|
"It's asking a lot of soldier, but today's environment is so different than World War II or Korea," said Skelton, D-Mo. "It deals with civil affairs. We have not been as active military in civil affairs in recent years. This puts it front and center." Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Chiarelli said he was aware of concerns among some policymakers and military leaders that the Army is too focused on counterinsurgency, the type of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Critics have said the Army may lose its ability to respond to NATO obligations. Chiarelli said soldiers already go from stability operations in neighborhoods to high-intensity combat and back to stability "in a wink of an eye." That flexibility isn't something U.S. forces were immediately prepared to do when they trained for Iraq in 2002 and 2003. "I don't worry about that," Chiarelli said. Col. Joseph Martin, commander of Fort Riley's 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, said in an e-mail Tuesday from Iraq that his units used a draft of the training manual earlier this year to prepare for deployment. "The Army has crafted a model that establishes a balance between being trained for mid- to high-level intensity combat operations and the rigors of the current conflict against terror," said Martin, 44, of Dearborn, Mich. ___ On the Net: Army Field Manual 7.0:
http://usacac.army.mil/CAC2/
Repository/FM70/FM7-0.pdf
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor