Finance Committee Discusses Future of Insurance for Logan County Employees

[March 24, 2025] 

On Monday, March 24th, the Finance committee of the larger Logan County Board met for a special meeting. This meeting was held beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Blue Room of the Logan County Safety Complex. All four committee members were present, which included Chairman Kathy Schmidt, Vice Chairman Joseph Kuhlman, Lance Conahan, and Keenan Leesman. Leesman came in at about 7:50. Other board members present were Dale Nelson, Gil Turner, and Michael DeRoss. Also present were Penny Thomas (Treasurer), Theresa Moore (County Clerk and Recorder), and Kelly Elias (Circuit Clerk). There were also several employees from Elias’s office.

One of the two topics that were discussed at this meeting was insurance for county employees. This issue had been discussed at the regular board meeting last week, but it was decided this meeting needed to be had so everyone’s voice could be heard on the matter. The other topic of this committee meeting, that being funding for the broadband project, was discussed after insurance. For a breakdown of what went on with that half of the meeting, see LDN’s other article on this meeting.

Schmidt kicked off the meeting by informing everyone that this was “a meeting for discussion.” The board has a small amount of time left before a vote must be had, as they are going to vote on renewing insurance on April 2nd.

At last week’s regular board meeting, Nathan Whiteman from American Central Insurance (ACI), the insurance brokerage company that Logan County uses to help find insurance for its employees, was present to explain the two options the board has. Essentially, the only two plans the board has to choose from both come from Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS). The first option is keeping the plan the employees have now. This choice would result in a seventeen percent increase in cost of coverage. The other option would be a three-tier system in which most hospitals are in-network, but Springfield Clinic would be in an in-network category of its own, tier-two. This second tier would have a higher cost for employees using Springfield Clinic than if they went to a different in network hospital that falls into what is known as tier-one. This second plan would only result in an eight percent increase in coverage.

Discussion over money, specifically dollar amounts of how much each of the two plans is going to cost, were had very early on. On the current plan, employees can choose from three increasingly expensive insurance plans. The first is a health savings account (HSA). The second is a plan with a deductible of $3,500. The last is a plan with a deductible of $1,500. Employees on the HSA would go from contributing $0 per month to $65.97. Employees on the $3,500 deductible plan would have to pay $183.47 per month, an increase of $171.85. The employees on the $1,500 deductible plan would pay $227 per month, an increase of $172. The total cost of staying on the old plan would be $752,000 for the year. On the proposed three-tier plan, that amount would be about $710,000.

Thomas stated that she wanted to ask the board to increase their current insurance contributions to help cover the cost of this increase. She also revealed that the county has over $100,000 in money to be put toward insurance. Elias also voiced some concern that employees might walk out. She stated that the employees are expected to contribute too much. Nelson responded that this is why the board decided to increase their contribution to the cost of employee insurance last year. Elias shot back that that lasted for about four months, and now the cost is going to go right back up. Nelson understood, stating that the board was always planning on re-evaluating their contributions depending on what the increase was going to be.

Elias then requested that the board cover the insurance completely. She stated that the new three-tier plan puts most of the hospitals on the north end of the county into tier-one. Elias and others live on the south side of the county, and their main option is Springfield Clinic, which, as stated previously, would require much higher contributions from employees before BCBS paid for their care.

Elias then read an email from Dan Benedict, head of the Veterans Assistance Commission in the county. Benedict suggested maybe joining up with a larger union in a neighboring county. One of the reasons that the county employee’s insurance keeps going up so much each year is because they do not have as many people on it as larger counties do. If paired with a larger county, this could help reduce the cost for the individual employees.

Whiteman then spoke on the issue, talking about being self-insured versus fully-insured. Right now, the county is fully insured. This means that, if BCBS has to pay more for medical bills than they receive in contributions from the county and its employees, they take a loss. This has been the case of the last several years, with several individuals on the plan having high, frequent medical costs. This is also the other part of what has been leading BCBS to raise their rates from year-to-year.

