Hundreds turn out for the CoGFA
Public Hearing regarding Logan Correctional Center
- Large Rally begins at the Logan County
Courthouse and marches to the hearing
- Promised CoGFA vote on Friday does not happen
Send a link to a friend
[June 14, 2024]
On
Thursday, June 13th, there was a public hearing regarding the
closure, demolition, and rebuilding of the Logan Correctional Center
(Logan CC) in Lincoln. The hearing was preceded by a rally held
outside the Logan County courthouse on Lincoln’s square. Many
attended the rally wearing green shirts that sported the slogan
“Logan CC belongs in Logan County.” Shirts were being distributed
from the back of a truck and people were handing out other signs
with a similar message.
The rally began at 4 p.m. Everyone on the Courthouse
grounds was ushered into one central area for photos. They then
practiced their chant: “What do we want? Logan CC! Where do we want
it? Logan County!”
The practice was followed by several speakers,
including Kenny Johnson, a correctional officer at Logan CC, Senator
Sally Turner of Illinois’ 44th district, and Representative Bill
Hauter of Illinois’ 87th district.
All of the speakers talked about the importance of
keeping Logan CC in Logan County. Hauter referred to Logan CC as a
“promise” to the people of Logan County. He also accused Governor J.
B. Pritzker of moving Logan CC to the Chicagoland area to support
his “Chicago favored political allies.” Hauter went on to describe
the Illinois Department of Corrections’ (IDOC) and Pritzker’s
arguments for moving Logan CC “weak” and a “pure political
decision.”
7031 You Tube Video – Save Logan CC rally
march begins on the south side of the Logan County Courthouse
7032 – You Tube Video – Rally march to protest closure of Logan
County Correctional Center reaches the corner of Kickapoo and
Broadway Streets
0733 – You Tube Video – Pan view shows the massive number of people
who attended the rally
JEFF THIS IS THE ONE FROM YESTERDAY – You Tube Video - Rally March
heads down Broadway Street to the Lincoln Junior High School
Once 4:30 p.m. hit, the rally began its march from the courthouse to
Lincoln Junior High School (LJHS), the site of the public hearing.
The crowd chanted the whole way down Broadway Street, fondly
observed by local business owners, including J & M Meat Market. The
police blocked off the road to keep the marchers safe as they
walked. Upon arriving at LJHS, everyone began to file in through the
front door, turning right, and entering the gymnasium that had been
set up for the hearing.
Just before going into LJHS for the hearing, LDN was able to talk
with Senator Sally Turner for a brief interview.
When asked what
motivates her to fight for Logan CC, Turner said, “look around. All
our people are here. Families are here, individuals are here,
employees are here, loved ones of those that are incarcerated are
here, businesses are here. They’re all here. These are good jobs
that will be going to the Chicagoland area, and for what?”
Senator
Turner was then asked to comment on Governor Pritzker’s statement on
Logan County needing to invest more in private industry and not rely
on government funding.
Senator Turner had this to say: “I believe he
said the prison shouldn’t be your economic development. It’s
interesting, though, because the mayor [of Crest Hill] said, ‘yay,
we’re really glad that you’re coming here. It will help our economic
development.’ Isn’t that interesting? If they want to give us some
more tools for that [that would be great], but since the closure of LDC [Lincoln Developmental Center], we have not gotten any help.”
LDC closed its doors back in 2002.
Around 5 p.m., most of the people were seated in the
gymnasium. Shortly after, the hearing began. To say the room was
tense would be an understatement. Attendance was taken, and of the
many Illinois Congresspeople’s names who were called, only three
were in attendance. These three were Senator David Koehler, Democrat
from the 46th district, Representative C. D. Davidsmeyer, Republican
from the 100th district, and Senator Donald Dewitte, Republican from
the 33rd district. These three Congressmen were the primary people
asking questions of the panelists.
There were a handful of panels that sat before the Congressmen. Each
panelist was given two minutes to speak. A light in front of them
would turn from green to yellow when their time was running short,
from yellow to red when their time was almost up, and would start
beeping at them and flashing red when they had gone over their two
minutes. Most of the panelists of the night, both those in favor of
and opposed to relocating Logan CC, went over time.
The first panel included five representatives from
IDOC who presented the plan as it existed, as well as justifications
for moving Logan CC to the Chicagoland area, namely, Crest Hill,
Illinois. During this panel, it was revealed that the designs for
the new facility were not yet finished, and that the location had
not yet been officially decided upon. The IDOC representatives did
discuss demolishing Stateville Correctional Center, which is in
Crest Hill, and rebuilding that facility and Logan CC as one. The
justification given for moving Logan CC to Crest Hill was several
fold. Firstly, IDOC stated that since over 40% of the women
currently incarcerated at Logan CC are from Cook and the Collar
Counties (DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will), moving it would
create a more “regionalized” approach to women’s incarceration in
Illinois.
“Regionalized” seemed to mean that there would be a
women’s correctional center up north, as well as the one more
centrally located in the state at Decatur.
The IDOC representatives also talked about the
benefit of having a women’s prison in an area that had more
resources available. Since the women from Cook County incarcerated
at Logan CC tend to have longer sentences, IDOC stated that they
needed greater access to resources for rehabilitation. The
representatives from IDOC went on to explain that the new facility
will be built with more resources as well. This, they argued, will
result in less recidivism.
[to top of second column] |
After the IDOC panel spoke, the three Congressmen had
a chance to ask questions of the panel. Senator Koehler made the
statement that, since the three of them had had the chance to tour
both Stateville CC and Logan CC, Stateville seemed in greater need
of repair of the two. He then asked how much it would cost to
refurbish Logan CC, to which the answer was approximately $130
million. The price of building the new facility in Crest Hill was
stated to be about $400 million, but that number was met with
skepticism from the Congressmen. They stated that the cost of
building in the Chicagoland area is always more expensive when
compared to Central Illinois.
Representative Davidsmeyer asked about what moving
employees from Logan CC to other correctional centers across the
state would look like in regard to the employees’ salaries, progress
towards promotions, retirement, etc.
The IDOC representatives stated that they would work with the
unions, have meaningful discussions, and would follow the steps
outlined in the collective bargaining agreement “to a T.”
Davidsmeyer then asked if IDOC was creating a
“self-fulfilling prophecy” by announcing Logan CC’s closure 3-5
years before it would be set to close. Many staff may try to
transfer to other facilities or may leave their positions altogether
if they know their positions at Logan CC have an expiration date.
Davidsmeyer then argued that this could lead to difficulty filling
those positions until Logan CC closes, as not many people would want
to start a new job knowing they would not be working there for long.
The panel ended with the IDOC representatives
clarifying that, while a decision had not yet been made on where
Logan CC will be rebuilt, the decision to rebuild it had already
been made. Senator Dewitte asked if this meant that Logan CC could
potentially be rebuilt in Lincoln, to which IDOC responded by
repeating their previous statement.
The next panel was comprised of five women who had
been incarcerated at Logan CC for varying lengths of time and at
different times. It should be noted that all of these women were
residents of the Chicagoland area. They went on to describe the
conditions of Logan CC when each of them was there. None of them had
many positive things to say regarding the condition of the facility,
describing it as “filthy” and “overcrowded.” Walls were described as
crumbling and it was stated that mold was in the showers. Sewage
would occasionally back up into the hallways and raccoons were in
the ceiling. Some of the women went so far as to describe Logan CC
as a place that “should not have been housing humans” and the
conditions there as “conditions no human being should experience.”
The first three women who spoke on this panel
acknowledged that, while they supported Logan CC’s move to the
Chicagoland area, they also recognize that IDOC’s plan does not
recognize the economic impact that moving this facility will have on
local communities.
Senator Dewitte thanked the women for recognizing
this, sharing that Lincoln had already had a lot of negative impact
on its economy. Dewitte then went on to describe all of the jobs
lost due to the closures of LDC, Lincoln College, and Lincoln
Christian University.
Several other panels followed, all of them with panelists who argued
against closing Logan CC and moving it away. Instead of breaking
down each panel, what follows is a breakdown of each argument made,
as several arguments overlapped panels or were brought up by every
panel.
