| 
            
            Salt Creek flow review not best news, not worst news. Waste water 
            treatment plant to modify operations        
            
   Send a link to a friend 
			
            
            [DEC. 27, 2006]  
            
            
            LINCOLN -- 
            Lincoln officials have been looking into a problem at the city 
            wastewater treatment plant. When the plant's $10 million dollar 
            upgrade was 
            completed according to Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 
            specifications a few years ago it was believed that there would be 
            few changes needed for some years.  | 
		
            | However, what couldn’t be anticipated was a change 
            in the creek. According to new flow rate information compiled by the 
            Illinois State Water Survey the creek rate had diminished and could 
            no longer support the amount of clarified water (effluent) the 
            Lincoln plant discharges.
 The IEPA could not renew the city’s first five-year wastewater 
            treatment plant permit.
 
 At the recommendation of the wastewater treatment plant manager, 
            Dave Kitzmiller from EMC, city aldermen agreed to hire a consultant 
            to evaluate the Salt Creek flow rate figures.
 
 Josiah Cox from Trumpet Land Services, St. Louis, MO worked with 
            ISWS to update the figures. “Recent data more accurately reflect 
            current condition in the Salt Creek stream systems,” the report 
            reads.
 
 Changes cited from the report that affected the flow rate:
 
              
              Clinton Lake was finished in 1978, creating lake releases during 
            low flow periods.
              The cities of Kenney, Clinton and Maroa all have either begun or 
            increased the amount of effluent flow they discharge into Salt 
            Creek.
              Meteorological has trended towards greater precipitation in the 
            region, raising the amount of flow occurring during low flow 
            situations. Bottom line, the figures had changed favorably for the city, but not 
            enough to not do something different. 
 Initially, it looked like one or two more clarifiers at a cost of $1 
            million to $2 million would need to be added in order to bring the 
            water quality in line with what the stream can now support. The 
            other option was to cut back on the plant operation. The amount of 
            the cut back would mean no more additions to the system.
 
 However, working with the new figures it was determined that the 
            plant could derate the volume of water treated each day to an amount 
            that would meet IEPA standards with no other changes. There will 
            still be plenty of room for growth, other than if someone came in 
            that used a ton of water, such as a slaughter house, Kitzmiller 
            said.
 
 [Jan Youngquist]
 | 
            
             
             
            
             |