|
In Cerro Gordo County, District Court Judge Colleen Weiland said she was presented with two applications from same-sex couples and denied them both. "Some judges, frankly, interpret it a lot more leniently than I do," she said of the law on waivers. "The ones that were presented this morning I didn't believe to be an emergency or extraordinary circumstance." Scott County Recorder Rita Vargas said three same-sex couples applied for a marriage license by midday on Monday. One couple asked for a waiver, but a judge denied the request. The couple, 22-year-old Tearese Bomar, and 27-year-old Shamera Page, both of Davenport, said on the waiver form that they had waited a long time to have their union recognized and didn't want to wait any longer, Vargas said. "The judge just determined they didn't have enough extraordinary circumstances to grant that waiver," she said. Some conservative groups and lawmakers were accused of trying to recruit recorders to refuse the licenses. State agencies sent out information to recorders statewide last week saying they could be removed from their positions if they didn't follow the law and issue the licenses. "I am quite optimistic that all 99 recorders will follow the rule of law and issue licenses," said Painter. The state Supreme Court's unanimous and emphatic decision earlier this month made Iowa the third state
-- and first in the nation's heartland -- to allow same-sex marriage. Massachusetts and Connecticut allow gay couples to marry, and a Vermont law allowing gay marriage will take effect in September. The Iowa high court upheld an August 2007 decision by a Polk County District Court judge who found that a state law limiting marriage to a man and a woman violates the constitutional right of equal protection. One couple was married in 2007 before the Polk County judge ordered a stay on his decision. Gay marriage opponents have no other legal options to appeal the case to the state or federal level because they were not parties to the lawsuit, and no federal issue was raised in the case. Their only recourse appears to be a constitutional amendment, which couldn't get on the ballot until 2012 at the earliest. A constitutional convention could be called earlier, but is unlikely.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor