U of I branch offers 
digital distance diagnostics

[MAY 8, 2000]  The University of Illinois Extension Office analyzes hundreds of samples for area residents each year, ranging from insect specimens to lawn problems.  This year there will be a new tool to help with samples that can’t be diagnosed locally.

Digital distance diagnostics, or DDD for short, is a new technology that will fit somewhere between a local staff identification and sending specimens to the plant clinic located on campus.  DDD refers more to the method than the equipment for analyzing samples.

Patterned after a University of Georgia program, Illinois has now equipped local offices, including Logan County, with a dissecting microscope, a digital camera and an interface that allows us to take digital pictures through the microscope.  The interface will also allow for classroom teaching using projection equipment or television to show groups what is under the ’scope.

People interested in using the DDD program need to fill out information sheets that would then be uploaded to a Web site at the University of Illinois with up to five digital pictures.  This information is then relayed to an Extension educator or university specialist who will attempt to “problem solve,” using the information provided and the digital pictures.  An e-mail response is then delivered to the County Extension Office.

 

 

Illinois had 10 sites as pilot locations last year during the summer months.  Generally the response times averaged 48 hours for samples that had sufficient information and good quality photos.  About 20 percent of the samples lacked the proper information or the photos didn’t show necessary items for a diagnosis, but almost all were diagnosed with additional submissions.

 

Samples may be submitted by both homeowners and commercial growers.  There is no cost for access to the service, but it will be used at the discretion of local staff to avoid clogging the system with problems that can be diagnosed at the local office.  Some examples of submissions would include weed identification, insect identification, turf grass disease identification, herbicide injury to crops and about anything else that can be thought of.

 

(To top of second column)

According to staff that used the system in the pilot project last year, one of the biggest challenges was “getting insects to stay still” long enough to get good photos to transmit.  As a good pilot does, this one provided some answers, such as “chilling the insects in the freezer first, or a piece of well-placed Scotch tape” to make the photo shoot possible.

One of the interesting aspects that this type of program offers is “the virtual county agent” (or farm adviser, for some who go back a few years).  One example would be a homeowner taking his own digital pictures and e-mailing them with a good description to the local Extension Office.  The office can then send them on and e-mail a response back to the grower within a reasonable period of time.  The keys to this type of submission would be good-quality photos and good information.  Due to the transmit time, it is recommended to use the small pixel setting on cameras with an option.

 

 

Those interested in more information or in trying a DDD entry may e-mail me at fultonj@mail.aces.uiuc.edu.  If you would prefer the old-fashioned way, call 732-8289 and ask for John.  Either way, the goal is still to try and help area residents put knowledge to work.

 

[John Fulton]