Self-insurance would be if the county wrote its own health insurance plan. While Whiteman liked this idea, he stated that Logan County does not have a big enough “pool” to make this work well. He also stated that, if self-insurance fails, that can be really bad for the county. Whiteman also stated that if trying to join with another “pool,” like another county, it is actually best to do that in a year when you have a low renewal rate. A higher renewal rate tells the other pool that your pool has high claimants, and that can actually drive the cost of insurance up for everyone in the pool rather than lowering it.

[to top of second column]

Conahan then asked if the county could sign a shortened renewal of six months, giving them time to form an insurance committee and start making a plan of what to do next with insurance. Whiteman stated that BCBS did agree to let the county change their renewal date from April to December, meaning that whatever plan the county goes with, the plan will be up for renewal again before the end of the year. This puts insurance renewal on the same timeline as the county’s fiscal budget, making budgeting for insurance significantly easier.

There was then a question of why ACI did not look into any companies other than BCBS. Whiteman stated that they did. Health Alliance is the other company they usually go with, but they are closing down at the end of the year. Other companies that ACI looked into to keep county employees fully insured were United Healthcare, Cigna, and Aetna. He stated that United Healthcare declined to give ACI a quote for the county this year, as did Cigna and Aetna. This really leaves BCBS as the only viable option for full coverage insurance.

Conahan spoke up again, voicing some grievances with ACI. He told Whiteman that ACI does not seem to be working. Conahan stated that he spoke with department heads and the primary concern with each of them is insurance. He also stated that he has heard people were having trouble getting a hold of anyone from ACI to ask questions. He further went on to say that ACI was not communicating with the Finance Committee ahead of time on issues of insurance. Conahan used an example, saying that if Whiteman was his personal insurance broker, and the options for insurance he had were bad, he would be shopping for a new broker. This is what, according to Conahan, the Finance committee owes to the taxpayers of the county.

Whiteman stated that he often feels that the insurance agents get blamed for insurance companies not offering quotes that people like. He stated that almost every county employee has his number, but that he is not often contracted with questions. He also stated that board Chairman JR Glenn asked for information on insurance renewal earlier this year. He was under the impression that he had given the information to the correct party, and was not aware that the information never made it to the Finance committee.

Elias then spoke up again, stating that she did not feel that ACI was presenting all the options to the board, citing the discussion from earlier about joining another pool. Whiteman stated that ACI brings that option to the board every year. The issue with it is, by the time the county votes on a plan, there is not enough time to vote on joining another pool. A plan like that would need to be worked out for months in advance, but BCBS only gives their renewal proposal a couple of months in advance. Whiteman stated that voting on joining another pool without all of the information would be “irresponsible.” He stated that if the county were going to go forward with a plan like that, they would need to start working on it at least six months ahead of renewal.

Nelson then stated that he was also frustrated that ACI was not presenting all of the options, and only selecting the ones they thought were the best. While there were other companies that offered insurance to the county, the rate increases compared to the current plan were all significantly higher than BCBS’s seventeen percent. Nelson’s argument was that even plans such as these should be presented to the board, and they would be the ones to determine if the plans were bad or too expensive. “That is what we are paying you to do,” Nelson told Whiteman.

The conversation moved on to the board increasing the amount they pay for employee insurance and staying on the same plan. It was stated that, if the board pays an extra $150 per employee per month, bringing the total up to $900 from $750, this would cost the county roughly $75,000 of the aforementioned $100,000. Elias tried again to get the county to pay for the total insurance. Numbers were then run to see what it would cost to keep employee contributions the same, meaning the board would pick up the full cost of the increase, but not the full cost of insurance. The exact amount this would cost would be $72,432.

Discussion was had between the time those numbers were being run. Leesman asked Whiteman what it would take to join a pool. Whiteman stated that they would need to get educated on things and learn where the risks in that plan lie. They would also need to put some quotes together, but reiterated that they would need at least six months to get that together.

It was eventually decided to table the insurance discussion for the special full board meeting tomorrow night. This meeting will be held in the third floor Courtroom of the Logan County Courthouse starting at 6:00 pm.

[Matt Boutcher]

Back to top