| 
			 Largest solar farm planned for 
			central Logan County gets first nod 
			 
			 
            Send a link to a friend 
            
 
			
			
			 [June 10, 2020] 
             
			 
			
			 
			On June 4, the Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing via 
			Zoom to consider a Conditional Use Permit for a Solar Farm. The 
			application made by Apex / Mulligan is Logan County's largest solar 
			farm request to date. 
			 
			Those who shared information about the project included attorney for 
			the project Kyle Barry and project manager Erin Baker.  
			 
			Experts on the topics of solar glare, property values and 
			decommissioning included Rick Coles from Capital Airspace, Mike 
			MaRous of MaRous and Company and engineer Jay Whetmore of Westwood 
			Professional Services. The experts joined via phone conferencing. 
			Jeff Newcome director of project management and Senior Advisor of 
			APEX and Logan County Zoning Officer Would D’Andrea were also 
			available to answer questions. 
			 
			ZBA members present were Cheryl Baker, Bret Farmer, John Fulton, 
			Judi Graff, Derek Martin and Chairman Doug Thompson. Scott 
			Noltensmeier was absent.  
			 
			Though this is the first solar farm Barry has represented in Logan 
			County, Barry has represented wind farm projects in the county.  
			 
			Barry said Mulligan's application is for a solar energy system that 
			would generate up to 70 megawatts (“MW”) across 874 acres of 
			participating parcels. The Project would interconnect to the 
			existing Ameren Fogarty 138 kV substation, which is located 
			northeast of the town of Broadwell. The interconnection facilities, 
			or “Project Substation,” would be located with the Fogarty 
			substation on an adjacent parcel.  
			 
			The solar farm would be located in central Logan County 
			approximately three miles south of Lincoln, roughly bounded by 
			1300th Street to the north, Salt Creek to the east, 1100th street to 
			the south, and 800th Avenue to the west in Broadwell Township. All 
			property within the project boundary is zoned Agricultural and on 
			property classified as either Farmland or Farmland - Buildings.  
			 
			Mulligan Solar, LLC is owned by Apex Clean Energy, LLC, an 
			independent renewable energy company based in Charlottesville, 
			Virginia, focused on building utility-scale generation facilities. 
			Apex was founded in 2009, by Greenlight Energy Resources Inc. (GER), 
			a company formed in 2006 to invest in the renewable energy sector. 
			GER’s founder has created five companies in the wind, solar, wave, 
			and biofuel energy sectors, including Greenlight Energy and Axio 
			Power. Since then, Apex has become one of the leading renewable 
			development companies in the industry. 
			
			
			  
			
			 
			 
			Apex has completed construction of 13 wind and solar facilities for 
			a total of nearly three gigawatts of new renewable generation. These 
			projects represent total capital investment of more than $7 billion. 
			Apex also completed development of the Sugar Creek Wind Project, 
			currently under construction in Logan County in collaboration with 
			American Wind Energy Management. Operating assets under management 
			have grown to 1.6 GW. 
			 
			Barry said the application is submitted in accordance with Appendix 
			F: Solar Farms and Solar Gardens of the Logan County Zoning 
			Ordinance, the purpose of which is to facilitate the construction, 
			installation, operation, and decommissioning of solar farms and 
			solar gardens.  
			 
			Apex’s Erin Baker works strictly with renewable energies. She has 
			worked with Sugar Creek and Hoopeston Wind Farm projects. Baker also 
			worked on a wind and solar project in Fort Hood, Texas for the 
			Department of Defense, which is their largest project so far.  
			 
			As the supply chain and solar technology improved, costs have gone 
			down dramatically. Baker said that makes it more competitive. The 
			solar generation curve more closely matches the load curve utilities 
			would be looking for. Wind is not always blowing at the time people 
			are using electricity, and solar matches energy peaks better.  
			 
			The change of land use for solar turns a property into conservation 
			easement. Solar projects have little infrastructure aside from the 
			pilings with the panels that would be removed at the end of their 
			use. Baker said it is a temporary use that can help prevent urban 
			sprawl. It effectively allows the land to rest and later be put back 
			to its original use.  
			 
			Agreements have been signed with landowners for 874 acres. Baker 
			said because of setbacks, not all acreage would have solar panels on 
			them.  
			 
			Sometime at the beginning of next year, Baker said they expect to 
			have a generator interconnection agreement with Ameren. At that 
			time, construction is planned to begin and when completed would 
			represent a nearly $100 million capital investment in Logan County. 
			 
			Baker said benefits include a contribution to the local economy 
			through property taxes and revenue to landowners. Schools could come 
			visit the project. During construction, there would be creation of 
			125-200 temporary jobs with staffing by local people and one to two 
			full time operation and maintenance jobs.  
			 
			In addition, the project does not require utility infrastructure to 
			be directed to the project.  
			Building permit fees for the county would be just over $200,000.  
			
			
			  
			
			 
			 
			Baker said the application has been structured to ensure it complies 
			with the county ordinance for solar. In one appendix to the 
			application, they included a checklist of where each of the 
			requirements can be found in the ordinance.  
			 
			The project is designed to meet or exceed all setbacks. These 
			setbacks include for non-participating residences, non-participating 
			property lines, public right-of-ways and ordinary high-water mark of 
			any body of water. Baker said one residence deviates from the 
			500-foot setback for non-participating residences because that 
			landowner has signed a waiver.  
			 
			A drainage plan is included in the application and Baker said the 
			existing drainage of the project area would be preserved. Once the 
			design is completed, Apex would need to get storm water permitting 
			from the county to ensure there is no negative impact on drainage 
			during construction or operation. 
			 
			The project design would meet all sound requirements of the 
			pollution control board. When the sun is not shining, the solar 
			project is not operating and the inverters are not running at night, 
			there would be no noise at night from the project. Baker said even 
			during the day when the project is operating, the only equipment 
			that would make noise are the inverter boxes. The inverters generate 
			the decibels comparable to normal conversation levels.  
			 
			Even if sold to a future buyer, Baker said Apex would still operate 
			the project.  
			 
			Next, each of the experts spoke. 
			 
			Rick Coles of Capital Airspace spoke about his solar glare analysis. 
			Coles has been doing solar glare analysis since 2014 and has 
			prepared 80 glint and glare analyses. The company he works for has 
			filed 55,000 cases with the Federal Aviation Administration. They 
			have also done over 1,500 obstacle evaluations to help determine no 
			hazards.  
			 
			In October 2013, the FAA developed a policy to enhance safety by 
			providing standards for measuring ocular impact of proposed solar 
			energy systems and air traffic controllers.  
			 
			Standards for a solar glare hazard analysis tool (SGHAT) have been 
			developed by the FAA. As part of the SGHAT and working with the FAA, 
			there should be no glare in air traffic control towers. The tool 
			looks at inputs such as the angles of the solar array. Coles said 
			green glare in the cockpit of aircraft and cars is allowed.  
			 
			Glare is measured as green, yellow or red. Green is low or 
			temporary, yellow is potential afterimage and not allowed anywhere 
			and red has potential for permanent eye damage. Coles has just seen 
			green and yellow glare and has not been able to create red glare.
			 
			 
			Looking at Logan County Airport and three others nearby, Coles 
			predicts no glare for any runway approach. 
			 
			Barry asked if the analysis was sufficient for the FAA and whether 
			the FAA issued a determination of no hazards. 
			 
			Coles said, yes, they issued it in March, 2020.  
			 
			Coles also analyzed roads near the project, looking at the north and 
			south bound lanes on I-55. He found no glare predicted. 
			 
			Coles overall analysis showed no predicted glare for runways, roads 
			or residences.  
			 
			Barry then asked if the project would comply with the Logan County 
			Zoning Ordinance sections on aviation protection and on glare. 
			 
			Coles said the project complies with both sections. 
			 
			A property value impact study was done my Mike MaRous, who has a 
			real estate appraisal firm. MaRous was awarded the MIA designation, 
			which is the real estate appraisal designation. He has appraised 
			over 12,000 properties and done many impact studies for wind and 
			solar projects.  
			 
			In April, MaRous published his property values market impact study 
			for the Mulligan Solar Project that included demographics and the 
			general character of the area.  
			 
			MaRous also analyzed public safety and impacts - appearance, 
			environmental sustainability, noise, odor, traffic, hazardous 
			materials and public services. He compared similar areas and 
			provided examples from Illinois and other Midwestern states - 
			Indiana, Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota.  
			 
			MaRous concluded the project would be integrated into the fabric of 
			the agricultural community with no negative impact on property 
			values. The only solar study peer reviewed by experts and professors 
			showed assessors who had solar in their towns found positive rather 
			than negative impacts.  
			 
			Engineer Jay Whetmore, an engineer for almost 40 years with fourteen 
			solar decommissioning plans in Illinois under his belt, prepared 
			that plan.  
			
			
			[to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
Financial assurance was reviewed to see that it reflects current prices and 
conditions. Whetmore said one challenge in reviewing finances for solar 
decommissioning, there is no record of solar costs. In considering finances, 
Whitmore looked at how to dispose of the non-recyclable parts of the project. 
			 
Whetmore looked at around 100 line items including project management, removing 
civil infrastructure such as access roads, and removing the aggregate path to 
the substation. Other items removed would be electrical infrastructure, solar 
panels, cables, arrays and steel foundation piles. Salvage values are also 
reviewed. He said when decommissioning the project, land must be restored to its 
pre-installation conditions.  
 
Estimated costs would be $6.2 million and the salvage value would be $7.2 M. 
Whetmore said salvage costs would earn more than construction costs if the 
project is decommissioned in five years. 
 
After looking at all these areas, Whetmore concluded the decommissioning plan 
meets all the ordinance requirements for Logan County. 
  
After the experts finished sharing their results, Barry said he believed the 
application materials satisfy conditional use requirements. 
 
ZBA members then had a few questions about some of the potential impacts. 
Derek Martin asked about impacts on property values since most of the residences 
here would be within a mile or mile-and-a-half of the project, a closer than 
norm proximity. He also had questions about field tile issues, property upkeep 
and what would be between panel rows. 
 
MaRous said earlier projects had more nominal setbacks than they do now. Once 
you get to a mile, especially with cornfields near, some arrays are not even 
visible. 
 
As for upkeep, Baker said the company is contractually obligated to preserve 
drainage and fix tiles when needed. Barry said the Agricultural Impact 
Mitigation Agreement provides more protection for tiles and reroutes them around 
the project if needed so it would not disrupt drainage. 
 
Baker said native grasses and vegetation would be planted under the panels.  
 
ZBA chairman Doug Thompson asked whether the panel movement affects glare 
potential.  
 
Coles said the panels point directly at the sun with 60 to 120 degrees east or 
west of rotation. The angle reduces the glare, and most glare would be at 
sunrise or sunset.  
 
ZBA member John Fulton asked about rainfall runoff. 
 
Newcome said runoff is minimal. They did a hydrology study of natural water flow 
across the area they are developing. He said glass on the panels sheds the 
rainfall.  
 
Martin asked whether there is any training for EMA regarding solar farms. 
 
Newcome said the company routinely works with local fire departments and other 
agencies doing training on emergency procedures before, during and after 
construction. The company would invite crews on site to see how the site is 
operated and possible hazards.  
 
Another question was about decommissioning and recycling and whether the company 
could come up with financial surety if the panels become worthless.  
 
At 90 percent resale value, Whetmore said, panels have great economic value. 
Materials such as aluminum and silicone can be recycled, but it is not 
economical to recycle the panels.
			 
  
 
 
Baker said the decommissioning plan would be periodically reviewed and could be 
updated to address changes in market values. Whoever owns and maintains the 
project would be highly capitalized, so Baker said it is highly unlikely they 
could not cover costs. Depreciation cannot go below 30 percent of the original 
assessed value of the project.  
 
