|
Under the bill, Pell Grants would rise slightly more than inflation over the next decade, increasing on average by about 2.6 percent yearly, according to the bill's sponsors. It's the first time lawmakers have ever agreed to a long-term annual increase in the program. Pell Grants have always depended on annual spending bills and on occasion have stayed flat or been cut when lawmakers came under pressure to cut spending. But the increase Congress is prescribing is less than half the 5.6 percent average yearly increase of Pell Grants over the life of the program. During that time, college tuition has risen more than 7 percent annually. And the bill's increases may be illusory. They would still depend on whether Congress provides the money to fund them in its annual spending bills. "It still opens up the possibility of a false promise," said Kantrowitz, publisher of the FinAid.org Web site and the FastWeb.com scholarship search engine. Experts say that to truly make a difference, lawmakers would need to make Pell Grants an entitlement, like Social Security and Medicaid, to end the program's dependence on the annual spending process. In fact, that's what Obama asked Congress to do in his budget proposal. Doing so would make Pell Grants a lot more predictable. And if grants were very predictable
-- if a student knew in middle school that a certain amount would be waiting for her
-- it could have a significant impact on college enrollment, said Baum, a senior policy analyst for the College Board. But it also would be costly and very difficult to pass amid exploding federal deficits. The White House budget office estimated the cost of an entitlement to be $117 billion over the next decade. On Tuesday, the office said the cost would actually rise much higher, by an additional $27 billion, because more people than anticipated are going back to school and demand for Pell Grants is soaring amid the crippled job market. Lawmakers don't have that much to spend. They have $87 billion, an amount they came up with by proposing to have the government take over all federal student loans and end subsidies for private lenders. That amount is not enough to pay for an entitlement. But it would be more than enough to tie Pell Grants to inflation. That carries a $40 billion price tag, leaving Congress with an extra $47 billion to spend. Miller has spread the extra money across an array of programs that are attractive to members of Congress and will attract support for the bill, including many that have nothing to do with higher education. New preschool programs, for example, would get $8 billion. An additional $5 billion would go for construction at elementary, middle and high schools and community colleges. The bill would also send $10 billion back to the federal Treasury. ___ On the Net: Pell Grants: http://www.ed.gov/programs/fpg/
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor