Friday, April 1

\

Governor's comprehensive school plan sets higher standards backed by more funds          Send a link to a friend

[The charts on this page accompany an article posted on another page. Click here for the article.]

[APRIL 1, 2005] 

Proposed high school course requirements

Program area

Graduating class

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

English

3

3

3

3

4

Math

2

3

* 3

* 3

* 3

Science

1

1

1

2

2

# Writing-intensive courses

0

0

2

2

2

Total credits

16

16

16

17

18

* Includes prescriptive requirements for pre-algebra in middle school, Algebra I and course work with geometry content.

# One writing-intensive course must be in English. The other can be in any subject, including English. The State Board of Education will develop standards for writing-intensive courses. These courses can also be used to fulfill other requirements, such as English or social studies. 

Remaining the same: One year of social studies; one year of elective (music, art, foreign language or vocational).

[Return to the article]

 

Spending the $440 million

Category

Amount
(million)

Comment

Foundation level

$379.9

Raises the foundation level almost $250

Early childhood

$30

Fulfills three-year commitment

Additional advanced placement classes

$8.6

Approximately 32,000 college-bound seniors have not enrolled in a college-level course; this would allow them to

Dual enrollment

$1.4

 

Career and tech education

$10

 

Agriculture education

$0.5

 

Arts and foreign language

$5

Create innovative grant program to help local districts

Bilingual education

$2

 

"Grow Your Own Teachers"

$1.5

 

Need critical special education

$1.1

Restores grant programs whose funding was directed to other sources by recent legislation

Total

$440

 

[Return to the article]

Education spending increases by state,
FY 2003-2005
 

These numbers compare Illinois to other states, on the basis of percentage increase from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2005. Illinois was No. 1 in the Midwest in increasing education funding from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2005. Source: National Conference of State Legislatures.

Rank

State

Percentage increase

 1

Vermont

48.06%

2

Arkansas

23.04%

3

Arizona

20.00%

4

New Jersey

19.78%

5

Nevada

19.36%

6

Virginia

19.06%

7

California

18.30%

8

Maryland

16.29%

9

Florida

13.73%

10

Hawaii

13.56%

11

Illinois

13.00%

12

Pennsylvania

12.49%

13

Wyoming

12.39%

14

Mississippi

11.65%

15

Delaware

11.44%

16

Alaska

10.92%

17

Kansas

10.54%

18

New Mexico

10.42%

19

Tennessee

9.78%

20

Colorado

9.52%

21

Utah

9.21%

22

Minnesota

8.63%

23

Oregon

8.36%

24

North Carolina

8.30%

25

Alabama

7.98%

26

Indiana

7.50%

27

Oklahoma

6.13%

28

New York

6.12%

29

South Dakota

6.09%

30

North Dakota

5.67%

31

Rhode Island

5.51%

32

Connecticut

5.22%

33

Ohio

5.18%

34

Iowa

4.68%

35

South Carolina

4.62%

36

Idaho

3.88%

37

Washington

3.77%

38

Missouri

3.69%

39

West Virginia

3.61%

40

Maine

3.50%

41

Louisiana

2.43%

42

Wisconsin

2.17%

43

Michigan

-1.74%

44

Montana

-1.96%

45

Georgia

-2.03%

46

Nebraska

-2.04%

47

Massachusetts

-2.31%

48

Texas

-5.32%

49

New Hampshire

-10.82%

 

Kentucky

(N/A)

[Return to the article]

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor