44th District weekly update          Send a link to a friend

From Sen. Bill Brady

[OCT. 13, 2006]  The following is a column provided by state Sen. Bill Brady, District 44:

Sen. Brady chairs Senate task force meeting in Plainfield

I convened the Senate Republican Health Facilities Planning Board Task Force in Plainfield on Oct. 4 to take a closer look at the politically charged and increasingly litigious process that is all too common in determining health facility construction and modification.

Senate Deputy Republican Leader Ed Petka, R-Plainfield, asked me to convene the task force to discuss a ruling by the Health Facilities Planning Board against a proposal by Edward Hospital in Naperville to open a hospital in Plainfield.

More than 33,000 Plainfield area residents signed a petition in support of a hospital in Plainfield. Why should the opinions of four members of a state board trump the interests of these people? There is obviously a flaw in the system if the board cannot recognize the need in the Plainfield community.

A number of local officials testified at the hearing, including the Plainfield mayor, Naperville mayor, Will County Board members and Plainfield village officials.

Sen. Petka said the process should be changed to put the burden of proof on the Health Facilities Planning Board to show that the project is not necessary.

"I share concerns with local officials about decisions being made about health care facilities in our region, which is one of the fastest growing areas in the state of Illinois," Petka said. "Edward Hospital in Naperville has been working since 2003 to open a hospital in Plainfield, but the Health Facilities Planning Board has denied the request. Access to quality heath care for local residents is more than enough incentive to ask some strong questions about the reasoning behind the Health Facilities Planning Board's decisions against a hospital in Plainfield."

[to top of second column]

The Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board has had a tumultuous couple of years, and it appeared that the current administration was taking some steps to reform the system. However, other than replacing the members of the planning board, it appears that nothing else has changed. This task force is looking at ways to remove politics from the system and establish a process based on merit, not on political influence.

Electric rates should have been dealt with last spring

The question of electric rate increases should have been dealt with during the spring session and should not have been subjected to current pre-election political forces. However, Senate President Emil Jones, who has supported ComEd in the past, opposed calls this spring to extend the rate freeze.

House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, asked Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Oct. 2 to call a special session to consider legislation that would continue a freeze on electric rates for three more years

A state power auction in September, where power providers bid to supply electricity to ComEd and Ameren, revealed the state could see rate hikes of as much as 22 percent in the ComEd service area and up to 55 percent downstate.

The governor has not made any move to call a special session, although he said he would call the session if Madigan can show he has enough votes to pass a rate freeze.

The General Assembly's veto session is scheduled to begin Nov. 14 and conclude Nov. 30.

[Column from Sen. Bill Brady]

           

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor