Fall 2018 Logan County
Farm Outlook Magazine

New developments in the pursuit of E15
By Jim Youngquist

Send a link to a friend  Share

[March 25, 2019]  According to an article published in Bloomberg on March 12, 2019, the U.S. EPA has taken the next step toward making E15 the defacto standard in gasoline additives. The EPA published its proposed rule change to lift the restrictions barring E15 from being sold year round in all U.S. markets. The mandated publication of the rule change is the legal notification prior to making the new rule law, allowing for public comment.

Alongside the EPA publication, the Trump administration changed the language of trading restrictions that refiners have to abide by to prove that they provide biofuel products, which improves the position of E15.

These two moves are the first steps in fulfilling Trump's promises to corn farmers last fall to remove restrictions preventing the proliferation of E15 in the U.S. marketplace.

Last fall we wrote that the expanded production of ethanol from E10 to E15 would help corn producers. Since that time a tariff war with China has further damaged the corn market and has caused a stockpiling of corn stocks in storage, waiting for better days.

With continued research into new hybrids and GMOs, and the expansion of corn production acreage, we have experienced incredible increases in yields, and the result is that we have more corn but not an appetite for greater consumption. The result for producers is non-sustaining lower prices.



So the greater challenge is to find new markets or expand existing markets for the consumption of corn.

In the 1970s the addition of ethanol to gasoline began because the current stabilizing additive, MTBE, was found to be contaminating groundwater. By 2005 MTBE was banned in 20 states and the norm became the addition of 10% ethanol to gasoline to raise the octane level, and provide the needed oxygenating stabilizer.

Corn prices at the time were around $2 a bushel, and with the nationwide adoption of E10 as a standard for automobile gasoline, it is estimated that ethanol production added somewhere between 75 cents to $1 a bushel to the price of corn.

The aim in 1970 was to achieve energy self-sufficiency, avoiding politically charged purchases and commitments for fuels to unstable regimes in middle-eastern countries.

Today the aims have changed. With the expansion of shale oil production in the gasoline industry we are now energy self-sufficient and are now a petroleum exporter. The aim of ethanol use now is for environmental protection and agricultural support.

Most gas stations in the U.S. sell a blend of gasoline and the 10% ethanol produced mainly from corn goes to motorists driving automobiles and light trucks. In 2011 the EPA cleared all automobiles produced after 2001 to use E10. With government subsidies, the ethanol industry grew, corn consumption grew, independent ethanol producers went out of business and sold out to big grain consortiums (like ADM and Cargill), and the farmers who grew corn were rewarded.

In an attempt to grow the ethanol industry, new ethanol blends such as E85 were produced and marketed. E85 is a blend of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline, and still exists today. Approximately 11 million E85 flex fuel vehicles have been produced since their advent in 2008 but only about one-half million of the E85 capable vehicles get fueled with E85 gasohol today for two reasons: First, the availability of E85 has been hampering E85 sales. Few gas stations were able to sell E85 because of the infrastructure changes needed to support E85; and second, drivers found that they got poor mileage from low-energy E85 compared to E10, and few continued to use E85 despite the lower price.

In March 2009, a lobbying group, Growth Energy, formally requested that the EPA allow the ethanol content in gasoline to be increased to 15% from 10% for general consumption in the United States. Their aim was for E15 to replace E10 as the automobile standard for cars and light trucks produced after 2001. Growth Energy's motivation was to expand the ethanol industry, and the result would be to expand the consumption of corn.

The EPA gave tacit approval, with the restriction that E15 only be sold from October thru May each year. Since ethanol requires great quantities of electricity to produce, the EPA wanted to limit the production of E15 to reduce the amount of carbon put into the atmosphere by coal burning power plants during the high electricity production summer season (an Obama administration environmental regulation).

[to top of second column

This seasonal restriction prevented the expansion of E15. Service station owners stayed with the old standard E10 rather than spending significant money to expand for a fuel that was only used for eight months a year. E15 was shelved except in a few markets, and is only sold in 1,300 gas stations in 29 states currently.

The major problems are insufficient infrastructure and seasonal restrictions by the EPA.

In July 2018, President Donald Trump said in a speech to Iowa farmers that he would work to lift the E15 EPA seasonal restrictions and promised E15 sales year round. The expansion from E10 to E15 would raise the consumption of corn from 40% of the current crop to approximately 55% if E15 replaced E10 nationwide according to the USDA.

The oil industry is actively fighting E15 because the expansion of ethanol would mean a reduction in the consumption of gasoline in the midst of a boom in the production of petroleum fuels in the United States. The oil industry has issued press releases and established websites listing the hazards, dangers, ecological and economic reasons not to use E15, much of which is full of innuendo, hyperbole, and outright misdirection.

In addition to the opposition from the oil industry, E15 also faces another hurdle. State governments currently provide sales tax exemptions for the ethanol portion of E10 (a savings of 20%) but there is no sales tax exemption presently for E15. Any service station replacing E10 with E15 would immediately price themselves out of the market to other stations that continued to sell E10. There is currently one service station in the state of Illinois selling E15 in the city of Rochelle.
If there are no serious political or legal challenges to the published rule change, year-long selling of E15 will be possible and removes the marketing restriction that has hindered the adoption of E15 as the gasoline biofuel standard. But further financial incentives may be necessary to move a market which is decade-long entrenched in the use of E10, as well as encouraging consumers to desire the new product despite a barrage of propaganda being circulated damaging E15's reputation. Even with no further impediments, the move to E15 will take time.

 

[Jim Youngquist]

Sources

EPA Publishes Year-Round E15 Rule

Wikipedia: "Ethanol fuel in the United States"

Fox 28: "Trump promises Iowa farmers E15 all year" by Matt Hammill July 26, 2018

Iowa State Agricultural Policy Review: "USDA's Projections for 2018"

Genesis Communications Network: "The many reasons not to buy E15 gasoline"

Chicago Tribune: "Mandating E15 gasoline is a bad idea"

Illinois News Network: "Illinois farmers cheer Trump's E15 fuel expansion plan" by Greg Bishop Oct 11, 2018 

Read all the articles in our new
2019 Spring Farm Outlook Magazine

Title
CLICK ON TITLES TO GO TO PAGES
Page
Farm Outlook Spring 2019 - Introduction 4
China's approval of Enlist E3 Soybeans added to corn givens farmers more options 7
New developments in the pursuit of E15 13
Could new anhydrous price lower N application rates? 17
New Tech:  Robots and drones to play a larger role in farm production 21
A layman's Guide to signaling with basis 28
Choosing legacy seeds in a GMO world 32
The Klockenga's:  A lineage of family farming 38

 

Back to top