| 
		 
		Op-Ed: Lawmakers should say 'no' to 
		subsidies for Exelon nuclear plants 
		[The Center Square] Michael Patrick 
		Flanagan As federal lawmakers deliberate over President Joe 
		Biden’s $1 trillion plan to beef up American infrastructure, few might 
		have noticed that the current plan also includes a $6 billion credit 
		line for nuclear plants. Americans of all stripes should be concerned 
		that some of these funds in this credit line could go to prop up 
		profitable nuclear plants that don’t appear to need help. Such a question hits hard 
		in Illinois. Recently, the Illinois state legislature approved a bill 
		that offers nearly $700 million in subsidies to Exelon for its Byron and 
		Dresden nuclear plants and Gov. J.B. Pritzker ultimately signed the 
		legislation into law. The problem? Not only have independent analyses 
		shown the nuclear plants to be profitable, Exelon is also under intense 
		legal scrutiny for corruption. Why would lawmakers on any level even 
		consider rewarding the company with subsidies? | 
        
            | 
 For starters, the two nuclear plants Exelon claims are struggling – Byron and 
Dresden – are actually operating at a profit. In fact, the Independent Market 
Monitor verified the profitability of the plants, finding that Byron is 
operating at a budget surplus of $77.5 million without subsidies and Dresden is 
operating at an annual budget surplus of $83.7 million also excluding subsidies. 
The Electric Power Supply Association, in fact, testified to the profitability 
of these plants in June of this year before the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural 
Resources Committee. What’s more, the Independent Market Monitor for PJM, the 
power grid operator for the area including parts of Illinois, has stated that 
not a single nuclear plant on the PJM system is at risk of retirement. 
 The fact that these plants don’t need public subsidies isn’t a matter of 
opinion, but fact. This point was driven home earlier this year by Illinois 
State Senate President Don Harmon, who pointed to independent economic analysis 
that found Exelon’s plants were economically viable and didn’t need public 
welfare to survive. “Independent market monitors believe these plants can be 
profitable,” Harmon said in a statement, directly contradicting the narrative 
Exelon has repeatedly foisted on lawmakers and the public.
 
 Second, consider Exelon’s recent track record. The company was fined $200 
million last year over bribery and corruption charges and is currently under a 
deferred prosecution agreement with the federal government. As if that weren’t 
enough of a stain on the company’s character, Illinois regulators are in the 
process of investigating whether Commonwealth Edison (ComEd) – a subsidiary of 
Exelon – charged its customers for any costs associated with this bribery 
scandal. The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) voted unanimously to launch the 
investigation following a staff report that recommended looking into whether 
ComEd saddled customers with costs “not properly recoverable.”
 
 
[to top of second column] | 
 These actions reveal at least one instance of 
			proven corruption and potentially a scheme to make customers pay for 
			the bribery scandal. Should federal or state officials really hand 
			more public dollars to Exelon? Exelon thinks so, which is why the 
			company was seeking a bailout at the state level in Illinois and 
			worked feverishly to gather allies at the local level to give its 
			cause a homegrown flavor. 
			
			 Exelon’s poor-mouthing might fool some, but the company’s story 
			simply doesn’t hold up to the light of truth. Its nuclear plants 
			aren’t struggling to stay alive. They’re profitable and independent 
			analysis shows it. Those plants don’t need $6 billion in new federal 
			subsidies or this bailout at the state level funded by the 
			hardworking families and businesses of Illinois.
 Even if the plants did need financial assistance, should lawmakers 
			really hand over vast sums of public dollars to a company that has 
			engaged chronically in crony capitalism and corruption and which is 
			now under a deferred prosecution agreement with the federal 
			government? Of course not
 
 It's disheartening to see our state handing away hundreds of 
			millions in taxpayer money to a known dubious actor and to see our 
			federal lawmakers considering to follow suit. Many Illinoisans are 
			infuriated over the giveaway of their tax dollars to energy plants 
			already flush with cash, and rightfully so. Both the lawmakers and 
			Exelon should be held accountable for this shakedown.
 
 Michael Patrick Flanagan is a former U.S. Congressman 
			who represented Illinois’ 5th District.
 |