|
Lingle has previously threatened to resort to layoffs of thousands of workers if furloughs were blocked. But after the ruling, she took a wait-and-see attitude. "One of the alternatives is layoffs and I think everyone wants to avoid that," she told reporters. "So we'll wait and see how this all plays out." In a statement released Thursday evening, Lingle said she would look for additional savings from state agencies and from negotiations over labor contracts. The budget shortfall could grow even larger when the state's Council on Revenues meets in September, she said. "While we have already cut $2 billion in spending, the fact is we simply cannot afford the government we have now," Lingle said. Lingle outlined her furlough plan a month ago, saying she would force 14,500 workers under her direct control to take three days off each month for two years. The number of affected employees subsequently rose to 15,600. Furloughs would save about $688 million over total two years, she stated.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor