked that the ZBA make a recommendation for
approval to the county board.
Next, members of the ZBA asked some questions.
ZBA member John Fulton asked if the tower that does not meet the noise criteria
was in reduced noise operating mode?
Long said it is a combination of sound from five turbines.
ZBA member Cheryl Baker how much the sound missed the criteria?
Birchby said it was missed by less than two decibels at nighttime. It would be a
challenge to resolve it by just noise reduction mode.
ZBA chairman Doug Thompson asked if a house on a hill not far from a tower would
hear a higher decibel level?
Long said in elevated areas, sound is not usually higher.
ZBA member Scott Noltensmeier asked about broken tiles, what they would do for
the landowners, and how long they have to fix it?
Daniel Sheehan of Swift Current Energy said with HillTopper, they compensated
one landowner for crop damage and fixed the tile. Sheehan said they schedule
repairs as quickly as possible and have 48 hours to get the repair done if water
is flowing in the tile and weather conditions permit it.
Birchby said the company is responsible for fixing the tile.
Thompson asked who fixes the tile if broken during decommissioning.
Birchy said the decommissioning security is responsible, though decommissioning
is less invasive.
Noltensmeier asked why Primm Road was in bad shape at the start of the
HillTopper project construction and how they would avoid something like that for
this project?
Birchby said the strength of the road was a problem and studies they need from
labs on the necessary cement stabilization were delayed for weeks, which caused
the road to fall into greater disrepair than it should have. The company has now
learned to do more lab tests and studies and have more interaction with road
engineers in advance of the project to have proper strengthening mix. Whitney
Hill also does not have the bottleneck Primm Road does.
The floor was then opened for public comments and several community members
expressed their concerns about health issues, noise levels, road damage, and
property damage.
Richard Camp said he has vertigo, headaches, and tinnitus and asserts that
doctors have told him what he has is consistent with living within 2,500 feet of
wind turbines. Camp asked about making setbacks 2,500 feet or more from homes to
help alleviate this problem. Camp said he is going to have to move, but another
home he owns is near turbines too, so he cannot move to his other home. Camp
asked the ZBA to consider the health and welfare of the community and deny the
zoning.
Ronald Ellis lives within 1,800 feet of towers and said he hears a lot of noise
from the turbines. He asked about whether they have done any post construction
sound studies?
Long said they have not had to reassess energy output.
Birchby said they will do more sound studies.
When asked by Noltensmeier what would happen if a turbine failed a sound test,
Birchby said if a turbine is not sound compliant, a landowner should reach out
to the operations manager and ask that it be checked. If the turbine is not
sound compliant, the company will have to make it compliant and put the turbine
in noise reduction mode.
Lori Batchelder lives close to the wind farm and said she was initially open
minded. She said her road is in horrible shape and has a huge dip and wants to
know when it will be fixed. Batchelder asked the ZBA to consider the road issues
and noise.
Sheehan said the roads are scheduled to be fixed later this month by regrading
and putting oil and chip on them. He said gravel will be added to fix the
pothole.
Kelby Ford said he was told roads would be fixed last fall and not this spring
and feels some information has been misrepresented.
Birchby said if construction and weather had allowed, the plan was to fix them
sooner.
Sandra Ellis said she is not getting advanced notice of power outages and when
email and phones are down, it affects her home business. She said there is also
devastation to property that needs to be repaired and asked the ZBA to consider
the negative impacts to properties and to their quality of life.
After the public comments ended, Thompson said due to the lateness of the hour,
they would reconvene next week to consider the requests and make their decision.
The next ZBA public hearing will be held Wednesday, March 13 at 7:30 p.m. at the
American Legion in Mount Pulaski.
[Angela Reiners] |