Herman Geriets, Robert Jackson, Paul Donath, all residents of Elm
Street and Mary Conrady of CEFCU came before the council to oppose
the chip and oil that is being laid. Their arguments were that
asphalt is what was expected, it has a better appearance, it doesn’t
track into homes and businesses the way chip and oil does and it
provides more years of service for the dollar than oil and chip.
Alice Geriets said that they had petitioned all the residents on the
street and all but two want asphalt. She summed it up saying, “We
want it done and we want it done right.”
A review of previous meeting minutes when the project was discussed
revealed that the project was stated to be either oil and chip or
asphalt and was bid out for either. When the bids came in the
Illinois Valley Paving’s bid of $561,541.45 for chip and oil and an
additional $86,570 for asphalt was the lowest bid, whether choosing
chip and oil or asphalt.
In reviewing the aldermen seemed to miss that it was chip and oil
bid that they accepted at the time it was voted on. Finance chair
Verl Prather and new streets chair Patrick Madigan said that they
had thought it was asphalt they were choosing.
Choosing the lesser bid allowed for all the infrastructure projects
slated for this fiscal year to be completed.
Prather said, “If we’re going to spend a half million dollars I’d
rather we put the right surface down.”
After some discussion and consultation with city attorney Bill Bates
it was decided to allow city engineer Mark Mathon to see if Illinois
Valley Paving would halt the final layer of chip and oil and
negotiate reworking the road in the spring and laying asphalt and
for what price.
[Jan Youngquist] |