Other News...

Sponsored by

FCC Appeals Indecency Case to High Court

Send a link to a friend

[November 03, 2007]  WASHINGTON (AP) -- Comparing its dilemma to a Greek myth, lawyers for the Federal Communications Commission have formally asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a lower court's rejection of the agency's policy on broadcast profanity.

Last June, the 2nd District Court of Appeals in New York nullified the agency's enforcement regime regarding so-called "fleeting expletives" by a 2-1 vote, saying the FCC had changed its policy and failed to adequately explain why it had done so.

The case involved two airings of the "Billboard Music Awards" in which celebrities' expletives were broadcast over the airwaves.

Following a challenge by Fox Broadcasting Co. and others, the court nullified the policy until the agency could return with a better explanation for the change. In the same opinion, the court also said the agency's position was probably unconstitutional.

"The court has thus sent the commission back to run a Sisyphean errand while effectively invalidating much of the Commission's authority" to enforce indecency rules, reads the appeal, filed with the Supreme Court on Thursday.

Sisyphus, in Greek mythology, was eternally cursed by the Gods to roll a giant rock up a steep hill, never able to quite reach the top before it rolled back down again.

The court rejected the FCC's policy on procedural grounds, but was "skeptical that the commission can provide a reasoned explanation for its fleeting expletive regime that would pass constitutional muster."

[to top of second column]

The Solicitor General's Office, which argues cases before the Supreme Court on behalf of government agencies, wrote that the decision "places the commission in an untenable position."

It noted that the FCC has pending before it "hundreds of thousands of complaints" regarding the broadcast of expletives and argued that the appeals court decision has left the agency "accountable for the coarsening of the airwaves while simultaneously denying it effective tools to address the problem."

The appeal also argues that the FCC's explanation of its policy was well reasoned and that the appeals court decision was at odds with the landmark 1978 indecency case, FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, the last broadcast indecency case heard by the Supreme Court.

The FCC has not issued a fine for indecency since March 2006.

[Associated Press; By JOHN DUNBAR]

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor