|
Coal rumbles away, all day every day, in trucks on the Coal River Road. It crisscrosses the highway and the Big Coal River on a network of conveyor belts from portals to processing plants. Shiny new pickups and convenience store doors bear Friends of Coal stickers. And everywhere are the miners in their telltale navy blue, pants and jackets slashed with reflective stripes of lime-green or orange. Joyce Gunnoe, keeper of a general store in Dry Creek, sees the wind farm advocates as meddling outsiders bent on destroying a way of life. They don't, as she puts it, "have a dog in this fight." "We work here. We live here. We were born and raised here," she says. "Coal hasn't hurt us. Coal's helped us." While she acknowledges many locals also want to stop mountaintop mining, she says they're mainly people who are retired or disabled, people who no longer need the work the mines offer. Yes, she hears the blasting, the equipment, the trucks. "But the way I see it, those are guys trying to make a living, to keep us here, to keep our schools open." Even supporters of the wind farm understand that a transition from coal will take time. "Our politicians have never seen fit to diversify," says Bob Wills, who has lived on a picturesque, 99-acre Rock Creek farm for most of his life. His son, like many young people trying to avoid the mines, took the only path he could find
-- the one out of state. "If they do away with the mining, then I don't know what people are going to do," Wills says. "It's a necessary evil, I guess." Back in the 1970s, the federal government passed laws to control damage from surface mining, and underground mining remained the dominant method of production for many years. But after Wyoming supplanted Appalachia as the nation's biggest supplier of coal, that began to change. Across the central Appalachian coalfields, operators began to see mountaintop removal as a cheaper way to compete. The National Mining Association now estimates that between 14 percent and 15 percent of the nation's coal production comes from mountaintop removal mining. In Appalachia, the number of surface mines now exceeds underground operations. Curtis Moore, who runs Good Samaritan Ministry in Whitesville, tries to describe the results for people who live in New York, Chicago, Atlanta. "Just remove your skyscrapers. Take it down to ground zero and then see what your city looks like," he says. "They'd be devastated. And that's what it is here with the mountains." A study by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimated 400,000 acres of forest were wiped out and nearly 724 miles of streams buried between 1985 and 2001 alone. North Carolina-based Appalachian Voices, which maintains the ilovemountains.org Web site, estimates 470 mountains have already been destroyed. In an e-mail to The Associated Press on Thursday, CEO Don Blankenship insisted Massey mines responsibly, with safety and the environment in mind. Cost, he said, is not the only consideration. "Most coal mined by surface mining cannot be deep mined," he wrote. "Energy resources would be lost if not surface mined. "Our company is an energy company," he added. "We produce mostly coal, but also natural gas. If wind farms proved to be economical, we would invest in them. We are studying that possibility, but the answer is not yet clear in West Virginia." To retired union miner Lloyd Brown of Whitesville, it's this simple: "There's a right way and a wrong way to mine coal. Massey's come in here, and he (Blankenship) has raped the southern part of West Virginia just to get the coal. "They're taking away the beauty of West Virginia," he says. "This is part of the beauty, our mountains. They say they put them back better than they were. I don't see that." In theory, coal operators restore the land to its approximate original contour and replant it for future use. Blankenship even suggests "windmills are more practical on mountains after mining than before" because of the access and infrastructure that are created.
But critics say mined ground is an unstable pile of rubble, too shaky and too short
-- by several hundred feet in the Coal River Mountain scenario -- to catch the best winds. Across Appalachia golf courses, shopping centers, regional jails and factories have been built on one-time mines. Even the FBI complex in Clarksburg was built atop a former strip mine. But a mountain mined never looks the same. "I'm not well educated. I don't have a lot of fancy words," says Sam McGee, a former miner who lives on Rock Creek, below Massey's proposed blasting site. "All I can do is speak from the heart and say they're destroying us." ___ Environmental groups aren't banking on Blankenship to drop his plans and embrace the wind farm. "With the coal companies, there is no compromise," says Rory McIlmoil, an organizer with Coal River Mountain Watch. Rather, they are hoping that politicians can be persuaded and that a West Virginia lawsuit before the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will reshape the situation. Environmental groups, backed by a 2007 U.S. District Court ruling, argue the Army Corps of Engineers failed to fully consider the environmental damage that would be caused by issuing four valley fill permits to Massey subsidiaries. The corps, however, contends the regulations the plaintiffs want fall under state mining laws, and rejecting the state-issued permits would have been a de facto veto of its authority. And that's why C.C. Ballard, with 39 years of experience at Peabody and Patriot mines, thinks nothing will change. "They're not going to get it stopped. There's no way," says the white-bearded 58-year-old, washing a car at his home in Stickney after finishing a night shift underground. "They're going to come in here, they're going to take everything that West Virginia's got. We're gonna be left with a big hole in the ground and nothing to show for it." Last month, Gov. Joe Manchin declined to intervene in the Coal River Mountain dispute, despite mounting pressure that included a demonstration at the Capitol. It would be inappropriate, he said, to rescind the permits granted by state regulators. "If we can't do it in a more productive manner, it shouldn't be done, I understand that," he says. "And we're looking at that, and I think there are better ways. But just to say we're going to shut it down? We cannot afford in the United States of America to discount any part of our energy portfolio."
At Flint's Hardware in Sylvester, where miners come for uniforms and other supplies, a railroad conductor who hauls coal says it's time Manchin and everyone else realize that coal is a finite resource. "If they don't do something with wind and water," says Charles Cowley, "we're all going to be with the lights out."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor