|
 Below is the scientific and public health argument behind the
British approach.
WHERE IS THE UK?
The United Kingdom is about four weeks behind Italy and other
European countries. Between 5,000 and 10,000 people are believed by
scientists to be infected in the United Kingdom. As of 0900 GMT on
March 12, the United Kingdom had tested 29,764 people. It had 590
confirmed cases and 10 people have died.
DELAY AND REDUCE THE PEAK
"What you want to do is protect people in the most infectious
period," said Patrick Vallance, the British government's chief
scientific adviser.
Britain wants to "delay the peak and to push the peak down", he
said, to prevent the National Health Service from being overwhelmed
and to push the peak into the summer months when the health service
is less burdened.
Scientific and medical experts say they are adopting a "staged"
approach, not bringing in more stringent measures until the
infection rate increases "significantly", which may not happen until
a "few weeks" from now.
They say the science of the virus is "broadly agreed"
internationally but countries will take different measures to tackle
the spread.
TIMING IS CRUCIAL
There is no point isolating the population at such an early stage as
too few are infected, people get fed up with staying at home and a
prolonged period of isolation could result in loneliness, the
scientists say.
Closing schools is not logical at this point as they would have to
stay closed for 13-16 weeks, many children would resist being
isolated for so long and parents, including those working in the
National Health Service, would be forced out of the workplace.
In essence, isolation will be needed but not yet.
"We do need to do it at the last point it is reasonable so that
people maintain their energy and enthusiasm to get through what will
be quite difficult things to do," said Chris Whitty, England's Chief
Medical Officer.
[to top of second column] |
Isolating the entire elderly population so early is not logical, according to
the government's scientific advisers.
"Asking elderly people to stay at home - that is one thing that you really have
to time... so that it coincides with the period at which the epidemic is at its
peak," Johnson said. "That is one of the reasons we are not triggering that
draconian measure now."
NO WHIPLASH
Isolating the population would suppress the virus temporarily but it would then
release it back into population and the entire health crisis would be repeated.
"If you completely locked down absolutely everything probably for a period of
four months or more then you would suppress this virus," Vallance said. "All of
the evidence from pervious epidemics suggests that when you do that and then you
release it, it all comes back again."
PROTECT THE VULNERABLE
The disease has five days of mild viral illness, when sufferers could be very
infectious, and then a small proportion of people have a second phase in which
they have some sort of immune response which causes the damage. The elderly and
sick are the ones in the gravest danger.
HERD IMMUNITY
The British scientists do not believe the virus can be eradicated at this stage
and that it will return.
"We think this virus is likely to be one that comes back year on year and
becomes like a seasonal virus and communities will become immune to it and
that's going to be an important part of controlling this longer term," Vallance
said. "60% is the sort of figure you need to get herd immunity."
(Reporting by Guy Faulconbridge; Editing by Nick Macfie)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |
