For them, it was a rush of relief after 17 agonizing months of facing the burden of criminal prosecution and the prospect of a long stint in prison.
But their worries are far from over.
The Justice Department is still considering whether to bring a federal case against the officers, and a civil lawsuit looms. And civil rights leaders have no intention of letting interest in the case fizzle. The Rev. Al Sharpton and victim Sean Bell's fiancee and family planned a rally Saturday to keep up pressure for holding the officers accountable for his death.
"We are going to react in a methodical and serious way," Sharpton said Friday, adding that he is organizing "economic withdrawal" and "civil disobedience" that could involve going to jail, marching on Wall Street, and at police headquarters. "We are going to close the city down in a nonviolent, effective way. We're going to hit the pocketbooks."
Sharpton made his proclamation hours after three undercover detectives were acquitted of all charges in Bell's 2006 death.
In announcing his verdict, Justice Arthur Cooperman said that the inconsistent testimony, courtroom demeanor and rap sheets of the prosecution witnesses
- mainly Bell's friends - "had the effect of eviscerating" their credibility.
"At times, the testimony just didn't make sense," the judge said.
The verdict elicited gasps as well as tears of joy and sorrow. Detective Michael Oliver, who fired 31 of the shots, wept at the defense table, while Bell's mother cried in the packed courtroom. Shouts of "Murderers! Murderers!" and "KKK!" rang out on the courthouse steps.
Oliver and Gescard Isnora were acquitted of charges that included manslaughter, assault and reckless endangerment. The third officer, Marc Cooper, faced lesser charges.
The officers later appeared at a news conference with the leader of their union, offering brief statements and taking no questions. "I'd like to say sorry to the Bell family for the tragedy," an emotional Cooper said.
Bell's fiancee did not comment after the verdict. Trent Benefield, a friend of Bell's who was wounded in the shooting, tearfully denounced the judge's decision as unfair.
"They should have gotten what they deserve," he told the Daily News.
Bell, a 23-year-old black man, was killed outside a seedy strip club in Queens in 2006 as he was leaving his bachelor party. The officers
- undercover detectives who were investigating reports of prostitution at the club
- said they thought one of the men had a gun.
The slaying heightened tensions in the city and stoked long-standing allegations of racism and excessive use of force on the part of New York City's police, even though two of the officers charged are black.
Police had assigned extra officers to the courthouse and had helicopters in the air to help deal with any unrest Friday. But within an hour, the angry, weeping crowd of about 200 people outside the courthouse had scattered, and no arrests were made.
Protests followed later in the day, and police said two demonstrators were arrested Friday night near the site of the shooting. One was arrested on a disorderly conduct charge, the other on a charge of obstructing governmental administration, police said.
The officers had complained that pretrial publicity had unfairly painted them as cold-blooded killers. They opted to have the judge instead of a jury decide the case, a strategy that appeared to pay off.
After the verdict, the U.S. attorney's office said it would look into the case and "take appropriate action if the evidence indicates a prosecutable violation of federal criminal civil rights statutes."