Firstly, everyone agreed that Logan CC needed to be
refurbished at the least and completely rebuilt at the most. No one
argued in favor of the facility’s current condition. They did argue,
however, that this should be done in Lincoln. In Lincoln, Logan CC
would remain centrally located within the state.
Abby Ingram argued that for inmates coming from the farther south
parts of Illinois, moving it to the Chicagoland area would make it
significantly harder for families to come and visit their loved
ones. It was also argued that the transferring of prisoners from the
southern part of the state all the way up to Chicagoland would be
harder, take more time, and be more dangerous than only moving them
to Lincoln.
Another argument made was on the Decatur Corrections
Center’s ability to house Logan CC women. Should some of the women
want to stay located closer to the middle of the state, this may not
be an option for them. Decatur CC is only a minimum level facility,
shared Alfred Campbell, who currently works there. Logan CC houses
minimum, medium, and maximum level offenders, the latter two of whom
would have no choice but to be moved up to the new Crest Hill
facility. Campbell went on to state that Decatur CC had its first
escape attempt in 2023 and its first assault on a staff member in
2022. Both of these instances, Campbell said, were the result of an
inmate being housed there who should have been placed at a higher
level security facility. It was also shared that since Decatur CC
has a women and children’s program, sex offenders cannot legally be
placed there regardless of their offense level.
The argument was made by many that most of the staff currently
working at Logan CC could not or would not move to another IDOC
facility in the state. For many, the prospect of leaving Lincoln or
Central Illinois is unthinkable or nigh impossible. Johnson shared
that he could not think of a single coworker who would move if Logan
CC were moved. Some panelists shared personal details describing why
they could not move.
One woman shared that she and her husband both work at Logan CC.
They also have a daughter who is battling cancer and who has doctors
in Peoria. Her husband is also his father’s primary care giver. His
father lives in the area and is also suffering from cancer.
Problems with staffing both the old facility as well as the any new
facility was another issue brought up by many panelists. Campbell
shared that he is a screener for new employees of IDOC facilities
across the state. Several people who he has been screening for
employment have already been asking questions about Logan CC
closing. They ask why they should work at that facility if the job
has a guaranteed end date.
Josh Marine, an instructor at Logan CC, shared that the staff has
had to work very hard over the years to become as well trained as
they are today. They worked hard to get access to training for their
employees to meet all the needs of their diverse inmates. Many
others shared similar details, stating that you will not find a more
well trained IDOC staff in Illinois.
Some panelists made arguments on the negative economic impact that
Lincoln and Logan County would feel should Logan CC be moved from
the county. Closing the facility would take over 450 jobs from
people in Logan County as well as some of the surrounding counties.
Mayor of Lincoln, Tracy Welch, who could not be in attendance, had
previously made comments that if Logan CC were to be moved, Lincoln
would be losing out on about $61 million of government funding
annually. Representative Davidsmeyer shared that he asked the mayor
of Crest Hill how he would feel if he were the mayor of Lincoln.
According to Davidsmeyer, the mayor of Crest Hill tiptoed around the
question.
Logan County Board Member Dale Nelson
third from left
Dale Nelson of the Logan County Board shared that
taxes would have to be raised to continue to operate the county.
Some panelists went so far as to say that moving Logan CC would kill
the town.
Shannon Kelly addressed Governor Pritzker directly
(though Pritzker was not in attendance), stating, “if you move
forward with this plan, you will be the assassin that kills Lincoln,
Illinois.”
Once final arguments had been made, the hearing was brought to a
close and everyone was dismissed.
A vote was set to be held Friday, June 14th at 11 a.m. regarding
moving forward with IDOC’s plan or not. Only three members of CoGFA
were present for the vote, so a quorum was not achieved, and no vote
could be taken.
Shortly after the notice that the vote was not taken Senator Sally
Turner and Representative Bill Hauter made a joint statement
expressing their disappointment in the outcome of the day.
That statement is also published in today’s (Saturday, June 15th)
edition of Lincoln Daily News.
[Matt Boutcher] |