| 
              
                
				 The rise in the overall measure of agricultural producer 
				sentiment was driven by increases in both the Index of Current 
				Conditions, which rose 9 points to 118, and the Index of Future 
				Expectations, which climbed 16 points to 116. The Ag Economy 
				Barometer is calculated each month from 400 U.S. agricultural 
				producers’ responses to a telephone survey. This month’s survey 
				was conducted Aug. 15-19, after The U.S. Department of 
				Agriculture released both the August Crop Production and World 
				Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates reports. 
 “Producers in the August survey were less worried about their 
				farm’s financial situation than in July, although they remain 
				concerned about a possible cost/price squeeze,” said James 
				Mintert, the barometer’s principal investigator and director of 
				Purdue University’s Center for Commercial Agriculture.
 
 This month, more producers indicated they’re expecting better 
				financial performance for their farms in 2022 and the upcoming 
				year, as the Farm Financial Performance Index improved 11 points 
				to a reading of 99. Both corn and soybean prices rallied from 
				their July lows into mid-August which, along with expectations 
				for good yields, helped explain some of the improvement in 
				financial performance expectations.
 
 
              
                
				 
              
				At the same time, there continues to be a tremendous amount of 
				uncertainty among producers regarding the future cost of items 
				they purchase both for their farms and family usage. When asked 
				about their biggest concerns for the next year, over half (53%) 
				of respondents chose higher input costs, followed by rising 
				interest rates (14%), input availability (12%), and lower output 
				prices (11%). On the farm level, there is a big disparity in 
				opinions among farmers regarding whether input prices will 
				retreat or escalate in 2023. Approximately four out of 10 
				producers expect crop input prices in 2023 to be either 
				unchanged or possibly decline by as much as 10%, compared to 
				2022. On the other hand, just over half of all producers expect 
				input prices to rise from 1% to 20%. At the consumer level, 
				nearly half (48%) of respondents said they expect the rate of 
				inflation for consumer items during the next 12 months to be in 
				the 0% to 6% range. Compared to previous barometer surveys, more 
				producers this month said they expect inflation to be in the 
				upper end of that range than those who felt that way earlier 
				this year.
 
 Producers continue to view now as a bad time to make large farm 
				machinery and building investments. In a follow-up question, 
				nearly half (49%) of those who said it is a bad time for 
				investing cited increasing prices as the primary reason. The 
				Farm Capital Investment Index remains near its record low, but 
				was up 3 points to a reading of 39 in August.
 
 Upward pressure on cash rental rates for Corn Belt farmland in 
				2023 seems likely. Four out of 10 corn and soybean producers 
				expect farmland cash rental rates to rise in 2023 compared to 
				2022. This month, 27% of respondents said they expect rates to 
				rise up to 5% compared to 39% of respondents who expect rates to 
				rise between 5% and 10% in 2023.
 
              
                
				 
              
				Expectations for both short- and long-term farmland values were 
				nearly unchanged over the previous month. Among survey 
				respondents who say they expect farmland values to rise over the 
				next five years, well over half (57%) chose nonfarm investor 
				demand as the main reason they expect values to rise. 
              
                To understand producers’ exposure to and 
				experiences with companies offering payments for capturing 
				carbon, this month’s survey asked respondents if they’ve engaged 
				in these types of discussions and the payments being offered. In 
				August, 9% of respondents said they have engaged in discussions 
				with companies offering payments for carbon capture, the highest 
				percentage of respondents since the question was first included 
				in the survey. Of those who engaged in discussions, 75% said the 
				payment rate per metric ton of carbon offered was less than $20, 
				and just 1% said they have signed a carbon contract. Respondents 
				who engaged in discussions and chose not to sign a contract were 
				asked the minimum payment per acre they would accept to enroll 
				their farm in a carbon capture program.  
              
				[to top of second column] | 
              
 
			Two-thirds of those respondents said the payment rate 
			needed to be at least $30 per acre, suggesting that payment rates 
			need to rise to encourage more participation in carbon capture 
			programs.
 Read the full Ag Economy Barometer report. The site also offers 
			additional resources – such as past reports, charts and survey 
			methodology – and a form to sign up for monthly barometer email 
			updates and webinars.
 
 Each month, the Purdue Center for Commercial Agriculture provides a 
			short video analysis of the barometer results. For even more 
			information, check out the Purdue Commercial AgCast podcast. It 
			includes a detailed breakdown of each month’s barometer, in addition 
			to a discussion of recent agricultural news that affects farmers.
 
 The Ag Economy Barometer, Index of Current Conditions and Index of 
			Future Expectations are available on the Bloomberg Terminal under 
			the following ticker symbols: AGECBARO, AGECCURC and AGECFTEX.
 
 About the Purdue University Center for Commercial Agriculture
 
 The Center for Commercial Agriculture was founded in 2011 to provide 
			professional development and educational programs for farmers. 
			Housed within Purdue University’s Department of Agricultural 
			Economics, the center’s faculty and staff develop and execute 
			research and educational programs that address the different needs 
			of managing in today’s business environment.
 
 
			
			 
			
			About CME Group
 
 As the world’s leading and most diverse derivatives marketplace, CME 
			Group (www.cmegroup.com) enables clients to trade futures, options, 
			cash and OTC markets, optimize portfolios, and analyze data – 
			empowering market participants worldwide to efficiently manage risk 
			and capture opportunities. CME Group exchanges offer the widest 
			range of global benchmark products across all major asset classes 
			based on interest rates, equity indexes, foreign exchange, energy, 
			agricultural products and metals. The company offers futures and 
			options on futures trading through the CME Globex® platform, fixed 
			income trading via BrokerTec and foreign exchange trading on the EBS 
			platform. In addition, it operates one of the world’s leading 
			central counterparty clearing providers, CME Clearing. With a range 
			of pre- and post-trade products and services underpinning the entire 
			lifecycle of a trade, CME Group also offers optimization and 
			reconciliation services through TriOptima, and trade processing 
			services through Traiana.
 
 CME Group, the Globe logo, CME, Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Globex, 
			and E-mini are trademarks of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. CBOT 
			and Chicago Board of Trade are trademarks of Board of Trade of the 
			City of Chicago, Inc. NYMEX, New York Mercantile Exchange and 
			ClearPort are trademarks of New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. COMEX 
			is a trademark of Commodity Exchange, Inc. BrokerTec, EBS, TriOptima, 
			and Traiana are trademarks of BrokerTec Europe LTD, EBS Group LTD, 
			TriOptima AB, and Traiana, Inc., respectively. Dow Jones, Dow Jones 
			Industrial Average, S&P 500, and S&P are service and/or trademarks 
			of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, Standard & Poor’s Financial 
			Services LLC and S&P/Dow Jones Indices LLC, as the case may be, and 
			have been licensed for use by Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. All 
			other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
 
			[Writer: Kami GoodwinSource: James Mintert]
 
			
			 |