Chicken debate continues in
Send a link to a friend
[June 25, 2020]
Tuesday evening the debate over whether or not to permit chickens to
be raised within the city limits of Lincoln continued in the council
Alderman Kevin Bateman is still going to be a hard “no” when the
item eventually comes to a vote. Sam Downs also has some concerns
about permitting chickens, while Ron Keller continues to be an
advocate of the egg layers. Other aldermen appear to be somewhat in
favor, but not as passionate on the subject as Keller and Bateman.
All those on both sides of the fence offered solid arguments pro and
con. At the end of the lengthy discussion, the item was carried over
to the next Lincoln Committee of the Whole, which will be July 15th.
Attorney John Hoblit was given some direction on adjusting the
initial draft of a new ordinance and discussions will continue.
Early in the evening during the public participation portion of the
night, Jonathan Cox called in to voice his objection to making
chicken owners purchase a permit. He offered up two arguments. He
said first, that no one has to purchase a permit to have a cat or
other pet and many who own chickens will consider them to be pets.
He said it wasn’t right for one pet to be restricted while another
isn’t. Then, he said that no one had required there be a permit for
horses in the city, yet we have them and no one seems to be bothered
Kathy Horn and Jeff Hoinacki are the only two aldermen on the city
council who were holding office when the horse issue came before the
council. She spoke up and said that there were permits involved with
the horses and that there had also been some very specific and
strict guidelines written in order to accommodate the animals.
Treasurer Chuck Conzo agreed saying that the horse ordinances were
written to allow horses where acreage was available. He said the
ordinance had been written specifically so that no one could have a
horse living in their back yard.
With city council meetings still closed due to coronavirus, Lincoln
Zoning Officer Wes Woodhall was on teleconference and spoke up about
the horses also. He said that the horse owners do not pay an animal
permit. The permit for horses was written as a special use permit
for the land. The topic of horses had also gone to the planning
commission and the allowances and restrictions for owning horses had
been very carefully considered prior to the motions coming to the
When the chicken topic came up on the agenda later in the evening,
Bateman was the first to speak. He said that he would continue to
oppose allowing chickens. He said that since the last meeting he had
spoken with the Logan County Department of Public Health and that
organization is also very concerned about this proposal. They spoke
to Bateman about disease, rodents, and sanitation and said that
chickens were not a good idea within our city limits.
Bateman said that he also still had concerns about the coyotes that
roam the city and also said that feral cats will target the birds as
Bateman said that he had spoken with animal control and they are not
equipped to address issues with roaming chickens. He said that they
have no means to capture or even house the chickens in impoundment
after they are captured.
Batemans added that within one day of the conversations at the last
city council meeting, a chicken was noted to be roaming the streets
of the city. He said that issuing permits for the animals would not
work the way the council thinks because for every one person who
follows the rules and does things right there will be 10 who don’t.
He noted that it is the same with dogs in the county. Tags are
required, but a lot of people just don’t bother.
Finally, he said that with no enforcement from the animal control,
the burden would fall on Woodhall and his staff and the police
department. Bateman said right now there is a home in Lincoln where
the owner has more than 100 cats. There are un-kempt properties and
numerous other issues Woodhall and his small staff have to address
daily. They are already overtaxed and chickens would just add to
Keller said that since the last meeting he had contacted various
other cities that do permit chickens. He spoke specifically about
Decatur, Jacksonville and Highland Park. Those three city managers
told Keller that there were absolutely no problems that had come up
with chickens in their cities. Keller said he had asked about noise
and was told that chickens were not noisy. The dogs in those cities
were much more of an issue than the chickens.
Steve Parrott asked how homeowners were to deal with waste from the
chickens. Keller said he had asked that question also and was told
that in the other towns, homeowners can scoop their waste into
garbage bags and send it off with their weekly trash collection.
[to top of second column]
Woodhall said he had also spoken to a different person in Jacksonville who
echoed the same things Keller had been told. The chickens were not an issue in
that town. That person had told Woodhall that in the three to four years this
has been a practice in Jacksonville, the singular issue for the city had
involved a rooster, not a hen.
Discussions continued touching on the topics of use of a side yard for the
chickens, property setbacks, no permitting for butchering and no permitting of
“walking” chickens in public areas such as down the street.
It was also recommended that coops should be covered shelters to reduce invasion
of predator animals. The “free range” area for chickens outside the coop should
Then came the discussion on control. Bateman said that if there was going to be
rules and permits there also needed to be fines for violation of the rules. At
the same time, he said that day in and day out, the animal control impounds dogs
and the owners never come to pay the fines. They “just go get another dog.”
Bateman said the same thing will happen here. People will not claim the chicken;
they will just go buy another.
Then came the issue of how to handle an impounded chicken. Tracy Welch said that
he felt like the best solution would be to find a local farm that would take the
chicken off the city’s hands.
Downs somewhat misinterpreted Welch’s remark thinking that the city was going to
just take the bird to the country and dump it out. He said that would be cruel
and irresponsible. Welch clarified his suggestion saying he meant to give the
bird to someone in the country who would take it. He said he didn’t feel that
would be cruel because surely a chicken would be happier out in the country
roaming freely than living in town in limited space. Downs said Welch couldn’t
know that. Perhaps the chicken was happy living in town and didn’t want to go to
Going back to who claims the chicken, the council talked about how they could
identify a roaming chicken if caught. It was suggested that the permit for the
chickens could be issued with leg bands that had to be put on each bird. The
band would then verify who the bird belonged to if caught.
Throughout the evening there had been talks about disease and sanitation.
Bateman had latched on to the birds being disease carriers that would pass their
illnesses on to humans while Keller said that it didn’t happen all that often.
One portion of the current draft states that the chicken coop must be set back
at least 12 feet from the primary dwelling.
Treasurer Chuck Conzo asked why that was part of the rules. He said that for
some homeowners getting a confinement 12 feet from the home, ten feet from a
property line and 30 feet from a neighbor, as the draft is currently written,
would be almost impossible.
Woodhall said he had recommended those setbacks based on current regulations for
“accessory structures” in the city. He said that said structures were to be
separated from the dwelling to help protect the dwelling from loss, and that,
yes, there were also some health, safety and sanitation considerations as well.
Bateman then said that it sounded like the building needed to be separated from
the dwelling to help protect residents from health issues. He said it can’t be
both ways. Do chickens cause health issues or don’t they?
Downs said that he too had made a few calls, and had talked to a local
veterinarian who had told him that the risks of owning chickens far outweighs
the reward. Downs noted salmonella and Avian Flu as “just two” of the sicknesses
that pass from the chicken to humans.
Keller brought much of the discussion to a close when he said, “there are risks
to getting up in the morning.” He added that he felt the discussions now were
being based on ‘unwarranted fears” and that the entire topic was being ‘over
However, in the end, aldermen did agree they were not ready to vote on the
topic. There are still questions about enforcement of code, fees and fines and a
few other items that need to be worked out.
City attorney John Hoblit was asked to continue working on some of these issues
and amending the draft accordingly.
The topic will come back before the council at the next Committee of the Whole
on July 15th.