Attorney General files lawsuit to
sto the EPA from weakening protections against pesticide poisoning
Send a link to a friend
[December 19, 2020]
Attorney General Kwame Raoul joined a coalition of five attorneys
general in filing a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) for illegally weakening protections for
farmworkers, their families, and others from toxic pesticides. The
lawsuit argues that the EPA violated federal law when it adopted a
regulation that allows pesticide spraying to continue even if
farmworkers or other persons are within the area immediately
surrounding the spraying equipment, if that area is outside the
farm’s boundaries.
“The EPA’s irresponsible new rule eliminates important workplace
protections and puts agricultural communities at risk by blatantly
ignoring decades of science that have proved the harmful effects of
pesticides,” Raoul said. “I am committed to continuing to fight the
EPA’s rollback of rules meant to protect workers and communities at
the heart of our essential agricultural industry.”
In 2015, for the first time in nearly 25 years, the EPA updated and
strengthened its Agricultural Worker Protection Standard regulations
to better address the adverse effects of pesticides among
agriculture workers and other communities vulnerable to exposure. As
a part of the 2015 regulation, the EPA established the Application
Exclusion Zone (AEZ), an up to 100-foot circular area around
pesticide application equipment that, because of the inherent
dangers of pesticides, must be free of all persons other than
appropriately-trained and equipped handlers during application. The
regulation also required handlers to suspend a pesticide application
if any person is within the AEZ – including if the AEZ extended
beyond the boundaries of the farm on which conducting the
application.

On Oct. 20, the EPA adopted a rule that weakened these protections
afforded to farmworkers, their families, and others from pesticide
exposure by substantially limiting the AEZ, allowing handlers to
continue applying pesticides even when farmworkers or bystanders are
present within AEZ – so long as these persons are located outside
the farm’s boundaries.
[to top of second column] |

In the lawsuit, Raoul and the coalition argues that the EPA violated the law by:
Departing from its prior recent position without adequate justification.
Failing to justify the changes to the Application Exclusion Zone.
Providing an explanation that is contrary to evidence.
Ignoring its obligation to identify and address the disproportionately high and
adverse effects of this policy change on minority and low-income populations.

The agricultural sector ranks among the most hazardous industries in the
country, with the EPA determining in 2015 that a “sizeable portion of the
agricultural workforce may be exposed occupationally to pesticides and pesticide
residues.” During the period from 1998 to 2011, there were nearly 10,000
reported cases of acute pesticide poisoning resulting from pesticide exposure at
work – although, as the EPA has acknowledged, pesticide incidents may be
underreported by up to 70 percent. Severe acute pesticide exposures can result
in seizures, respiratory depression, loss of consciousness, and death.
Many pesticide exposures, however, do not result in acute, apparent symptoms
but, when accumulated over time, can result in grave harms – such as Parkinson’s
disease, and blood, prostate, and lung cancers – occurring many years after
exposure. Pesticides, which may be transported into the home on parents’ skin,
clothing, and shoes, pose particular dangers to the children of farmworkers.
Studies have shown an association between mothers exposed to pesticides during
pregnancy and an increased risk of birth defects and fetal death, as well as
delayed mental development and development of behavior due to childhood exposure
to certain pesticides.
Raoul and the coalition ask the court to vacate the EPA’s rule and bar the
agency from implementing it.
Joining Raoul in the lawsuit are the attorneys general of California, Maryland,
Minnesota and New York.
[Office of the Illinois Attorney
General] |