The assessed value of solar is $218,000 per megawatt. Barry said if you multiply 
that by 70, that is a lot of assessed value for the starting point.  
 
Thompson asked what ongoing jobs there might be once the project is completed 
since some solar farms are controlled remotely. 
 
Newcome said the facility would be remotely operated, but there would be two 
local full-time personnel to manage the day-by-day maintenance required.  
 
Logan County Highway Engineer Bret Aukamp asked about the access roads, where 
traffic would be coming from, coordination with Broadwell Township and any 
oversized loads they would be bringing in. 
 
For the control house structure main power transformer, Newcome said there would 
be some overweight loads. The racks would be on semis and meet load requirements 
for delivery traffic. They would use thicker gravel to support the loads.  
 
Once the public hearing part was completed, ZBA members discussed whether the 
application satisfied the conditional use requirements looking at several 
different areas. 
 
One conditional use consideration is whether the establishment or maintenance of 
the solar farm would be detrimental to public health and safety, morale or 
general welfare.  
 
Thompson said it seems environmentally friendly. 
 
The ZBA then considered whether the use would impede the development of property 
or diminish property values.  
 
Baker said not having anyone there to voice complaints seems to indicate people 
are okay with having the project come into their neighborhood.  
 
Graff said she noted that setbacks meet requirements and there is no market 
evidence supporting negative impacts on property values.  
 
Another consideration is whether adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and 
necessary facilities have been or would be provided.  
 
For compliance, the ZBA said the company needs to work with the county highway 
engineer and local road districts. Road Use agreements with the county would be 
negotiated.  
 
The ZBA also looked at whether adequate measure have been taken for egress and 
ingress points to minimize traffic congestion in public streets.  
 
Thompson had a question whether each property has access points.  
 
Newcome said he believes all landowners are separated by a public road and have 
access points from the main road.  
 
Finally, the ZBA reviewed a list of 21 items to see if these conditions would be 
met. These include documentation to show compliance with electrical ratings and 
standards, a final drainage plan stamped by a professional engineer, an 
interconnection agreement and receipt of EPA NPDES Permit for Storm water 
control and Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan.  
 
The applicant would need to provide documentation showing panels and fencing 
comply with required setbacks. To show authorizations, additional documentation 
would be needed from the FAA, professional engineers, IDOT and the railroads, 
property owners, a Tetra Tech Survey and an Illinois State Historic Preservation 
Office letter. In addition, financial resources would need to be posted.
			 
  
The County Board approval of drainage tile and repair plan, and the 
decommissioning plan would be needed. 
 
Township Access Permit and Right-of-Way Permit for access roads and utility 
crossings must be signed by the Township Road Commissioner and signed and 
recorded copies of all Road Use Agreements submitted. 
 
If applicable, township road commissioner and county engineer approval of 
roadway plans for all affected roadways, along with appropriate easements from 
property owners where the roadway improvements would occur outside of the 
existing public right-of-way, would need to be received.  
 
Posting of financial assurance for roadway plans and improvement may be needed.
 
 
Construction activity shall be limited to the hours from sunrise to sunset. 
 
If building permits for the project have not been issued within five (5) years 
of the date of Conditional Use approval, the approval shall expire and a new 
Conditional Use application would be required. 
 
The applicant shall repair any existing waterways, important for farm drainage 
and soil erosion control, that might be damaged during the construction or 
maintenance of the project and avoid adversely affecting compliance with 
existing State and Federal contracts that might apply to those waterways. 
 
D'Andrea said these conditions would need to be met before final approval of the 
conditional use permit.  
 
ZBA member Cheryl Baker then motioned to approve the solar project with the 
conditions listed.  
 
The solar project was approved 5-1. 
 
Baker, Farmer, Fulton, Graff and Thompson voted yes. 
 
Martin voted no.  
 
Their recommendation would be brought forward at the Logan County Board Workshop 
on Thursday, June 11. 
 
[Angela Reiners]  |